Posted on 01/26/2013 8:46:52 AM PST by bray
Were you a slave when you were called? Don’t let it trouble you—although if you can gain your Freedom, do so. 1 Cor 7:21
Why do we assume scientists are always right? It seems we are being scammed by some of the shiftiest salesmen on the planet beginning with their most questionable foundation of evolution. While they are intimidating and ridiculing Christians for their belief in an all powerful God, they are promoting a theory that has not made any progress in over a hundred and fifty years. This failure happened in spite of every scientist on the planet attempting to discover the holy grail of science, that elusive missing link between monkey and man.
Darwin invented this theory by the logical observations that every animal and plant seems to have a similarity and connection making an obvious chain from one animal to the next. His theory as everyone knows has life beginning randomly in a primordial soup forming the first life forms billions of years ago. Never mind this huge hole in the theory of how life could be formed in a soup that was previously sterilized at over a thousand degrees, you just accept it without explanation or even the slightest bit of logic. This crater is so big that the Darwinists eliminated it from their discussion and saying how it occurred is no longer part of evolution which is like saying starting the car has nothing to do with your destination?
In 1859 Darwin questioned his own theory in his book Origin of Species when he wrote, ” ...as this process of extermination [survival of the fittest] has acted on an enormous scale, so must the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed on the earth, be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record.”
If he asked that question in today’s scientific community he would be called a denier and would be tossed out of the scientific community. After a century and a half it should be time for the scientific community to answer that basic question. Shouldn’t these archeologists be swimming in transitory species’ fossils yet they have not found any which can be confirmed.
Now if you simply ask the question of where life began you will soon be vilified and called a Bible thumping Neanderthal or as they would call it, the missing link. From the magic of life appearing forward evolutionists are very comfortable, since life forms have a continuity they can observe and theorize. First there were bacteria which formed into amoeba’s which evolved into plankton and then fish since they all occur in the ocean and live as well as adapt similarly to each other. There are no explanations of how or why they simply changed from single cells into fish other than you simply need to have faith in random defects turning into superior species rather than inferior or that it can be repeated, you just accept it.
The next step of evolution is moving from the ocean and onto the land which of course was the evolution of whales and whale type creatures which eventually became reptiles. The reptiles ruled the earth as dinosaurs for millions and millions of years until a random ice age happened which wiped them out instantly. This is where it becomes dicey since they are not sure the mammals developed while the dinosaurs were eating them and vice versa since the evolution from reptile to mammal is such a giant leap. Once again we have no transitory species or fossils of those species which makes you have to wonder why no examples of these defective reptiles becoming pure land creatures. You simply take another scientific leap of faith.
The other problem the Darwinists have is where is the missing link? During the early 20th century there was something the scientists called the evolutionary ladder that led to modern man. It began with Nebraska man (fraud) to Peking man (fraud) to Piltdown man (fraud) to Neanderthal (fraud) and then man began walking fully upright. Once that happened then they used their scientific brilliance and made the Black man into one of the lower man evolutions followed by Asian through Slavic, Gypsy, Jew, and then Aryan being the highest form of man which they then attempted to make a super race leading to gas chambers and ovens to purify the race. Good thing science has given up on that evolutionary idea.
Once again science was wrong as it moved away from simple curiosity and investigation and into an agenda driven science and has not moved from there since that time. For any scientist there would have to be millions and millions of transitory species moving from Ape to man, yet not one scientist has found a credible fossil. The evolutions from the ape to man has to have as many separate species as from reptile to ape, yet nothing. Every scientist knows if she finds this fossil she will have instant immortality as they have finally proved God a fake…er…evolution is true. Even the most basic logic has to tell you if they know where modern man first began in Iran on the Euphrates in the simplest of digging areas there should be a sea of those transitional ape/man species and yet they have not found any. Why? There is only one logical answer and that is that man did not evolve from the Great Apes but came from somewhere else. If there were millions of evolutions between Ape and Man which would take more evolutions than moving from amoeba to ape, it is statistically impossible for scientists to not find at least one! The odds have to be billions and billions to one not to find one of these missing links, yet that is exactly what has happened in over a hundred and fifty years of searching.
It really makes you wonder when science began losing its curiosity of the unknown. There had to be a time when science was as eager to disprove their theories as they are now to perpetuate their frauds? If they have not come up with a credible missing link by this time then what stops them from discarding the entire theory. Sure it is easy to say an amoeba looks like a fish and a lizard walking out of the water looks like a mammal. Then of course the Disney movie continues as a dog looks like a horse and when they go up on two legs the can go from monkey to ape to man, but did that actually happen? There is no proof that is what happened which is the giant hole in the theory they have to fill with consensus, intimidation and purging rather than evidence.
The giant question that is not allowed to be asked is, was life formed by a chain of events making them look similar and have continuity or did that similarity occur at creation? Did science actually invent a theory of our creation or are they simply observing the miraculous continuity of a perfect creator? These are questions science does not want to ask and are beginning to fear the answers. Why won’t today’s scientists ask the same logical question Darwin asked, "why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?"
Pray for America
Thanks for that article. I notice that it refers to the Arch. skeptics simply by their last names, without reference to their characters or motives. That’s typical for scientific articles, and in stark contrast to the link provided by the original poster, which constantly refers to scientists who disagree as “certified believers” and “the faithful.” Talk about your thug tactics!
There isn't "proof," there's just lots and lots and lots of evidence. But you're not really interested in evidence, are you?
Thank you, that was quite interesting. It is unfortunate that there are so many who will not accept the article’s conclusions.
Sorry. I have a low tolerance for willful ignorance.
I don’t know how old the earth is and it doesn’t matter what I believe. This is about what proof there is about evolution.
When you don’t have proof or evidence it is easier to name call which is all you have.
Pray for America
You have nothing but name calling to protect your precious belief. Talk about Pot/Kettle.
Pray for America
Because it’s SCIENCE!?
A Bombs, H Bombs, ICBMs, The EMP Bomb, Scientist!
I know. I had to laugh at myself when I saw that. Damn thing is, I previewed several times before posting...
I didn't call you a name. I said you weren't interested in evidence. Your original post makes it clear that you're ignorant of how much evidence there is and don't understand what you do know about. And you seem to like it that way.
If you gave any sign of having read #49 and comprehended it, and tried to rebut it in a serious way, it might be worth presenting you with other evidence. Somehow I don't think that's gonna happen.
Would you give a 5 year child the keys to your car, a credit card and a shopping list expecting the supplies to dinner would soon arrive? Of course not! God reveals truths to men only when mankind is ready for them. God is the most reasonable Being in the universe but men where not ready for the full story until they had experienced the fruits of reason over many centuries. They would have resisted much as you do today. Now you do a disservice to God by insisting on staying in childhood when the rest of the world has grown up. Your insistence on a certain story only makes others think belief in God is childish . I know you want to do right by God, but the world will not accept him if it means being blind to truths revealed about his universe and God knows this country needs God more than ever today!
So we should just accept atheism because it may offend the world? How’s that worked out?
Pray for America
So the difference is 95% rather than 99%. The point is that we are similar to these creatures because they are the close to the point where Evolution branched. The Theory predicts all life is related , that it all starts from the same root. It is confirmed by DNA similarity as well as similarities among characteristics.
Here is a site with lots of info and debate but the debate was settled over a century ago, I only argue the subject at all because I want it to stop getting in the way of a belief in God. A strong belief in a righteous and reasonable God would stop this slide into socialist hell we are falling into. You won't convince many to join with the Lord if you require blind adherence to an ancient tale. A reasonable and loving God is strongest force for good any society can have!
It's worked out TERRIBLE. That is why I argue with you, because I want people to get back to God, but they won't do that if they think it is the realm of stubborn people who are incapable of reasonable argument. Leading by example is the best way to convince others to join your cause.
“bigger than any book Man has written about him” ?
Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God.
Do you believe in Zeus? Allah? There is no shortage of those who claim to speak for God. The real scripture of God is written in the fabric of the Universe itself. God has given us eyes to see and a mind with which to THINK. Truth is eternal but that does not mean man is ready for it yet. Can you imagine Genghis Khan with atom bombs? Our views of God have to change with time . Life is a test and like any good test tempting answers that are WRONG will be among the choices.It is the function of our mind to decide what to keep and what to reject.
God’s Word is truth, whether we believe it or not.
God magnified His Word above His name.
Does the word “jot and tittle” mean anything?
Study to show yourself approved.
I can recommend an E.W. Bullinger Study Bible as a start.
Good luck on your quest.
Ever consider that? Pray for America
More name calling, well done. I read 49 and quoted from it. It is a bunch of evolutionists who were lukewarm that they couldn’t prove it true but would not confirm the fraud. Even they admitted the skeptics could be right about the fraud, that’s the best you have is a paper by Darwinists agreeing a fraud was not a fraud?
You are worshiping a religion called atheism and won’t admit it for pride.
Pray for America
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.