. . . . Compare two signatures at # 260.
.
Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven
[snip]...Jablonski remained true to his word -- neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing. I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind. According to reports in the blogosphere, the president's schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.
Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the "crazy birthers" would really do something...well, crazy. Or unlawful. In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.
The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing -- one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term. And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news -- that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.
Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
(c) is ambiguous. It is not whether the de novo appeal right is for cases other than tax cases or for tax cases. Further, (c) does not appear to be where the de novo appeal right comes from.
Like everybody else, you need to recognize that there is a reason competent lawyers get paid what they get paid. If you had one in this case, you would likely get a result you would like much better than the result you have now.
“Like everybody else, you need to recognize that there is a reason competent lawyers get paid what they get paid. If you had one in this case, you would likely get a result you would like much better than the result you have now.”
I’m please with the result. I posted the case would be de novo on appeal before the result was announced.
If Orly appeals, Obama will have to respond to summons to appear in GA Superior Court and testify under oath. It’s a civil suit. If the truth about Obama’s ineligibility is incriminating, then he’ll have to testify to it under oath. Even better, Nancy Pelosi filed a sworn statement Obama was eligible in Georgia in 2008. She is eligible for a deposition, a subpoena and production of records.
Who is the stalwart gentleman in the blue jacket?
I say again, if someone is a citizen only because of a law passed by Congress, they must be considered naturalized, for that is the only power Congress has, to define a rule for naturalization. Nothing about the rule need say they must file papers or take tests. It can just be by the "rule", and whatever criteria the rule sets. But that's not natural born.
I'm still waiting for the citation to what section of the Constitution delegates power to the Congress to define natural born.
Even the 1790 law which confered citizenship on the children of citizens born outside the jurisdiction of the US only said they "shall be considered as natural born Citizens", not that they shall be natural born citizens.
I say again, if someone is a citizen only because of a law passed by Congress, they must be considered naturalized, for that is the only power Congress has, to define a rule for naturalization. Nothing about the rule need say they must file papers or take tests. It can just be by the "rule", and whatever criteria the rule sets. But that's not natural born.
I'm still waiting for the citation to what section of the Constitution delegates power to the Congress to define natural born.
Even the 1790 law which conferred citizenship on the children of citizens born outside the jurisdiction of the US only said they "shall be considered as natural born Citizens", not that they shall be natural born citizens.
But it sure seems to get your knickers in a knot when I ask it. Perhaps trying obfuscate the fact that you aren't answering the question?
The Constitution clearly gives Congress power over the Jurisdiction of the Courts.
The Constitution clearly gives Congress the power over Naturalization.
The Constitution is not specifically clear over the meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”.
Where s pecific guidance is lacking, Congress can and does interpret Constitutional Language. In fact, Congress can even reign in the Courts if Congress truly disagrees with any Court ruling, even those made on a Constitutional question.
Saying that “Natural Born Citizen” has always meant a Citizen at the moment of birth means you do not have to change the Constitution at all.
The rules for Citizenship are set by Congress, and those rules changed, but you still must comply with the rules in effect at the time of your birth to qualify.
And? Congress could not make rules regarding “Naturalization” until Congress understood, clearly, who was already a birthright citizen. Thus Congress indeed have the power to define citizenship.
. . . . Compare two signatures at # 260.
.
No chance those signatures were made by the same person.
that so called social security ‘card’ is as much of a joke as was the birth certificate signed by ‘Dudley Dooright’ - remember that?
Right. Just thought people would like to see those signatures.
Btw, bushpilot1 was zotted.
The “D” in Dunham in the faux BC is made by a downward stroke to form the left side of the “D”, then a curl back through the downward stroke and sweeping right to make the bulge of the right side of the “D”. A completely different hand made the “D” on he supposed SS card. Perhaps Toots signed the one with the shaky hand? I suspect Toots was well involved in getting SS#s and HI issued fraudulent BCs for folks, for a fee of course.
There’s a program on my computer under accessories, called PAINT. With a very steady hand, the best you can do is use ‘brush’ and try to write the name...and that’s how it looks, after many practice tries.
-------------------- IT ISN'T THE ONE ON THE PHONY SOCIAL SECURITY CARD.(That one looks like it was 'painted' on by a 'mouse' using a program such as PAINT.
The signature on the card looks too stiff and pixelated to have been done by a child. It appears to have been done by a machine.
Come to think of it, it looks almost exactly as if the “pen” tool in the Microsoft Windows “Paint” application was used to draw that not-so-smooth line. With the user’s non-dominant hand, yet.
I don’t recall why the SS card was made visible, why it was even put online.
THEY ARE JOKES!
In summary, Barry Dunham is an enemy of the Republic and has committed acts of High treason. Sadly, because the rule of law is no longer validating the Constitution, the treasonous, treacherous vermin and his henchghouls working as servants to a hidden agenda and hidden forces will get away with the aborting of this Republic. we The People are on our last gasp and a man like Mitt Romney will only serve to reign under the irreversible decline already swooshing US down the slippery slope of Marxist federal oligarchy.
And before someone demands proof of any of the charges above, consider them 'my opinions' ... there is absolutely nothing, no document, no testimony, and not even an admission by the scum now acting as pres__ent which will be allowed to remove this affirmative action lying fraud homosexual from his position sevring the transformers of the Republic. Would there be race riots in the largest cities if little barry numbnuts was removed for his High Treason? NO, but that threat has every duly elected legislator cowering from abiding by their oath to the Constitution.
And therein is the ultimate treachery, because these scum swore to uphold and defend the document since it is the contract between them and We The People. They have violated the contract, irrevocably. Period.
Back to the thread for fourteen SAD and SAD0 signatures.
. . . . See # 675.
Thanks, Fred Nerks. [How many are fake?]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.