Posted on 03/08/2012 8:03:47 AM PST by butterdezillion
A week ago today Sheriff Joe Arpaio held a press conference to report the preliminary findings of the Cold Case Posse. Mike Zullo, commander of the posse, reported that they had found probable cause for fraud and forgery of Obama's long-form birth certificate and draft registration, and that the posse was recommending a full criminal investigation. Sheriff Arpaio said the investigation would continue but that he would have to decide who, if anybody, to refer the case to for additional follow-up.
Those who perpetrated the forgeries and fraud defrauded the people of Maricopa County, Arizona. Arpaio has jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute that crime, but his ability to get warrants, require depositions, and issue inviolate subpoenas for official records is limited. And he would not have the ability to prosecute for FEDERAL crimes committed.
This means that Arpaio can only nicely ask the HDOH for the original records that will tell us what really happened. We know what Hawaii does with nice requests. The law doesn't REQUIRE one state to honor another state's subpoenas. The states generally work together on law enforcement, but Hawaii's government is in a class all its own. On the issue of FRAUD, the HDOH are implicated in the fraud itself, since they themselves acted as if what was online was genuine. So the State of Hawaii has its own potential criminality to cover up. They will not cooperate with Sheriff Joe or any investigation unless they can legally be FORCED to cooperate.
If we are going to have any semblance of the rule of law we need a federal investigation.
It can't be a DOJ investigation. As we've seen through Fast & Furious, the DOJ folks under AG Eric Holder are just as crooked as the criminals - perjuring themselves and refusing subpoenas regarding their own potential crimes of obstructing justice for Brian Terry, committing acts of war against Mexico by deliberately arming drug cartels with untrackable weapons, and other potential crimes.
We need Congress to initiate hearings and eventually appoint a special independent prosecutor to investigate and prosecute the federal crimes that the Cold Case Posse has uncovered, as well as many other crimes perpetrated to cover up Obama's documentation problem.
That is only going to happen if we literally BURY all our Congress-critters with DEMANDS for an investigation. Each of us should call our Senators, Representative, and the Oversight Committee - Darryl Issa's Office (ask specifically for Issa's office) at 202-225-5051.
The more people we can ping, e-mail, tweet, etc to get them to demand the simple rule of law - that known SERIOUS federal crimes be investigated and prosecuted - the more likely that our government will realize the people are awake and are not going to give up this country without a fight.
If we don't give them that message now, loudly and clearly, then we have no room to complain when even the appearance of the rule of law is abandoned for utter chaos. At this point the courts are so compromised they are a vain hope. (See http://www.coachisright.com/georgia-superior-court-refuses-to-consider-legal-appeal-of-obama-eligibility-ruling/ ) Crimes have been committed, and unless we are a banana republic, those crimes need to be investigated.
Here's a sample of what you might want to say:
After seeing the press conference that Sheriff Joe Arpaio held in Maricopa County -- it became obvious that a crime has been committed. Not only is the birth certificate fraudulently manufactured... but it was clear by Sheriff Joe's findings that the Selective Service card was fraudulently forged and manufactured. This is no longer about the minutia of the birth certificate any more. If the Selective Service card is a fraudulent produced document then by law -- it is illegal for Obama to hold ANY public office position... not even allowed to be Senator. There needs to be a congressional hearing held on this. When will that happen?
Please take a moment now to call your Senators and Representative (you can search for their phone number at http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt ), as well as the Oversight Committee at 202-225-5051 (remember to ask specifically for Issa). And then ping, e-mail, and tweet as many people as you can, asking them to do the same.
Thanks!
I’m not sure how to update the original post, but Mike Zullo has given a link for a better video of the presser:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWmWO18GTc8
Jemian, if I remember correctly you transcribed the audio of a radio spot where Mike Evans talked about his conversations with Neil Abercrombie, and how they couldn’t find a birth certificate for Obama. Did I remember that right? Do you have a transcription pedal for that purpose? Or maybe Sharon Rondeau at The Post & Email has transcribed the press conference?
If we could get this into a format where people could e-mail it to their e-mail lists so people could see exactly what the media is hiding from them it could be useful.
We are without a functioning media so we need to communicate to as many people as possible both the content of this presser AND how serious this really is.
Is there something that could be written up that would make it easier for everybody to communicate with local media, legislators, or friends/neighbors? What can I or anybody else do to help?
To communicate with the people who NEED to take this seriously and realize how serious we are if they try to poo-pooh this issue, I was thinking about the possibility of sending rolls of toilet paper with “The Rule of Law” written on the paper in marker and a note saying something like, “I thought you could use this since I can smell you all the way from Nebraska.” (or wherever you’re from) I don’t know. Does anybody have any thoughts about that?
My thought was that if we had somebody (a coordinator) close to Washington DC, Hawaii, Georgia, maybe Arizona... they could collect names of people who would like to send a roll, maybe each person could pitch in $1 for the work of putting it all together, and that coordinator for that area could arrange to have a name sticker placed on each roll of TP and then all of them could be delivered to the Congress-critters, judge, HDOH, etc who are wiping their bottoms on the rule of law - to inexpensively let them know we are watching and though non-violent we are dead serious about this.
For people who only listen to the MSM, maybe we need to get out on the sidewalks and have some rallies or protests to raise visibility. Maybe fliers. Some of you advertiser/sales types could probably brainstorm much better on this than I can.
This is all stuff the left does better than the right, but we have the choice to either roll over and die, or else fight with what means we still have, before we lose those too. It’s crunch time, right now.
As William Wallace said in “Braveheart”, you know what happens if we don’t do this: Nothing. We are down by a lot, late in the 4th quarter, and if we do nothing the time will run out and the future of this nation and our children will be lost. We can’t give up now. We’re rounding that last corner on the 400-meter run. We have to kick now, or we’ll leave the race with something left that we failed to give. We have to leave it all out on the field, because once we lose this race for the rule of law there won’t be another chance to give what we held back.
If the COLB was genuine then why would they need to forge a long-form?
And BTW, how did they get the “seal” on the fold at that specific angle to not distort? I’ve shown on my blog that there’s no way that result can be duplicated in real life. The same methodology the posse used to show that what’s on the long-form can’t be duplicated in real life.
I just listen, pause, type, listen, pause, type and so on until it is done.
I can try in the AM, but tonight I’m heading to bed.
Besok!
If a few million people start to e-mail this to their congressman, they might start to take notice.
TREASON
The betrayal of one’s own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies.
The Treason Clause traces its roots back to an English statute enacted during the reign of Edward III (1327–1377). This statute prohibited levying war against the king, adhering to his enemies, or contemplating his death. Although this law defined treason to include disloyal and subversive thoughts, it effectively circumscribed the crime as it existed under the Common Law. During the thirteenth century, the crime of treason encompassed virtually every act contrary to the king’s will and became a political tool of the Crown. Building on the tradition begun by Edward III, the Founding Fathers carefully delineated the crime of treason in Article III of the U.S. Constitution, narrowly defining its elements and setting forth stringent evidentiary requirements.
Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.
The Treason Clause applies only to disloyal acts committed during times of war. Acts of dis-loyalty during peacetime are not considered treasonous under the Constitution. Nor do acts of Espionage committed on behalf of an ally constitute treason. For example, julius and ethel rosenberg were convicted of espionage, in 1951, for helping the Soviet Union steal atomic secrets from the United States during World War II. The Rosenbergs were not tried for treason because the United States and the Soviet Union were allies during World War II.
Under Article III a person can levy war against the United States without the use of arms, weapons, or military equipment. Persons who play only a peripheral role in a conspiracy to levy war are still considered traitors under the Constitution if an armed rebellion against the United States results. After the U.S. Civil War, for example, all Confederate soldiers were vulnerable to charges of treason, regardless of their role in the secession or insurrection of the Southern states. No treason charges were filed against these soldiers, however, because President Andrew Johnson issued a universal Amnesty.
The crime of treason requires a traitorous intent. If a person unwittingly or unintentionally gives aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States during wartime, treason has not occurred. Similarly, a person who pursues a course of action that is intended to benefit the United States but mistakenly helps an enemy is not guilty of treason. Inadvertent disloyalty is never punishable as treason, no matter how much damage the United States suffers.
As in any other criminal trial in the United States, a defendant charged with treason is presumed innocent until proved guilty Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Treason may be proved by a voluntary confession in open court or by evidence that the defendant committed an Overt Act of treason. Each overt act must be witnessed by at least two people, or a conviction for treason will not stand. By requiring this type of direct evidence, the Constitution minimizes the danger of convicting an innocent person and forestalls the possibility of partisan witch-hunts waged by a single adversary.
Unexpressed seditious thoughts do not constitute treason, even if those thoughts contemplate a bloody revolution or coup. Nor does the public expression of subversive opinions, including vehement criticism of the government and its policies, constitute treason. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right of all Americans to advocate the violent overthrow of their government unless such advocacy is directed toward inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce it (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 89 S. Ct. 1827, 23 L. Ed. 2d 430 [1969]). On the other hand, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the distribution of leaflets protesting the draft during World War I was not constitutionally protected speech (schenck v. united states, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 [1919]).
Because treason involves the betrayal of allegiance to the United States, a person need not be a U.S. citizen to commit treason under the Constitution. Persons who owe temporary allegiance to the United States can commit treason. Aliens who are domiciliaries of the United States, for example, can commit traitorous acts during the period of their domicile. A subversive act does not need to occur on U.S. soil to be punishable as treason. For example, Mildred Gillars, a U.S. citizen who became known as Axis Sally, was convicted of treason for broadcasting demoralizing propaganda to Allied forces in Europe from a Nazi radio station in Germany during World War II.
Treason is punishable by death. If a death sentence is not imposed, defendants face a minimum penalty of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine (18 U.S.C.A. § 2381). A person who is convicted of treason may not hold federal office at any time thereafter.
The English common law required defendants to forfeit all of their property, real and personal, upon conviction for treason. In some cases, the British Crown confiscated the property of immediate family members as well. The common law also precluded convicted traitors from bequeathing their property through a will. Relatives were presumed to be tainted by the blood of the traitor and were not permitted to inherit from him. Article III of the U.S. Constitution outlaws such “corruption of the blood” and limits the penalty of Forfeiture to “the life of the person attainted.” Under this provision relatives cannot be made to forfeit their property or inheritance for crimes committed by traitorous family members.
Tea Party Tribune made this video....cleaned it up, enhanced the sound.....I was there...in this room
wish you would make a stand alone post of just the MSCO video....
i would but have no skills
Brilliant Butter! Will do!!!
” - - - We are without a functioning media - - - “
This is the central obstacle to communicating beyond ourselves. Once we accept that as fact we can adjust and succeed. To not accept it is to imprison ourselves by walls of our own making.
If our goal is to make a lot of the public know, then we can count on only 20 % support from them. So if 15 % of the population actually believes the evidence, then 15 % X 20 % = 3 % support at the most.
If our goal is to have the election officials, Legal Courts, etc. examine the evidence then 1.) Obama could be declared ineligible, and 2.) The MSM would probably mention it if Obama was “grandfathered in.”
I favor the latter goal of a legal filing with the proper authorities. Allan Keyes would be a good source on the correct procedure. I am not a lawyer, but the filing of a complaint by a FRiendly Lawyer to the election and Legal authorities would be the most expedient way to achieve the latter goal.
The most compelling evidence is from the hotlink that had the computer expert de-layer the certificate showing the steps required to produce the forged certificate.
With a good Lawyer, a good computer technician, and credible leaders, the chance of achieving our goal will be greatly increased.
Joel Pollak, Editor for Andrew Beitbart’s programs and Michelle Malkin would be 2 of many good sources to approach.
Forget about the MSM, as they will dismiss, marginalize, and otherwise reject ALL of our attempts.
We must depend on ourselves to capture the imagination of credible Conservative spokesmen and women, ( don’t approach Ann Coulter, or Bill O’Reilley), who will then file legal instruments with the election and legal officials, such as all 50 of the State’s Attorney Generals.
BTW, holding a Press Conference after each legal filing, and placing each on the Internet could also achieve the first goal of letting a lot of the public know about the fact that former foreign student Obama from Haavuuud Law School has fallen “victim” to being in the possession of forged Federal Documents, with National Security ramifications. Who could have forged those documents???????????????
What say all of you?
The trouble is that people like Michelle Malkin have been threatened. They are not going to help us. The actually independent voices were primarily Rush and Breitbart - the 2 people who were either killed or received the equivalent of a horse’s head in their bed on the same day as the presser. The Breitbart people will push what they think they can but I’d bet money they know why Breitbart is dead and they’re not willing to be dead alongside him; better to live to fight another day.
The other person who might be independent and might help us out is Jeff Kuhner.
I have no proof of it, but looking at what happened in Georgia, I’d say it’s a good bet that the election officials will be threatened also, if they haven’t already been. Seems like there was foul play when the GA eligibility bill was being considered as well. And while I was working in trying to get Nebraska’s eligibility bill passed there were reports I received which suggested there was no chance of anything ever happening even if it got out of committee, which it was never going to do. I don’t know what the hold was there but it was solid - like whatever it was that got the D and R Congress-critters to fall on their swords for Obama’s radical agenda.
I think the only chance we have is actually with the people - the hobbits who haven’t been corrupted by power and who stand to be made slaves in the new lawless society.
Shoot. I wish I had my transcription pedal from when I was transcribing.
I wonder if Sharon Rondeau has transcribed any of this.
I don’t know how to do it either, but surely somebody at FR knows how to do it. You mean a post that embeds the video, to start a thread, or what exactly?
I’ll have it done in the a.m. a stand alone thread with access to the video and a couple more short ones a comin.
That would be a question for someone who actually believes the long-form is forged to answer.
And BTW, how did they get the “seal” on the fold at that specific angle to not distort? I’ve shown on my blog that there’s no way that result can be duplicated in real life. The same methodology the posse used to show that what’s on the long-form can’t be duplicated in real life.
I think I found the experiment you're talking about.
You're photographing your copy at the wrong angle. Where you went wrong was thinking that matching the left edge was all it took to get the angle right. That should be immediately apparent when looking at the lines on the right edge.
Perhaps a well placed question to one, or all, of our four Republican Candidates? With FReeper audio and cameras rolling. Do NOT rely on the MSM.
Maybe multiple emails of key videos to their staff headquarters?
Probably the best would be to compile a de-layering video tutorial on how to spot forgeries, using Obama’s forged birth certificate as an excellent example, and present it in a manner that would cause the video to go VIRAL.
Maybe translate one video into British, another into Thai, and a third into Kenyan.
BTW, maybe one of Obama’s fellow foreign students from Haaahvuuud might know who the dirty, low-down, scoundrel was that forged the birth certificate of a future White House Occupier!
You guys need to get those crazy Ron Paulites on your side. Then it would spread.
ping - I’m late to the thread but don’t miss it....
THX THX
Thanks for the ping.
Here is another avenue we should think of using on a local level:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.