[Mikey_1962]

If memory serves, in 2007 the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA could regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act if it found that those gases posed a risk to human health which they did in 2009. But there has not been a court challange yet.

I'll bet this gets tossed.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The new Republican president will have a lot to do his first day in office.

At least he better have.

[Baynative]

This is not about clean air, folks. It’s about crushing family budgets.

[SpaceBar]

You couldn’t cripple this country more effecively if you turned things over to north korean central planners. Anybody who hasn’t concluded that we are fully infiltrated by traiters from top to bottom is flatlining on life support.

[rightwingextremist1776]

The time to abolish the EPA is loooooooooong overdue.

[LucianOfSamasota]

"Right now there are no limits to the amount of carbon pollution that future power plants will be able to put into our skies"

Where to start?

Does burning coal pollute the air? Yes.

Is the measure of that pollution carbon, per se? Probably not - unless the carbon itself is considered a pollutant. Never forget that we ( but not Obama?) are carbon based life forms.

I think the real message here is more like, "The Capitalist running dogs must be punished for using the resources which belong to the people." Where 'people' means the 'people' of the undeveloped world and the Marxist world (high degree of overlap - irony lost on Marxists).

[MrB]

The question needs to be asked -

WHY DOES CO2 NEED TO BE LIMITED?

of course, their answer is “[anthropogenic] global warming”,
which has been discredited and disproven.

[hal ogen]

Time to burn yet another “celebritory” truck tire tonight in celebration of the EPA’s idiocy.