I’m not sure how to update the original post, but Mike Zullo has given a link for a better video of the presser:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWmWO18GTc8
Jemian, if I remember correctly you transcribed the audio of a radio spot where Mike Evans talked about his conversations with Neil Abercrombie, and how they couldn’t find a birth certificate for Obama. Did I remember that right? Do you have a transcription pedal for that purpose? Or maybe Sharon Rondeau at The Post & Email has transcribed the press conference?
If we could get this into a format where people could e-mail it to their e-mail lists so people could see exactly what the media is hiding from them it could be useful.
We are without a functioning media so we need to communicate to as many people as possible both the content of this presser AND how serious this really is.
Is there something that could be written up that would make it easier for everybody to communicate with local media, legislators, or friends/neighbors? What can I or anybody else do to help?
To communicate with the people who NEED to take this seriously and realize how serious we are if they try to poo-pooh this issue, I was thinking about the possibility of sending rolls of toilet paper with “The Rule of Law” written on the paper in marker and a note saying something like, “I thought you could use this since I can smell you all the way from Nebraska.” (or wherever you’re from) I don’t know. Does anybody have any thoughts about that?
My thought was that if we had somebody (a coordinator) close to Washington DC, Hawaii, Georgia, maybe Arizona... they could collect names of people who would like to send a roll, maybe each person could pitch in $1 for the work of putting it all together, and that coordinator for that area could arrange to have a name sticker placed on each roll of TP and then all of them could be delivered to the Congress-critters, judge, HDOH, etc who are wiping their bottoms on the rule of law - to inexpensively let them know we are watching and though non-violent we are dead serious about this.
For people who only listen to the MSM, maybe we need to get out on the sidewalks and have some rallies or protests to raise visibility. Maybe fliers. Some of you advertiser/sales types could probably brainstorm much better on this than I can.
This is all stuff the left does better than the right, but we have the choice to either roll over and die, or else fight with what means we still have, before we lose those too. It’s crunch time, right now.
As William Wallace said in “Braveheart”, you know what happens if we don’t do this: Nothing. We are down by a lot, late in the 4th quarter, and if we do nothing the time will run out and the future of this nation and our children will be lost. We can’t give up now. We’re rounding that last corner on the 400-meter run. We have to kick now, or we’ll leave the race with something left that we failed to give. We have to leave it all out on the field, because once we lose this race for the rule of law there won’t be another chance to give what we held back.
I just listen, pause, type, listen, pause, type and so on until it is done.
I can try in the AM, but tonight I’m heading to bed.
Besok!
If a few million people start to e-mail this to their congressman, they might start to take notice.
TREASON
The betrayal of one’s own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies.
The Treason Clause traces its roots back to an English statute enacted during the reign of Edward III (1327–1377). This statute prohibited levying war against the king, adhering to his enemies, or contemplating his death. Although this law defined treason to include disloyal and subversive thoughts, it effectively circumscribed the crime as it existed under the Common Law. During the thirteenth century, the crime of treason encompassed virtually every act contrary to the king’s will and became a political tool of the Crown. Building on the tradition begun by Edward III, the Founding Fathers carefully delineated the crime of treason in Article III of the U.S. Constitution, narrowly defining its elements and setting forth stringent evidentiary requirements.
Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.
The Treason Clause applies only to disloyal acts committed during times of war. Acts of dis-loyalty during peacetime are not considered treasonous under the Constitution. Nor do acts of Espionage committed on behalf of an ally constitute treason. For example, julius and ethel rosenberg were convicted of espionage, in 1951, for helping the Soviet Union steal atomic secrets from the United States during World War II. The Rosenbergs were not tried for treason because the United States and the Soviet Union were allies during World War II.
Under Article III a person can levy war against the United States without the use of arms, weapons, or military equipment. Persons who play only a peripheral role in a conspiracy to levy war are still considered traitors under the Constitution if an armed rebellion against the United States results. After the U.S. Civil War, for example, all Confederate soldiers were vulnerable to charges of treason, regardless of their role in the secession or insurrection of the Southern states. No treason charges were filed against these soldiers, however, because President Andrew Johnson issued a universal Amnesty.
The crime of treason requires a traitorous intent. If a person unwittingly or unintentionally gives aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States during wartime, treason has not occurred. Similarly, a person who pursues a course of action that is intended to benefit the United States but mistakenly helps an enemy is not guilty of treason. Inadvertent disloyalty is never punishable as treason, no matter how much damage the United States suffers.
As in any other criminal trial in the United States, a defendant charged with treason is presumed innocent until proved guilty Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Treason may be proved by a voluntary confession in open court or by evidence that the defendant committed an Overt Act of treason. Each overt act must be witnessed by at least two people, or a conviction for treason will not stand. By requiring this type of direct evidence, the Constitution minimizes the danger of convicting an innocent person and forestalls the possibility of partisan witch-hunts waged by a single adversary.
Unexpressed seditious thoughts do not constitute treason, even if those thoughts contemplate a bloody revolution or coup. Nor does the public expression of subversive opinions, including vehement criticism of the government and its policies, constitute treason. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right of all Americans to advocate the violent overthrow of their government unless such advocacy is directed toward inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce it (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 89 S. Ct. 1827, 23 L. Ed. 2d 430 [1969]). On the other hand, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the distribution of leaflets protesting the draft during World War I was not constitutionally protected speech (schenck v. united states, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 [1919]).
Because treason involves the betrayal of allegiance to the United States, a person need not be a U.S. citizen to commit treason under the Constitution. Persons who owe temporary allegiance to the United States can commit treason. Aliens who are domiciliaries of the United States, for example, can commit traitorous acts during the period of their domicile. A subversive act does not need to occur on U.S. soil to be punishable as treason. For example, Mildred Gillars, a U.S. citizen who became known as Axis Sally, was convicted of treason for broadcasting demoralizing propaganda to Allied forces in Europe from a Nazi radio station in Germany during World War II.
Treason is punishable by death. If a death sentence is not imposed, defendants face a minimum penalty of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine (18 U.S.C.A. § 2381). A person who is convicted of treason may not hold federal office at any time thereafter.
The English common law required defendants to forfeit all of their property, real and personal, upon conviction for treason. In some cases, the British Crown confiscated the property of immediate family members as well. The common law also precluded convicted traitors from bequeathing their property through a will. Relatives were presumed to be tainted by the blood of the traitor and were not permitted to inherit from him. Article III of the U.S. Constitution outlaws such “corruption of the blood” and limits the penalty of Forfeiture to “the life of the person attainted.” Under this provision relatives cannot be made to forfeit their property or inheritance for crimes committed by traitorous family members.
Tea Party Tribune made this video....cleaned it up, enhanced the sound.....I was there...in this room
wish you would make a stand alone post of just the MSCO video....
i would but have no skills
” - - - We are without a functioning media - - - “
This is the central obstacle to communicating beyond ourselves. Once we accept that as fact we can adjust and succeed. To not accept it is to imprison ourselves by walls of our own making.
If our goal is to make a lot of the public know, then we can count on only 20 % support from them. So if 15 % of the population actually believes the evidence, then 15 % X 20 % = 3 % support at the most.
If our goal is to have the election officials, Legal Courts, etc. examine the evidence then 1.) Obama could be declared ineligible, and 2.) The MSM would probably mention it if Obama was “grandfathered in.”
I favor the latter goal of a legal filing with the proper authorities. Allan Keyes would be a good source on the correct procedure. I am not a lawyer, but the filing of a complaint by a FRiendly Lawyer to the election and Legal authorities would be the most expedient way to achieve the latter goal.
The most compelling evidence is from the hotlink that had the computer expert de-layer the certificate showing the steps required to produce the forged certificate.
With a good Lawyer, a good computer technician, and credible leaders, the chance of achieving our goal will be greatly increased.
Joel Pollak, Editor for Andrew Beitbart’s programs and Michelle Malkin would be 2 of many good sources to approach.
Forget about the MSM, as they will dismiss, marginalize, and otherwise reject ALL of our attempts.
We must depend on ourselves to capture the imagination of credible Conservative spokesmen and women, ( don’t approach Ann Coulter, or Bill O’Reilley), who will then file legal instruments with the election and legal officials, such as all 50 of the State’s Attorney Generals.
BTW, holding a Press Conference after each legal filing, and placing each on the Internet could also achieve the first goal of letting a lot of the public know about the fact that former foreign student Obama from Haavuuud Law School has fallen “victim” to being in the possession of forged Federal Documents, with National Security ramifications. Who could have forged those documents???????????????
What say all of you?
Here’s something that makes total sense and needs to go viral. I posted this on fb and to people in my address book as well!!!...To all my fb sisters and brothers,...you need to help us getting this video going viral to save our nation. Please send it to ALL in your addressbook, it’s imperative folks!!!If you are a true Patriot, please do...>>>...
bumping to keep this story relevent over opportunistic manufactured outrage headlines meant to distract
keep up the good work, butterdezillion, meanwhile, I’m doing what I do best - - being a HUGE pest to my elected officials over the matter of, oh-my-goodness-how-could-it-happen-we have forged selective service cards and multiple social security accounts by unknown individuals and or imposters claiming our own president’s identity, for cripes sakes, how can that be!?! Someone HAS to look into this!! (big grin)