Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul supporters create delegate mischief
The Washington Times ^ | May 1, 2012 | Ralph Z. Hallow

Posted on 05/02/2012 7:48:18 AM PDT by no dems

Mitt Romney may be the presumptive GOP nominee, but Rep. Ron Paul of Texas is quietly racking up some organizational victories that could complicate Mr. Romney’s coronation at the Republican Convention in Tampa, Fla.

Exploiting party rules, loyalists for the congressman from Texas in recent days have engineered post-primary organizing coups in states such as Louisiana and Alaska, confirming what party regulars say would be an effort to grab an outsized role in the convention and the party’s platform deliberations.

In Massachusetts, Paul loyalists over the weekend helped block more than half of Mr. Romney’s preferred nominees from being named delegates at state party caucuses — even though Mr. Romney won his home state’s primary with 72 percent of the vote. Many state GOP establishment figures, including longtime state Republican National Committee member Ron Kaufman, won’t be going to Tampa in August as official delegates.

Paul, “is doing more with less than any modern presidential campaign in recent memory,” said Doug Wead, a Paul campaign adviser. “More surprises coming,” Mr. Wead blogged this week. “It means that Ron Paul will be a factor in Tampa.”

In DeKalb County, Ga., Gingrich won the state’s March 6 primary, but the selection of delegates to the national convention takes place in subsequent party caucuses. So Paul loyalists can run for delegate slots ostensibly as supporters of Mr. Gingrich or another candidate.

In Alaska — where Mr. Paul came in third in the primary — his supporters organized to elect two Paul loyalists as chairman and co-chairman of the state party, beating out candidates backed by the Alaska GOP establishment.

In Alaska, tea-party-backed 2010 GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller and wife Kathleen struck an apparent alliance with Mr. Paul’s team, and she won election March 27 as a delegate to the Tampa convention.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: delegate; paul; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
I remember in 1988, when "The Moral Majority" folks and the Pat Robertson supporters gave the Establishment Republicans holy heck in States like Michigan. I love it when the long-time Party operatives, who think their positions are assigned by divine decree, have to sit on the sidelines and watch new activists, from outside the Establishment, run the show.
1 posted on 05/02/2012 7:48:27 AM PDT by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems

I wonder if this will kill any hope of a political future for Joe Miller in Alaska.


2 posted on 05/02/2012 7:52:08 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Mitt Romney may be the presumptive GOP nominee

I see this a lot, especially with regards to the GOP.

Shouldn't the correct word be "presumed GOP nominee". It seems to me "presumptive GOP nominee" implies that he is unjustifiably self-presuming the nomination, rather than that everyone else is presuming he will be the nominee.
3 posted on 05/02/2012 7:56:09 AM PDT by chrisser (Starve the Monkeys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Paul and his supporters are spitting in the wind. Romney and the “Republican Establishment” will control the convention just like they have controlled the entire primary process up to now and guaranteed no other candidate stood a chance. Paul chance of staging a successful coup at the convention is about as likely as a outside candidate staging a coup in the old Soviet Union, that is to say impossible...
4 posted on 05/02/2012 8:02:35 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Many state GOP establishment figures, including longtime state Republican National Committee member Ron Kaufman, won’t be going to Tampa in August as official delegates.
________________________________________________

Oh dear...

The Romney Loyalists arent invited to the coronation ..


5 posted on 05/02/2012 8:05:44 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Who is left standing? Romney, or Paul...

This Is not a difficult choice to make.

Pro- abortion or pro- life?
Pro- bigger government or pro-Constitution?

If Willard wins the GOP nod, Obama wins re-election.


6 posted on 05/02/2012 8:09:30 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Ron Paul supporters biggest problem is...Ron Paul.


7 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:28 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

It sure pees on their little, cozy closed campfire doesn’t it?


8 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:51 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Study closely socialist Hugo Chavez' usage of 'popular masses' in the streets to thwart 1992 coup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

In Alaska — where Mr. Paul came in third in the primary — his supporters organized to elect two Paul loyalists as chairman and co-chairman of the state party, beating out candidates backed by the Alaska GOP establishment.
______________________________________________

“candidates backed by the Alaska GOP establishment.”

again more Romney Loyalists who get to stay home and watch it on TV...

You have to give Ron Paul his due...

He must have some people with good organizational skills...

Even Willard with all his deep pockets couldnt buy that kind of maneuver...

Willie Mitty could have been beaten or at least had less votes delegates etc..

Too much caution and fear...


9 posted on 05/02/2012 8:18:21 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Paul, “is doing more with less than any modern presidential campaign in recent memory,” said Doug Wead, a Paul campaign adviser.

For those of you who don't know Wead's history, he was one of the big shots in Amway back in the late '70s and 80's.

10 posted on 05/02/2012 8:21:39 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

is about as likely as a
__________________________________

Oh I dunno...

My mother used to tell me the story of Sir Francis Drake and the Spanish Armada...


11 posted on 05/02/2012 8:29:22 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I say good for them.


12 posted on 05/02/2012 8:30:02 AM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Excellent news, paul maybe a little nutty, but if he is giving the GOPe fits then I say more power to him. Plus alot of his followers are Tea Party like people that want smaller government and less spending.


13 posted on 05/02/2012 8:41:08 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Rather than say much, I'll just post a link and a quote from the "about" page of the folks that are now half the delegation here...

Massachusetts Blue Republicans

"We are Democrats and Independents. We are registering Republican for this election season to nominate Ron Paul. With our numbers, we can join the "Ron Paul rEVOLution", win the delegate positions to the Republican National Convention and absolutely ensure that Ron Paul becomes the nominee, and then, the President."

14 posted on 05/02/2012 8:55:30 AM PDT by C210N (Wanted: Tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems; All

Maybe he is attempting to force Mitt to pick his son for the VP slot. It would not be a bad move if it happened. Imagine the voice Paul will have in Tampa if he is able to hijack 20% to 40% of Romney’s delegates.

If only Newt had been half as organized as Paul was before he decided to run. Then maybe we would be discussing a Gingrich vs the Muslim in Chief race instead.

Just my 2cents, for what it’s worth.....


15 posted on 05/02/2012 9:07:14 AM PDT by OneVike ((Just a Christian waiting to go home) internet ID:: impeachobamanow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

I appreciate your post. I love learning and being intellectually challenged. And, I think your are correct in your assessment here. Never even thought about it. Thanks.

no dems


16 posted on 05/02/2012 9:07:30 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

If Willard wins the GOP nod, Obama wins re-election.
_____________________________________________________________

Don’t count on it. Mitt Romney wants this so bad he can taste it. He’s been running for President for 4 years. He is hungry. He has the money. He has the organization. He has 6 million Mormon foot soldiers. The Mormon church has $$$$$...much dinero. He proved in the Primary Process that he will do what it takes to win. And, flipping the coin over, many people who voted for Obama wish they could take their vote back. And, they will do so on November 6, 2012. I loathe the Clintons, but Obama even makes Bill and Hill seem palatable. He is much despised. I could give you more reasons why I think Romney will win, but it would be too lengthy.


17 posted on 05/02/2012 9:16:46 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Re: Your tagline: The Marxist Muslim hates you more than the Moderate Mormon.


18 posted on 05/02/2012 9:20:29 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I wanted Michelle Bachman to win, she didn’t. I wanted Herman Cain to win he didn’t. I wanted Rick Santorum to win then he stuck his foot in his mouth many times and I decided I wasn’t a Rick Santorum guy. I would have gladly voted for him in the general. I used to love Gingrich but he has not aged well, he has become somewhat cantankerous. I have supposed that Newt was the brightest of the bunch but maybe Paul is the brightest after all. There is a lot to like about Paul, but, he would not be able to win the general election. He has said too many dumb sounding things, just like Santorum and Newt.

For Bachman, Santorum and Newt it has come time to support Romney and they are. The time for back biting and complaining is over. The Money RINO guy has it sewed up. Either Romney wins or Obama wins. I am not one of those people who jump out of everything just because MY guy didn’t make it.

This country cannot take another Obama presidency and expect to survive anything like what we know of it today.

When your cousin begged you as a young person to go on a blind date with someone who had a great personality, you didn’t tell them NO! You reluctantly said ok, then did the best you could to have a decent time. Sometimes you may have even been able to enjoy the date.

Reluctantly I will vote for Romney, it is too late to do anything else constructive. I intend to make the best of the date and try to enjoy it for the good of the country.

Is it possible that I don’t like a lot of what Romney has done in the past? You betcha. Is it possible I don’t like a lot of what Obama has done in the past?

Romney may not be good but he is not Obama. Obama has been the worst president this country has ever seen, much worse than the next closest competitor. I would vote for Carter, either Clinton, any Kennedy any Roosevelt or whom every you can think of over Obama. Romney is not as bad as Carter, Clinton or any of the others.I will not be excited about Romney but you can bet I will vote for Anybody But Obama.

For a Republican to win the presidency Moderates have to vote for a conservative or conservatives have to vote for a moderate. No matter how much you don’t like it is a simple fact of life, there simply are not enough conservatives to win an election, we need moderates to vote with us or we have to vote, like this time, with them.


19 posted on 05/02/2012 9:22:22 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Wilard couldn't even beat out McCain last time around. How is the guy who couldn't beat McCain supposed to beat the guy who beat McCain?

Especially when he has done so much to completely jettison his conservative voting base? Pro-choice. Pro-gun control. Pro-government run health care...

BS. Wilard will get steamrolled.

People like you didn't learn the lesson of Ford, Bush 41, Dole, or McCain...

20 posted on 05/02/2012 9:30:32 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson