Posted on 06/22/2012 7:07:57 PM PDT by neverdem
‘Here’s a little secret,” Keith Olbermann told viewers in 2010. “When racist white guys get together and they don’t want to be caught using any of the popular epithets that are in use every day in this country about black people . . . the racist white guys resort to euphemisms and code words.”
At least Olbermann acknowledged that not all white people are racist; but three and a half years into the first “post-racial” presidency, one might get that impression. Take the list Olbermann enumerated on air: “Cocky, flippant, punk, and especially, arrogant.” Last week, Congressional Black Caucus executive director Angela Rye added cool to the list: “Even cool, the term cool, could in some ways be deemed racial.”
Liberals have spent the past four years tearing out page after page of Merriam-Webster. “Articulate” and “bright” were forbidden early in the 2008 primary season, with Obama defenders dredging up a classy Chris Rock joke that “articulate” is “some s**t you say about retarded people that can talk.” But CNN, Legal Affairs, and other media outlets had bestowed the same compliment on John Edwards during his meteoric rise years before. A 2004 Slate headline called Edwards “bright and articulate and really, really youthful,” while Steve Benen wrote at the Carpetbagger Report in 2003 that “Edwards is a very bright, articulate, and aggressive lawmaker.”
In April, Mitt Romney unveiled a new campaign slogan at a stop in Ohio: “Obama Isn’t Working.” Racist, cried Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher: It evokes “the stereotype of the ‘lazy,’ ‘shiftless’ black man.” Van Jones, Obama’s erstwhile “green-jobs czar,” said in a web chat that the slogan set off “racial fire alarms.” But as the Romney campaign explained, the slogan was a tribute to Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative party, whose “Labour Isn’t Working” poster, designed in 1978 when the Iron Lady was running for prime minister, was named by Campaign magazine the poster of the century: Its image of a winding unemployment line “pointed to Britain’s economic climate of rising unemployment, rising inflation, and a growing national debt.” Sound familiar?
Criticism of Obama policy is also racist. During debates over the president’s health-care overhaul, NPR claimed that “a sharp divide [exists] between whites who have a liberal outlook on racial issues compared with those who have a conservative outlook on racial issues.” Meanwhile, responding to South Carolina congressman Joe Wilson’s “You lie!” outburst during the president’s 2009 health-care address to Congress, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd wrote, “But, fair or not, what I heard was an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy!”
Reflecting on C-SPAN on Obama’s election to the presidency, filmmaker Michael Moore said Obama succeeded among young voters “because they’re not as racist as the previous generations,” implying that all those older white folks who rejected Obama at the polls were racist.
And if liberals can find racism in Obama’s electoral victories, they can certainly locate it in his defeats. After a federal prisoner received more than 40 percent of the vote against Obama in May’s West Virginia primary, state Democrats blamed the racist voters. But, of course, in a closed Democratic primary, those could not be bigoted Republican voters. The state Democrats condemned their own.
The Left hears so many “dog whistles” in today’s public discourse that one fears to say anything at all. And that’s the point. Liberals use the accusation of racism as a cudgel to cow political opponents. But the refusal by so many on the left to approach with honesty disagreements on questions of policy indicates intellectual bankruptcy, and many are growing savvy to the invocation of race to forestall substantive debate. Furthermore, what anti-black racism does exist in America could not possibly account for the nearly 50 percent of voters who disapprove of the president’s performance, or his policies’ frequent failure in the courts, or his poor performance in his own party’s primaries.
In his book Abuse of Language, Abuse of Power, Josef Pieper wrote, “The dignity of the word, to be sure, consists in this: through the word is accomplished what no other means can accomplish, namely, communication based on reality.”
Liberals have spent the last four years manipulating and excising words because they refuse to confront reality.
But then, we already knew that.
— Ian Tuttle is an editorial intern at National Review.
The story as it relates to FR:
1. Early in the Clinton impeachment process, Miss Maureen started writing negative stuff about Der Schlickmeister.
2. The Clinton gang recruited Michael Douglas to help get Maureen's mind "right".
3. She responded by starting to defend De33r Schlickmeister.
4. Dougla and Dowd were an "item" for several months. Until Clinton was acquitted by the Senate.
5. Whereupon Douglas dropped Dowd like a used orange peel...and married Catherine Zeta-Jones.
6. As a sign of compassion for the jilted Maureen's unrequited love, a FReeper began appending photos of CZJ to every Maureen Dowd thread.
The practice lives on today, 13 years after the fact.
It is normal for all species to mistrust those that are not of their clan, brood, herd, pack, species (and so forth).
It is a normal adaptation that all species developed for self preservation.
Yes we humans are all prejudiced. It is just that most people can get over that fact. Those that can’t are Bigots.
I’m sick to death of the never ending taunts and sharp sticks in the eye from the left. Why don’t they just declare war on us and get this thing started already?
I’d prefer an honest bare knuckled fight to this endless schoolyard crap.
Tell me about it. My family thinks that I've been kidnapped by right-wingers and hypnotically programmed to be a 'race traitor'.
I'm a complete embarrassment to them now. They speak of me only in hushed tones of fear, anger, and sadness.
Actually, it's not quite that bad, but darn near. They still have a hard time with the fact that I voted for GWB twice(!), and chose Sarah Palin over Obama.
Leading to an epic meltdown. It was great!
MoDo gradually spiraled out of control over a period of a few years and then went nuclear on her own family between Thanksgiving and Christmas two or three years ago -- and the NYT actually published it: published the rantings and ravings of an emotionally-distraught middle-aged woman as she went supernova on life, family, and most of all, her disappointed hopes in Michael Douglas, who went off and happily married the gorgeous and intelligent CZJ and never looked back.
Personally, I think the NYT editors' decision to go ahead and run with MoDo's explosion will be a case study in journo schools for some time to come.
It has been an FR "rule" ever since, that whosoever mentions Maureen Dowd in the forum, owes us a pic of the beauteous CZJ.
I never heard that!! Source! Cite! Links! <Oh, do please dish!!!>
LOL
euphemisms and code words. we need to call in the thought police. One code word we use for you d###head
Woohoo! Now it’s out the open. Can I wear the hood and sheet to dinner with my moreno Latino family? Freedom!
We will not be free as long as we care what names we are called. My response to being called a racist is to now say "OK. So?"
Because they know they would lose in a straight-up fight. That's why.
If you make somebody feel guilty enough, it's easier to get him to come along quietly to his execution.
Because they know they would lose in a straight-up fight. That’s why.
In war, you do not fight the way your enemy wishes. That’s something we on the Right need to understand and practice.
Fewer and fewer Americans (of every political stripe) are falling into the guilt trap these days. People can only take being made wrong for things they have no causation over for so long. Like the race card, and the blame Bush card, the guilt card is being accepted at fewer and fewer places.
The left had better hope and pray that they never push us over the edge into a real fight. It would be over within a week, and their very existence would likely be outlawed.
Outlaw the left. What a comforting concept.
So?
Absolutely right. Many years ago, I started responding that way, and then challenge the fool to discuss facts. That ends a lot of useless chatter and I don't really care how they wish to stereotype me anyway.
We definitely need a like button on FR!
The Right needs to understand that we're in a fight, and fight to win. They use our own tax money against us, with their agents being government employees, welfare recipients, recipients of government grants, and union people who depend on the government to secure their jobs and guarantee them well-above-market-wages.
Step one would be to deny the Left its funding and logistics. Cut their funding. Eliminate union privileges. Make them get real jobs.
Using this logic then every black person who voted for Obama did so because John McCain is white. Ergo all blacks are racist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.