Posted on 07/05/2012 9:53:40 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.
Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.
Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”
To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.
Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.
As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”
When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Never have seen him post anything to support the repeated assertions.
They nailed Al Capone on tax evasion.
How many law enforcement agents did Capone murder compared to Obama’s tally of Fast+Furious murders?
This filthy moslem communist criminal is dirtier than Capone.
And his paper trail proves it.
Capone never betrayed the United States.
That’s a hint why Omoslem’s stolen SS# is important.
I’m not expressing myself very clearly, and I apologize for that.
Many Americans, mostly but not exclusively on the left, react to anything they think is wrong or inappropriate by deciding it is therefore unconstitutional.
The problem with this notion is that our Constitution is, by purpose, a quite limited document. It has little or nothing to say about most issues. It was not intended to be a “fundamental law” replacing the details of the common law. It was by intent basically a rule book for how decisions would be made by the people’s reps, not a definition of what those decisions would be.
The Constitution says nothing about abortion, so leftists succeeded in getting the Court to go into mystical mode and find abortion to be a constitution right, as outlined in the previously unsuspected penumbras and emanations visible only to themselves. Similar approaches have taken entire aspects of potential legislation off the table by making them constitutional issues.
This is bad news, for our government and for the Constitution. Trying to make it do everything just means it can’t do what it was set up to do, provide that framework within which the people make decisiions. Instead, all decision will be made by unelected, lifetime tenure judges, as they are the only ones who can interpret the Constitution.
If that’s what you want, try to get judges to find some contortion by which misuse of a SS# makes a candidate for president ineligible for the office. You won’t find any such judge of course, but if you did it would be another nail in the coffin of the real Constitution..
End rant.
I don’t think he is allowed to work in the US if his SS# is fraudulent.
I asked if anyone could demonstrate why it was unconstitutional.
Can you?
We've had four years now, and AFAIK not one of the 50 states has made proof of eligibility a prerequisite for being on its presidential ballot. All we needed was one state, and we couldn't come up with that.
Can you expound on this? What is the significance of A,B,C, etc.
Sigh. 38 comments and not a single one skeptical (that I could find, anyway.) Check snopes.com and you’ll get a quite rational explanation for why Obama could have ended up with a SS number that looks like it was intended for Connecticut.
Short version: Since the early 70’s, Zip Codes have been used and yes, the first 3 numbers identified the state, but all it would take is mistyping, or misreading, or just sloppily writing, the first number of Obama’s zip code, which is something like 98164, and inputting (for any one of the 3 reasons cited above) 08164, and out would pop a Connecticut SS number.
Now, that might not have happened, but, geez, people should at least consider the possibility, especially when the source is WND. This is very likely tin-foil hat material.
Incidentally, Snopes also addresses the dead guy who’s number Obama supposedly had pilfered on his behalf. Let’s beat the guy with stuff he’s really done, or attempted. There’s certainly plenty of legitimate material out there.
I assume this means he’s also here illegally. Look for an executive order pardon for all illegal immigrants born the same year as him and citizenship will be retro-active.
Also, look for an executive order making EVERYONE eligible to run for president...retro-active, of course. He could do this and the republicans would strongly object and may even write a letter or two.
He’s gotten his way with every EO he’s written, so, why not a few more.
Exceptionally well-thought-out, well-stated, and vitally important to consider. Thank you.
Aw shucks, I take all that time to re-format my post and then you go and take all my fun away and de-bunk it. lol
Still want to know how he got a Connecticut social security #.
Obama would still qualify as a presidential candidate, regardless of the alleged SS# fraud. If anything ever came of this, it would be handled through impeachment.
Bug-off.
The Ludwig story may or may not be correct but Snopes consists of two people (a married couple) sitting in an apartment somewhere giving out their personal opinions as fact.
That you quote them as some objective-reliable source just tells me you are a moron.
Thanks. Haven’t gotten a lot of support on this issue. :)
I’ve also read that Omoslem might actually be Bari Shabazz, relative of Malcolm X.
That theory is consistent with needing a fake SS#.
Google that name and enjoy the background story on the mysterious Shabazz who skipped his Hawaii court date after a huge car accident (which also explains the long scars running down the side of Omoslem’s scalp). He never showed up to “present NY drivers license” as ordered.
Oh wait, here’s the link:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html
“Short version: Since the early 70’s, Zip Codes have been used and yes, the first 3 numbers identified the state, but all it would take is mistyping, or misreading, or just sloppily writing, the first number of Obama’s zip code,”
Spare us your convoluted excuse making for Dear Reader.
Who cares if it’s unconstitutional?
Nail the crook to the wall in any manner possible.
As of last week, it’s apparently “constitutional” to force every breathing human to buy product xyz, and penalize/jail them if they dont feel like it.
This is true as per Ancestry.com. I researched this on my own quite some time ago and found that Ludwig's number was completely different. In face I came upon the same Ancestry.com "image" that snopes is using in the link you provided.
I should also note that the imagine snopes uses with Ludwig's information is from Ancestry.com.
That being said, I'm not going to take it upon myself to use a genealogy website to legally discredit an attorney who obviously has different information which is obviously what Snopes used.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.