Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Fiscal' Conservatism Needs 'Social' Conservatism
Jewish World Review ^ | 1-22-13 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 01/21/2013 9:48:38 PM PST by ReformationFan

For some years now, we have been told about a major division within American conservatism: fiscal conservatives vs. social conservatives.

This division is hurting conservatism and hurting America -- because the survival of American values depends on both fiscal and social conservatism. Furthermore, the division is logically and morally untenable. A conservative conserves all American values, not just economic ones.

By "social conservatism," I am referring to the second and third components of what I call the American Trinity -- liberty, "In God We Trust" and "E Pluribus Unum."

It is worth noting that a similar bifurcation does not exist on the left. One never hears the term "fiscal liberals." Why not? Because those who consider themselves liberals are liberal across the board -- fiscally and socially.

The left understands that values are a package. Apparently, many conservatives -- libertarians, for example -- do not. They think that we can sustain liberty while ignoring God and religion and ignoring American nationalism and exceptionalism.

It is true that small government and liberty are at the heart of the American experiment. But they are dependent on two other values: a God-based religious vigor in the society and the melting pot ideal.

Or, to put it another way, small government and fiscal conservatism will not survive the victory of social leftism.

The Founding Fathers made clear that liberty is dependent upon not only small government but also society's affirming God-based values. Not having imbibed the Enlightenment foolishness that people are basically good, the founders understood that in order for a society to prosper without big government, its citizens have to hold themselves accountable to something other than -- higher than -- the brute force of the state. That something is God and the Judeo-Christian religions that are its vehicle.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dennisprager; libertarianism; moralabsolutes; prager; socialconservatism; socialliberalism; virtue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-177 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj

“It’s that the establishment will insist on coronating that Zero bootlicking fat tub of $hit from New Jersey, Christie.”

I liked that so much, I just had to post it again.


61 posted on 01/22/2013 4:51:20 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Now I saw Ted Cruz on Sunday NBC MTP debate Schumer with Gregory as moderator and he did pretty good. He didnt say anything stupid (that would hurt other Republicans) and he even got Gregory to go after Schumer on the budget.

But really fun was the Morning Joe's comments Monday going into an absolute fit that Cruz would dare accuse Obama of using those kids deaths for political purposes(on the same MTP show_), that was entertaining, Mika is so proud of him. Great morning laugh.

62 posted on 01/22/2013 4:57:33 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
RE :”Mourdock was no crackpot. He was just inarticulate on the question of rape and frankly a effing retard for not having a good pat answer after Akin suicide bombed the GOP. “

Like I said in another comment, there seemed to be a delusional belief with Rs that 2012 would just be another 2010 easy win because only Republicans would vote.

What was missed maybe because so many are trapped in the bubble was that O and Dems were using all of it to turn out their vote, that 2012 was not a natural 2010.

Pathetically Angle even lost 2010.

63 posted on 01/22/2013 4:57:44 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

A 30 state strategy is OK, but its the 20 state that is a loser.


64 posted on 01/22/2013 5:00:26 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

I don’t think Socrates was a Christian, so what is your point again?


65 posted on 01/22/2013 5:23:14 AM PST by mngeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

And economic conservatives need to stop nominating people like Romney who have no credibility on social issues, due to capitulations on so-called gay marriage and abortion.

Plenty of blame all around.


66 posted on 01/22/2013 5:33:16 AM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99
RE :”And economic conservatives need to stop nominating people like Romney who have no credibility on social issues, due to capitulations on so-called gay marriage and abortion”

I was one of the few here to point out that Romney’s economic conservative message would not be found inspiring outside the GOP bubble, and it wasnt and isnt.
He was the last person I would have picked to argue for ‘tax cuts’.

I thought Romney worked well with the others I cited to blow the election, to turn out the Dem vote.

Many Republicans seemed to believe that 2012 would just be another 2010 and wouldnt require planning, skill or self control, then woke up surprised in Nov. The Dems stayed on message all neg against Rs ('they will take away your ...') and the Rs just all went their own ways own messages.

67 posted on 01/22/2013 5:45:13 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Daveinyork: “And how would you propose to choose those virtuous individuals who would manage that large government that will force us all to be virtuous?”

Your response is typical of the libertarians on this thread. Point out where I or other social conservatives are advocating big government to “force us all to be virtuous.” I’m only pointing out it’s impossible to have small government when the vast majority of citizens are not virtuous.

I’m not calling for federal dictates to force them to behave. However, that doesn’t mean all levels of government need to turn a blind eye to social ills. For example, support for marriage would be a good start. Letting communities set their own standards would be another. Eliminating programs that subsidize immoral behavior would be a biggie.

You seem to think socons are ready to break down your door to see if you’re watching porn or smoking a bit of weed. That’s not necessarily true. Some might, but most of the ones I know just want government to stop siding with the cultural barbarians.


68 posted on 01/22/2013 7:27:51 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
1). Traditionalists versus libertarians. Which sounds like social versus fiscal conservatism, but isn’t.
2). Religious versus nonreligious, agnostic, or, less often, atheist.
3). Hawk versus isolationist.

That's an interesting way of looking at the divide. I think, you're correct.

Not many candidates, or people even.. are on the same side of all three of those.

One thing I DO know: Republicans CANNOT win without full-throated support from BOTH sides. Seems to me, the Social Conservatives are the ones who've shown they are most likely to "stay home".. since, they are voting on 'principle', not simply 'interests'.

Problem is... they rarely get candidates that truly support their positions.

And, anyway... what ARE their positions? Personal? Or, do they require a government mandate for their personal beliefs?

69 posted on 01/22/2013 7:56:50 AM PST by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

“Point out where I or other social conservatives are advocating big government to “force us all to be virtuous.” I’m only pointing out it’s impossible to have small government when the vast majority of citizens are not virtuous.”

What would you have this medium sized government do about the unvirtuous? I say “medium sized” because you said you don’t advocate big government, and you say that it’s impossible to have a small government. The only other choices are medium sized, or none at all. Surely you don’t advocate anarchy, do you?


70 posted on 01/22/2013 7:59:22 AM PST by Daveinyork (."Trusting government with power and money is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy; GOPsterinMA

imagine a group of libertarian, grass-roots militias taking on the Nazi war machine. You cannot. Nazis could only be defeated by a similar organized, central-command modern military. Similarly, where is the leadership of the conservative establishment?

Fact is, the grassroots right has boycotted the presidential primaries since Buchanan’s brief surge in ‘96. Which was lead by delusional incompetents.

Bush coopted the grassroots in 2000. My error, of course, is that I have ignored the Paulista crowd. In rural NH and ME, the backbone of the anti-RINO resistance up here, the Paulistas soak up all the energy ... earning the support of people who normally support Conservative Regulars. Many McCain ‘08 rural folks in the NH primary (who led the charge against Romney in ‘08) ended up with Ron Paul in ‘12 ... (as strange as that may sound).

There is so much national party control over local events in the process that Presidential politics has ceased to be interesting to me.

Names for ‘16: Rand Paul. Sarah. Walker. The only conservative grassroots who will play ball early are the Evangelicals in Iowa and the Paulistas in New Hampshire and NV. And then Dr. Dobson can go to SC to tell everyone that he is uncommitted.

God have mercy on us. The UBSA. The United Bankrupt States of America.


71 posted on 01/22/2013 7:59:53 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mngeek; savagesusie
I don’t think Socrates was a Christian

it would have been very peculiar for Socrates to be a Christian.
72 posted on 01/22/2013 8:03:53 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
But Social Conservatives must learn to stop nominating crackpots that give away easy Senate wins like Akin, Mourdock and Angle did, or at least teach them they must not help Dems by saying stupid stuff.

As soon as RINOs learn to stop nominating liberals like Mitt Romney, who give away easy wins against the worst President in American History, or at least teach them that they must not help Marxists by refusing to go on the offensive against them.

73 posted on 01/22/2013 8:08:39 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
RE :”As soon as RINOs learn to stop nominating liberals like Mitt Romney, who give away easy wins against the worst President in American History, or at least teach them that they must not help Marxists by refusing to go on the offensive against them. “

The R primary was another mess so Romney had little trouble picking them off one by one to get it.
And Romney played uber-conservative in the primary.

But Romney was not responsible for the Rs losing seats in both Houses. The GOP had bigger problems than that.

Romney was not responsible for Angle losing to Reid 2010. That was an unnecessary disaster.

I noticed the talk radio club warmed up to Romney.

74 posted on 01/22/2013 8:18:46 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT; Impy; fieldmarshaldj

Again with Sarah Palin.
And again, I say: “You outta you mind.” NEVER...GONNA...HAPPEN. EVER.

Scott Walker or Rande Paul? Now you’re talking.

The Paulistas should be welcomed and not shunned on the whole. Why? Libertarians should be at home in the GOP. Libertarians (emphasis on the “Liberty”) are not statists, unlike the RATS.

That should serve as a (the) overwhelming commonality between Conservatives and Libertarians.


75 posted on 01/22/2013 9:01:55 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Akin was the result of a three way split, Palin and the tea party didn’t succeed in defeating him in the primary, and Palin couldn’t persuade him to drop out after his awkward missteps.

The conservatives have been delivering the only positive news in the GOP in recent elections, doing great, while the GOPe keeps finding disasters in their efforts.

While conservatives were giving us Cruz and a our only Senate seat pickup, Rove was sucking up hundreds of millions of GOP dollars towards creating losing candidates.


76 posted on 01/22/2013 9:08:58 AM PST by ansel12 (Cruz said "conservatives trust Sarah Palin that if she says this guy is a conservative, that he is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U; gleeaikin
Any there for having pot for personal use had a rap sheet longer than your arm already,

On which the law enforcement system has already had its say - so how is it relevant to their having pot for personal use?

and likely were busted for probation violations.

Have any evidence that this is likely (rather than merely possible)?

77 posted on 01/22/2013 9:14:02 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA
Libertarians should be at home in the GOP.

Really, just end conservatism and become lefties and stop fighting the left, that is the GOP that you envision?

Become anti-God, anti-conservatism democrats, except keep conservative economics?

Become more Romney like?

78 posted on 01/22/2013 9:15:16 AM PST by ansel12 (Cruz said "conservatives trust Sarah Palin that if she says this guy is a conservative, that he is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

What do I want? Well I hope more individuals would get their heads screwed on right, make peace with God, and stop destroying the country. I don’t think that’s likely to occur, but that’s my great hope.

When I said we couldn’t have small government with immoral citizens, I was simply stating fact. That doesn’t mean I, personally, don’t want small government. I do. I just don’t think we’re ever going to return to anything like that, because most Americans today are immoral. Government is their god.

It’s going to have to come crashing down before anything can change, and that crash is going to be bad for everyone. If a new American republic rises from the ashes, a highly improbable outcome, a whole lot of Americans will end up dying before it does. We’re more likely to end up with a truly totalitarian state. I hope for a softer landing, a gradual decline versus a crash, but I doubt we’ll get one.

You see, you’re confusing my hopes with my observations. I hope for the best. I observe we aren’t likely to get anything like it. Neither are libertarians. Both of our hopes are foolish given the reality. Look at the joker who was just sworn in for another four. Does that look like a country headed toward much smaller government?


79 posted on 01/22/2013 9:16:54 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
As soon as RINOs learn to stop nominating liberals like Mitt Romney, who give away easy wins against the worst President in American History, or at least teach them that they must not help Marxists by refusing to go on the offensive against them.

You are right of course.

Romney has damaged the GOP deeply, he may have broken it.

80 posted on 01/22/2013 9:20:17 AM PST by ansel12 (Cruz said "conservatives trust Sarah Palin that if she says this guy is a conservative, that he is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson