Posted on 06/04/2012 10:25:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
Mayor Bloomberg is a wretched human being. He’s an ultra-rich limousine liberal who wants to impose his views on ordinary people.
I’ve previously written about his statist efforts to ban bake sales, and I’ve noted with mixed feelings his proposal to tell food stamp recipients what they’re allowed to buy.
Now he wants to criminalize large sodas. Holman Jenkins writes about this silly idea in the Wall Street Journal.
Mike Bloomberg’s move to regulate the size of sodas sold in his city illustrates why it’s a good thing he is a mayor of New York and not the czar of all the Russias. American big cities tend to be one-party states to begin with, but at least their totalitarian impulses end up being merely cute because they’re so easy to evade. Under the Bloomberg plan, any cup or bottle of sugary drink larger than 16 ounces at a public venue would be verboten, beginning early next year. You’ll still be able to buy as much Coke as you want in a supermarket. Go home and pour yourself a bucketful. As Mr. Bloomberg himself was the first to note, you’ll also still be free to buy two medium drinks in place of today’s Big Gulp at ballgames, theaters, delis and other venues where the ban would be in effect.
But Mr. Jenkins doesn’t just mock Bloomberg for being a food nanny. He also makes an important point about public policy.
Here is the ultimate justification for the Bloomberg soft-drink ban, not to mention his smoking ban, his transfat ban, and his unsuccessful efforts to enact a soda tax and prohibit buying high-calorie drinks with food stamps: The taxpayer is picking up the bill. Call it the growing chattelization of the beneficiary class under government health-care programs. Bloombergism is a secular trend. Los Angeles has sought to ban new fast-food shops in neighborhoods disproportionately populated by Medicaid recipients, Utah to increase Medicaid copays for smokers, Arizona to impose a special tax on Medicaid recipients who smoke or are overweight. …So perhaps the famous “broccoli” hypothetical during the Supreme Court ObamaCare debate was not so fanciful after all. It flows naturally from the state’s fiscal responsibility for your health that it will try to regulate your behavior, even mandating vegetable consumption.
Or, to summarize, the view of politicians is that the government can tell you how to live because it is paying for your healthcare. This is Mitchell’s Law on steroids! One bad government policy leading to another awful government policy.
And it’s not just Mayor Bloomberg pushing these policies. Other politicians have similar proposals, though it’s quite likely that their main motive is to collect more tax revenue since they are focused on how to tax various “bad” foods.
But let’s try not to be overly depressed. Here’s an amusing cartoon on the topic.
I’m glad that people are mocking Mayor Bloomberg and the rest of the Food Nazis. And it’s good to see that the soft drink industry is fighting back, as seen by this Super Bowl commercial.
Maybe some day we’ll get to the point where people have to smuggle food past government agents. This may sound absurd, but it’s already happening in Norway.
He can go to war against Mountain Dew but can’t get the rapists and drug addicts of the Occupy Movement out of Zucotti Park.
I’m surprised there havent been protests about ordinary people’s lives being controlled by one of the 1% richest.
There is a common thread that runs through all of the great totalitarian movements--including so-called modern "Liberalsim." It is a Compulsion For Uniformity, and certainly trying to dictate a uniformity in human diets, is part & parcel of such neurotic dogma.
This does not stop, until it either goes to social chaos, or we stop it. The corrupt power to program other peoples lives is addictive. When you couple compulsion with addiction, your victims are in very serious trouble.
William Flax
Keep the government away from my Islets of Langerhans!
I’d reply, but I first will check with Gov. Bloomer to see what I should say. He has all the answers. Knows what we should and should not eat. He knows whether or not we should have a 2nd ammendment. His mind is all-powerful, all knowing... it’s like a 3.41 brains really. Such intelligence, gained by virtue of being voted Governor, knows no bounds! The TV series ‘That’s Increible’ is being recast to do a seven week mini-series on Bloomie’s mega-super-computer of a brain.
I better get back to work now, provided that’s what Mayor B thinks would be best, because I sure as heck can’t be expected to take personal responsibility for anything. Yep, must have some limo-liberal statist tell us what to do....
I think it’s wonderful that Mayor Bloomie has gone on record saying New Yorkers aren’t intelligent enough to make basic health decisions.
Now we need to keep those same people from voting in federal elections.
I hope the papparazzi follow him around. Sooner or later, they will get a picture of him drinking a giant drink, or having something unhealthy such as a hot dog in his mouth, or eating other junk food.
Some say he does like wieners.
I think I almost like Obama better than Gloomberg. If I lived in NY I would have voted for the regular democrat just to get rid of him.
“Do as I say, not as I do!”
Just ridiculous.
“”Now we need to keep those same people from voting in federal elections.””
And NYC elections too!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.