Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The war on 18-year-old girls (women in combat, draft registration)
WND ^ | March 4, 2013 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 03/04/2013 8:57:32 PM PST by Perseverando

The real war against women is the announced plan of the Obama administration, using outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta as the fall guy, to assign women for the first time in American history to fight our nation’s enemies in military ground combat. That’s real war, with real guns, real bullets and real deaths.

This war doesn’t involve only women who have volunteered to serve in our military. It’s a real war against all 18-year-old American girls, because for the first time in our nation’s history they will be required to sign up for the draft and be ready for a letter from Selective Service ordering them to report for military duty.

That’s because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Rostker v. Goldberg in 1981 that the gender difference in the law requiring “every male citizen” of age 18 through 25 to register does not violate equal protection or due process. However, there was a caveat.

The court ruled: “The purpose of registration was to prepare for a draft of combat troops. Since women are excluded from combat, Congress concluded that they would not be needed in the event of a draft, and therefore decided not to register them.”

Congress must act immediately, before the May passage of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2014, in order to pre-empt what Obama’s Department of Defense, without constitutional authority, is trying to do unilaterally. There is no demand from the American people to pursue this war on young women. The House has not had any hearings on women in combat since 1979, and the Senate has not had hearings since 1991.

Some U.S. military commanders’ disdain for our traditional civilian control of the military is insufferable. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said Congress can “legislate if they like” but

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: diversity; draft; hagel; jcs; jointchiefs; martindempsey; military; ndaa; panetta; usmilitary; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2013 8:57:46 PM PST by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

WND. I should have known the article would be factually incorrect.

Panetta’s lifting the ban on women in combat does not automatically require women to register with the Selective Service and the Congress does not have to act before the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act to prevent such a requirement.

This is “uncharted waters.” Nobody knows how this will work out or whether it will be done through judicial review or congressional legislation. The last SCOTUS ruling we have upheld Congress’ decision to exclude women. The SS has said they will change nothing until Congress acts.

Typical WND.


2 posted on 03/04/2013 9:18:36 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

I say let them start drafting women, they can start with the militant feminists and the liberal idiot well meaning but anti-consequence women first.

Maybe after sending over a couple million of these liberal harlots the REST of us can live our lives without the media thinking they DEFINE us.


3 posted on 03/04/2013 10:26:05 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

If young men have to register for a possible draft, so should young women.


4 posted on 03/04/2013 10:33:41 PM PST by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
Bring them on, let them get drafted, let them lug a 50 cal Machine gun or mortar plate or drag ammo through the mud, they will find out how good they had it.
5 posted on 03/04/2013 10:46:14 PM PST by BooBoo1000 (Some times I wake up grumpy,,, other times I just let her sleep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BooBoo1000

Indeed. This is the 21st Century, women and men are equal in all things. A while back a young woman asked me as i was walking out of a Wal*Mart if I would help her change her flat tire. I just laughed at her and kept walking.


6 posted on 03/04/2013 11:08:33 PM PST by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Typical WND huh?

Can you show where the article is "factually incorrect"?

7 posted on 03/04/2013 11:19:51 PM PST by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

You seem clueless to the fact that females are destroying the military and in time may cost us our nation.

To draft them is the exact opposite of what we should be doing, an all male draft would be needed to replace those females and stop the left’s goal of reaching a 50/50 military.

To start drafting women is to fulfill the left’s most radical dream for our military, yet we see it promoted here by the naive.


8 posted on 03/04/2013 11:35:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: BigCinBigD
But they can drive trucks and cook as well as the next person. And if a few Thousand get their heads shot off so much the better.

No they can't, and no it isn't, you are worse than naive, you are totally clueless on the subject.

10 posted on 03/05/2013 12:40:58 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Why shouldn't women be drafted and placed in non direct combat rolls?
11 posted on 03/05/2013 1:12:34 AM PST by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Didn’t we fight this battle already? Let them try passing the Equal Rights Amendment again, if they are so crazy to have our young women shot to pieces.


12 posted on 03/05/2013 1:59:28 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Perseverando

Panetta is not a fall guy. Not even close. He has always been an intuitive institutionalist. If you want blame him, go ahead. Please stop misreading these socialist fascists. They are not stupid, and are not making mistakes. They are emplacing massive social change.


13 posted on 03/05/2013 3:05:22 AM PST by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

“A while back a young woman asked me as i was walking out of a Wal*Mart if I would help her change her flat tire. I just laughed at her and kept walking.”

Should have charged her for it...


14 posted on 03/05/2013 3:50:50 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

“Why shouldn’t women be drafted and placed in non direct combat rolls?”

As a father of sons, and one fully aware that their “whiteness” and gender will be used to hinder their employment/promotions as well as educations, I can assure you that no son of mine will ever be in the US military in any role, and they certainly won’t be opposed to those who are the “preferred Americans” (beneficiaries of affirmative action policies) serving in the military in any capacity their nanny-state government wishes. It is the “preferred Awericans” ‘ country now; they should be willing to die for it.


15 posted on 03/05/2013 3:55:39 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Come on, front line combat is nothing. Want to see a tough girl really pushed to her limit have her kick a football.


16 posted on 03/05/2013 4:05:58 AM PST by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Feminist women have brought this upon themselves. Yes, draft them. After all, that’s what these man-hating women want for ALL females.

I came from a lost era in America where women were.....well....feminine and ladies. Men were supposed to protect them from harm and did.

In the 70’s when the feminist movement (and lesbians came out of the closet) began and they burned their bras and sung the song “I am woman, hear me roar” was their champion song along with the abandonment of the role of being a housewife and mother to their children, the whole world turned on it’s head.

Like everything else, a minority of liberals ruined it for everyone for the majority of women did not believe in the movement but were totally changed by it.

Now they whine because testosterone filled women are dragging all of the feminine women (what’s left of them) into a man’s world.


17 posted on 03/05/2013 4:33:31 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

I already explained why in my post.


18 posted on 03/05/2013 5:00:39 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

It’s a sick society that sends mommies out to fight its wars. Mommies are meant to be kind and nurturing, not out killing bad guys. That’s what daddies are for.


19 posted on 03/05/2013 5:04:25 AM PST by yuleeyahoo (Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
Why shouldn't women be drafted and placed in non direct combat rolls?

For many reasons, the first being that they can't do the work, you don't seem to know anything about the military.

Tell me, which branch did you serve in so that I can get some idea of what you think of when you think of military life and work and women's effectiveness in it.

20 posted on 03/05/2013 7:31:34 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson