Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum Wants to Fight ‘The Dangers Of Contraception’
Time ^ | 02/14/2012 | By Michael Scherer

Posted on 02/16/2012 1:23:19 PM PST by Responsibility2nd

Candidates often say things when polling in the single digits that come back to haunt them when they start leading the polls. Last October, Rick Santorum gave an interview with an Evangelical blog called Caffeinated Thoughts, in which he said contraception is “not okay,” and that this would be a public policy issue he would tackle as President. In particular, he said he would “get rid of any idea that you have to have abortion coverage or contraceptive coverage” as a government policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at swampland.time.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biggovernmentrick; catholic; contraception; healthcare; idiot; obamacare; paultardfest; purist; puritan; ricksantorum; statist; statistrick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Obammie started this debate on contraception. He started this fight with the Catholic Church. I hope this sinks him.

You're darned right he started this fight with the Catholic Church. But he did it as part of a strategy to scare his base into stampeding to the polls. He wasn't ever going to win a majority of devoted Catholics - instead, his target is urban/suburban agnostics and loosely-affiliated Catholics and Protestants who don't want to hear about social issues because they make them uncomfortable. Guilt sucks, man.

I know that's a terribly sad thing to say about the state of our country because moral issues really do matter. A lot. But that's where we are. I hope people wake up to the fact that they are being manipulated and lied to in the service of encouraging terrible behavior (some might say... sin), as if our government was the final arbiter of decency and morality in human affairs.

41 posted on 02/16/2012 2:10:37 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I don’t think any President is going to be a threat to rubbers being sold at the neighborhood gas station counter. People are gullible and stupid.


42 posted on 02/16/2012 2:11:15 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

There are ways that the government can influence people’s views on a topic without either banning or subsidizing any particular choice.

They do it all the time - they call them “PSA’s”.

Smoking is a good example. Is smoking banned by the federal government? Nope. To the contrary. But they sure do spend a lot of time and money on advertising to reduce the usage of the product.


43 posted on 02/16/2012 2:11:35 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; All
"One of the things I will talk about that no President has talked about before is I think the dangers of contraception in this country." ------ Which is precisely why if Rick Santorum is the nominee we'd lose in a massive, crushing landslide. Hearing Rick bleat on about the evils of contraception (and gambling, etc) would be a guaranteed loser of an issue.

Well said. Holy mackerel, and Romney, Paul, and Santorum just turned down participating in the CNN debate for Georgia, a pretty chicken-sh*t way to deprive Republicans hearing from the horses' mouths their takes on issues, and MAINLY to avoid facing Newt and to avoid the OBVIOUS quesitons that these latest declarations from Santorum would bring up. I know, I know, folks will say, "Well, yeah, but they're just telling CNN to stick it." You Santorum supporters, do you seriously think that if it was any other place than Georgia, where Newt is heavily favored, Santorum and Romney would have done the same? That's the caliber of character those wankers have.

Hey, Santorum supporters -- are you at least beginning to see the handwriting on the wall??????? Wake up.

GODSPEED NEWT GINGRICH.

44 posted on 02/16/2012 2:16:08 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
Women aren’t going to vote for someone with these personal beliefs. He should have kept them to himself or not run for President. Rick’s aversion to birth control even for married women and his skepticism of women working, calling it a “feminist trap”, means he has NO chance of being elected.

I work with mostly 22-35 year old women who are either middle of the road or basically conservative. None are outright liberal and they are now convinced through the ms media the Republican party is going to take away their birth control and they are running to the Democrat platform. Democrats are masters of doing this crap.

45 posted on 02/16/2012 2:17:02 PM PST by trailhkr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

We call it wakin the bacon in these here parts.


46 posted on 02/16/2012 2:17:39 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MrB

It certainly isn’t the end of the argument.

Does he not want to regulate curtail or legislate it because he knows it is not a winning issue - or because fundamentally he doesn’t recognize the power of government to regulate such things?

Him calling it a “public policy issue” indicates he thinks it IS something under the aegis of government control.


47 posted on 02/16/2012 2:21:09 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Santorum has said he wants, as president, to give each state the right to ban contraceptives if they see fit.


48 posted on 02/16/2012 2:32:39 PM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/santorum-explains-06-loss-still-supports-state-right-to-outlaw-contraception/

One issue was Santorum’s opposition to the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling that invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception. Santorum said he still feels that a state should be able to make such laws.

“The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that. It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to pass whatever statues they have. That is the thing I have said about the activism of the Supreme Court, they are creating rights, and they should be left up to the people to decide,” he said.

“You shouldn’t create constitutional rights when states do dumb things,” Santorum said. “Let the people decide if the states are doing dumb things get rid of the legislature and replace them as opposed to creating constitutional laws that have consequences that were before them.”

49 posted on 02/16/2012 2:41:24 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

I am going to have to double check but you may have just won the internet.


50 posted on 02/16/2012 2:41:43 PM PST by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

“Stick in the mud”
“Don’t force your morals on me”

sigh...

How about “keep your rosaries off my ovaries” while we’re at it?

Tough to be a conservative anymore...even at Free Republic.

Should he also drop opposition to abortion? Opposition to homosexual marriage? Lets all just support Romney and have a big ole gay party with Breitbart and GOProud. Woohooo! Got to go with the polls! Lets watch Rianna have an alterboy pray at her ass as we let our kids watch GLEE!!! Just make sure taxes are low!

/s


51 posted on 02/16/2012 2:42:35 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Dick Morris saw this coming. Wow! Did he nail it.


52 posted on 02/16/2012 2:47:37 PM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The country is 16 trillion dollars in debt and you are consumed by whether are not your neighbor uses a rubber.


53 posted on 02/16/2012 2:47:59 PM PST by org.whodat (Sorry bill, I should never have made all those jokes about you and Lewinsky, have fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Amen


54 posted on 02/16/2012 2:50:30 PM PST by GreatMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I strongly disagree that a state has any right to have any say about contraception for a myriad of reasons. And the majority of citizens will agree with me and this will be the end of Santorum’s campaign if he does not abandon it. It is a no win situation for him. Where are his advisors?


55 posted on 02/16/2012 2:53:32 PM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Michael Scherer? Figures. He's just another leftist who makes stuff up

He used to write for Mother Jones. That's all that needs to be said.

56 posted on 02/16/2012 2:56:46 PM PST by Darren McCarty (Rick Santorum in the primary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun
Yes, either the citizen is sovereign - or the State is sovereign.

Santorum talks of the government inventing rights, when obviously they have no such power to do so, and they did no such thing.

They recognized our natural right that has always existed, and at the expense of the government power to enforce compliance, in one of the most personal and private domains of human interaction.

He doesn't not want to outlaw or regulate contraception because he doesn't believe in Government power to do such things - he DOES want it to be outlawed at the STATE level.

Electoral considerations aside - his fundamental philosophy on the natural rights of man and individual liberty are anathema to me - and should be to any conservative who believes in a government of limited and enumerated powers and the sovereignty of the citizen.

57 posted on 02/16/2012 3:02:05 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Amen.


58 posted on 02/16/2012 3:05:26 PM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

You said that so much better than I ever could have.


59 posted on 02/16/2012 3:06:57 PM PST by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun

Thanks!


60 posted on 02/16/2012 3:08:16 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson