Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unsolved Mysteries: Why Were Conservatives So Enamored of Rick Santorum?
Forbes ^ | 04/12/2012 | John Tamny

Posted on 04/13/2012 10:18:18 AM PDT by Josh Painter

Rick Santorum dropped out of the race for the Republican presidential nomination on Tuesday. Almost to a column, editorial and news account, the analysis centered on Santorum’s somewhat successful capture of conservative voters.

And there lies the mystery. How could a man seemingly so opposite of conservative have entranced so many voters who label themselves just that?

The easy answer is that as someone who made his religion such a prominent part of his campaign strategy... religious types who tend toward conservatism perhaps felt they’d found their man.

[...]

Indeed, if we ignore for a moment how very anti-conservative it is for any candidate to coddle certain commercial sectors, the simple truth is that to the extent that manufacturing jobs were ever glorious (a big reach on its own considering the proud history of sons and daughters of factory workers moving away from manufacturing locales), the very investors whose capital creates those jobs feel it’s yesterday’s news. That investors no longer value factory work explains why they migrated to China, and why a rising China has begun to similarly shed those jobs. For Santorum to then say he’ll bring them back not only smacks of a controlling, central planning gene, but it also speaks to a candidate divorced from reality in the economic sense. If Santorum were to actually succeed in reducing the manufacturing tax rate to zero, this wouldn’t alter the all-important investor perception of work that is no longer valued from a labor-intensive point of view.

Happily Santorum’s candidacy is in the rear-view mirror. Not so happy, however, is what his candidacy said about the beliefs of conservatives. If Santorum was truly their guy, it seems a movement once animated by the sunny, economically advanced dynamism of Ronald Reagan has taken a giant, impoverishing leap backwards.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2016election; anticonservative; classwar; classwarfare; election2012; election2016; falseconservative; florida; fooledagain; georgezimmerman; gop; notmanager; notreagan; novision; pennsylvania; ricksantorum; rosewaterrickey; santorum; santorumtruthfile; slickrickie; socialconservatives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 04/13/2012 10:18:30 AM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Because he’s not Mitt Romney.


2 posted on 04/13/2012 10:19:18 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

ABO and ABR

and... they aren’t considering Newt.


3 posted on 04/13/2012 10:20:52 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Because he’s not Mitt Romney.

That's exactly why.

4 posted on 04/13/2012 10:21:34 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Believe me, not all of us were


5 posted on 04/13/2012 10:22:15 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Because he is about 3 times more conservative than Mitt Romney.


6 posted on 04/13/2012 10:23:01 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I never understood the appeal of Santorum. He is a big-government social conservative and he’s never managed or governed.


7 posted on 04/13/2012 10:25:18 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Anjd because Romney has never expressed any sympathy for all the workers in manufacturing who lost their jobs, because the policies that enabled him to get rich, also destroyed jobs.


8 posted on 04/13/2012 10:27:25 AM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
That's exactly why.

That and they'd already run through all the other "not Mitt Romneys."

9 posted on 04/13/2012 10:27:43 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
more conservative than Mitt Romney.

Mitt isn't even a republican but a big govt LIBERAL. So don't say more conservative than. He doesn't belong in the GOP race.

10 posted on 04/13/2012 10:29:18 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Because anyone who has well defined beliefs and views will attract the attention of others who have well defined beliefs and views over someone who doesn’t hold any convictions. Even if you don’t agree with them on everything.


11 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:11 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Because he’s not Mitt Romney.

Yep!

I could add another few reasons that I, personally, supported him:

1. He's not a phony (unlike Romney).
2. He is honestly pro-life, and lives his pro-life beliefs, much like Sarah Palin (and unlike Romney).
3. He stands by all his convictions, including the currently unpopular ones (unlike Romney).

A lot of people admired Santorum even though they didn't necessarily agree with all of his public policy positions or personal beliefs. Polls showed that even his position on contraception, which was wildly mis-reported, gained him respect from both men and women.

12 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:40 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

In brief, he spoke our language.

Perry was my number one, after that I switched to Newt. But many in my circle of friends loved Santorum, and it’s because what he says resonates with them. He resonated with me, too, but I preferred Newt, just barely.


13 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:48 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I wasn’t “so enamored of him”— ever. Given my ABO stance, however, I’d have voted for him.


14 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:48 AM PDT by Clara Lou (ABO! ABO! ABO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
Because many of us did not want to support the only other option to Mitt: A man who cheated on two wives before moving onto his third, endorsed Dede Scuzzyfavor, did global warming ads with Pelosi, and called those who wanted to enforce immigration laws on long time illegals "inhumane"...resulting in Jim Rob himself to post FUNG, and FUNG. Many on FR saw Newt as the only way top stop Mitt. Others saw Rick as the only way to stop Mitt. Mitt just sat back and laughed as the conservative vote was divided.
15 posted on 04/13/2012 10:31:25 AM PDT by icwhatudo (Tax codes and spending don't get 14 year olds pregnant and on welfare. Morality Matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Santorum wasn’t even close to ready for prime time.

After what he said about Zimmerman he has no business at any level of government.


16 posted on 04/13/2012 10:32:20 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

He duped his supporters but they allowed it because they never checked his record - seems they didn’t care.


17 posted on 04/13/2012 10:32:21 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Santorum was, is, and always will be a joke.

It was all about stopping Romney.


18 posted on 04/13/2012 10:32:30 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Perry was my first choice too, I still cant believe how bad he imploded, it’s unbelievable.


19 posted on 04/13/2012 10:34:14 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

>>the simple truth is that to the extent that manufacturing jobs were ever glorious (a big reach on its own

I’m sure the folks at Forbes cannot understand this, but factory jobs are not glorious and no ever said they were. However, they were a way for a high school graduate with a work ethic to make a good living for his family, possibly sending the children to college so they could migrate to the big city and look down their noses at factory workers.

I am so sick of elitist snobbery on both sides of the RepubliCrat parties who worked so hard this election destroying every conservative candidate (and some almost-rans and shoulda-rans) reducing us to the Newt-Santorum-Romney choice.


20 posted on 04/13/2012 10:34:48 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson