Posted on 01/30/2012 8:25:22 PM PST by devattel
An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.
But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.
The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“Because the individual states decide who is on the ballot in their respective states.This info in Georgia has been sent to the Georgia Secretary of State.Lets see what happens.”
.... now it depends on how much they offer him
“Wasn’t their slogan, “No Job Too Hard”?”
Perhaps it was “We’ll ‘raise your seal. . .’” ;)
"Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States" and counting. . .
We will see.
Breitbart talks a good game but he is too coward to address the obama elig issue, for he wants to be on Fox news.
He’ll wave it in the air and put a doctored copy on the internet but he won’t produce it up close and personal.
ping for later
So in theory, the Judge can enter a default judgment saying Obama is on the ballot because he provided me with a valid birth certificate.
Which basically kills the whole thing.
Other alternatives possible as well.
We will soon know.
If the TSA can detain a congressman, a Court can subpoena a sitting Pres__ent. If the state of VA can keep Newt off the ballot for not having enough signatures, the state of GA can keep Obambi off the ballot for not proving eligibility.
No, Obama didn’t present anything, he was a no show. So the ONLY evidence is what the three plaintiffs presented. That is all the judge can consider.
The judge has already indicated his decision will be on Feb 1st.
thank you for posting that
I am not so sure that the Judge can’t consider the BC that was sent to him. Like you said, this is an administrative court.
Of course, what weight does a copy have in the proceedings. Does it have to be the original certified copy.
But we will see tomorrow.
They can “thumb their nose” all they want,
but if the SoS doesn’t put his name on the ballot,
people have to write it in to vote for him,
and considering the diligence level of his “base”,
they aren’t going to bother.
No birth certificate, no matter how cleverly forged, changes the fact that his father was never a citizen of the United States.
they can write in his name until they have cramps, name won’t be considered
That’s true, the SoS is the one that has to certify the ballots and the vote counts,
and if he’s not eligible to be on the ballot, he’s not eligible to win.
A vote for 0bama is the same as a vote for Donald Duck in this situation.
Well, yes, unless the birth certificate says that, in fact, his father WAS a citizen of the U.S.
Depends entirely on who his father actually was.
List only those facts that you know about Barry0 — provable facts, not speculation and not the “official” bio or book.
You can do it on a Post-It note.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.