Posted on 10/18/2012 8:43:33 AM PDT by TigerClaws
A not so undecided undecided voter. At 10:12 AM EDT Wednesday on CNN, faux undecided voter Susan Katz, who had asked Mitt Romney at the debate the night before how hes different from George W. Bush, told Carol Costello she voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and plans to do so again this year because I saw in President Obama someone who has ripened with time who deserves another four years to see his vision through. (Ripened?)
(Excerpt) Read more at mrc.org ...
Once she opened her pie hole and spewed forth her “question”, only the terminally naive could beleve this limo liberal was “undecided”.
The real prize goes (again!) to Crowley, for picking this obviously biased woman and allowing her to ask this trap of a question. It was a setup from the outset.
And yet Romney handled it pretty well! When you’re unfairly dealt a public injustice and you overcome the obstacle and move on without whining, those silent observers out there take notice.
More and more I’m believing the enemedia were too clever by half, and their gaming of this debate will backfire on them.
They were undecided since they took their Obama buttons off when they sat down. Nobody in America is as stupid as the Commie Network thinks they are.
Pray for America
Zippy won in 2008 by running against Bush. So he is trying to do the same thing again. This is pathetic.
The Dems and the media are corrupt on so many levels, that sometimes you don’t even know where to start.
1. Not really an undecided voter.
2. The fact that this question was chosen by Crowley to be asked shows amazing bias.
3. No equivalent question asked of 0bama.
I would bet money that either the questions were handed to 0bama in advance or that they were actually written by the 0bama campaign and given to the “undecided voters.” If the former, I’m sure that the 0bama campaign got to pick which ones would be asked.
“In order for good to prevail over evil, good must be very very good”
In any reasonable accounting Romney prevailed over Øbozo (at least so far).
Susan Katz, who had asked Mitt Romney at the debate the night before how hes different from George W. Bush.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I kept waiting and waiting for the follow up question:
President Obama; please explain how you are different than Jimmy Carter?
(Strangely enough, it never came. Gee I wonder why.)
In this case “undecided” means 95% chance of voting for Obama but hasn’t completely ruled out the possibility of a Romney vote.
Yeah, I was going to suggest banana bread too.
I wish some like Malkin would do a followup on all these "undecideds" and find out who they really are. I have seen different comments indicating that a number of these people were plants. I know it's obvious but I would like to see the actual details documented and published as a group so that in the future we can have these fraudulent town hall debates ended.
It was clear that this twit was a fraud from the start.
I am an undecided voter and after witnessing the failed policies of Fidel A. Castro, who is of the same party as Mr. Obama, I would like to know what makes you, Mr. President, any different from Fidel A. Castro the Cuban communist revolutionary and politician, what policies makes you any different then Fidel A. Castro?
Add to that the Equal Pay voter and you really begin to question how “undecided” are these voters.
Candy Creepy Crawley!!
As soon as Katz began her question, I knew she was a plant. I did a cursory search on her but could find nothing concrete but I would bet she’s a Soros sponsored community activist of some sort. I hope it comes out that she’s actually an avowed communist.
Is this the CODE PINK lady that was in the group???
There are very few Conservatives on Long Island - and I know both of them, (and neither was at the debate....)
Ripened like a dead armadillo on the side of the road IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.