1 posted on
09/03/2012 9:02:53 PM PDT by
Racehorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Racehorse
They are throwing the election. One has to wonder why.
2 posted on
09/03/2012 9:04:18 PM PDT by
Psalm 144
( "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. The party left me." Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: Racehorse
If gay marriage is so wonderful, why won’t hillary or barry come out of the closet?
3 posted on
09/03/2012 9:05:10 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Racehorse
It’s like, “We dare you neanderthals to vote against us!”
5 posted on
09/03/2012 9:09:33 PM PDT by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Racehorse
The majority of black Christians do not support gay marriage.
6 posted on
09/03/2012 9:14:09 PM PDT by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: Racehorse
The Dem platform would place no limits at all on abortion, the most extreme position ever.
7 posted on
09/03/2012 9:14:18 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Racehorse
I think it meant “histrionic”
9 posted on
09/03/2012 9:16:12 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Racehorse
To: Racehorse
A cultural milestone on the road to hell.
11 posted on
09/03/2012 9:17:08 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Racehorse
Oh yeah. I bet this is going to go over great with the Longshoremen and the swinging d*ck union guys.
That'll get them out to vote for sure.....
12 posted on
09/03/2012 9:17:47 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: Racehorse
What a bunch of buffoons. They’re actually going to go up against the Chik-fil-A Effect in their national platform.
Good bye, Dummies.
14 posted on
09/03/2012 9:19:53 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Racehorse
Dems to adopt historic stance on marriageThey are fundamentally transforming it.
To: Racehorse
“The platform declaration could spark political blowback”
Looks like they mean it.
To: Racehorse
Black and Hispanics must be good with gay marriage and free abortion on demand.
To: Racehorse
A certain line from “Tropic Thunder” comes to mind. The DNC just went Full, well, you know...
25 posted on
09/03/2012 9:48:11 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Racehorse
The Democrats must be insane to do this. Just about everywhere same-sex marriages was put to a decision by the voters in an election, it has lost by significant margins.
27 posted on
09/03/2012 9:52:15 PM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: Racehorse
**major party to endorse same-sex marriage in its platform.**
Adding to the plank in their platform that supports abortion.
God will be the judge.
30 posted on
09/03/2012 10:05:03 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Racehorse
Eight years after California Sen. Dianne Feinstein said the push for legalizing same-sex marriage was “too much, too fast, too soon,” the Democratic Party will make history Tuesday when it is expected to be the first major party to endorse same-sex marriage in its platform. This action is consistent with the premise that leftists, liberals, and Democrats have disordered minds. It is also consistent with the foundational thesis that men and women are 100% interchangeable. That is also what feminism is all about. That is what same sex marriage is all about.
We are experiencing biblical times.
42 posted on
09/04/2012 2:29:45 AM PDT by
olezip
To: Racehorse
““By doing this, the Democratic Party is basically telling voters in places like North Carolina and Florida that they’re a bunch of bigots,” said consultant Frank Schubert”
Right, not exactly a smart move...
To: Racehorse
It’s so historic, North Carolinians rejected it.
To: Racehorse
Look at all the dictionaries of law foe the last 800 years.
They will define “marriage” as the union of one man and one woman.
Look at all the ecclesiastical writings of the last 1000 years.
They will define “marriage” as the union of one man and one woman.
Look at the samples of the best poetry and prose for the last 2000 years.
They will define “marriage” as the union of one man and one woman.
So call it whatever they want. Call it “queerage”. Call it whatever.
But trying to change language will never change whether or not it is “a social norm”.
And it will never be a social norm because it is not a biological, God given, scientific norm.
So much of the homosexual agenda makes me think that they are actually deep;y ashamed by their behavior.
45 posted on
09/04/2012 4:14:12 AM PDT by
djf
(The barbarian hordes will ALWAYS outnumber the clean-shaven. And they vote.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson