Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. District Court in Virginia Expedites Rick Perry’s Ballot Access Lawsuit
Ballot Access News ^ | 12-29-2011 | Richard Winger

Posted on 12/29/2011 11:59:17 AM PST by smoothsailing

U.S. District Court in Virginia Expedites Rick Perry’s Ballot Access Lawsuit

Richard Winger

December 29th, 2011

U.S. District Court Judge John A. Gibney of Virginia has set a hearing in Rick Perry’s presidential primary ballot access lawsuit. He will consider Perry’s request for injunctive relief on January 13. In the meantime, he has established a briefing schedule, and also has instructed attorneys for Perry to communicate with all other Republican presidential primary candidates who had filed a declaration of candidacy, to explain to them how they may intervene in the lawsuit. This shows foresight and thoughtfulness on the part of the judge. The case is Perry v Judd, 3:11-cv-856. Judge Gibney is an Obama appointee. The issue is the state’s ban on out-of-state circulators.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; perry; perry2012; rickperry; ruling; statesrights; va2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: ZULU
Good. I hope the rule changes

Yep, that would be great, a Federal Court telling a state political party what there rules have to be.

I never thought I'd see support for something like this on a "conservative" site.

21 posted on 12/29/2011 12:40:18 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA; smoothsailing

The ‘toads’ changed the rules recently and all candidates’ signatures were not verified. Apparently Romney & Paul’s were not checked.....different set of standards depending on how many were submitted.

Also only registered VA residents were allowed to collect signatures.

I hope all the details eventually come out....I think Perry has a strong case and the VA voters should thank him for making sure they have more than two choices in their Primary.

Any idea why Santorum & Bachmann did not try to submit signatures?


22 posted on 12/29/2011 12:41:26 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (*OMG ...means Obama Must Go in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I thought that Rick Perry was OPPOSED to the federal courts interfering in a state’s elections process.

Well, if it pisses you off, it's certainly worthwhile! :)

23 posted on 12/29/2011 12:43:12 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I thought that Rick Perry was OPPOSED to the federal courts interfering in a state’s elections process.

That was back when he had pretenses of being a conservative. No conservative would ever want a Federal judge interfering with the internal rules of a state political party. That's DU type stuff.

24 posted on 12/29/2011 12:44:51 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

He’s not challenging the VAGOP, he’s challenging VA state law.


25 posted on 12/29/2011 12:45:11 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: formosa
The establishment is getting foolish.

That often happens when you pledge allegiance to a Myth..

26 posted on 12/29/2011 12:45:57 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Virginia GOP: Romney's favorite butt boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; jonrick46; deepbluesea; TexMom7; potlatch; SunkenCiv; wolfcreek; BuckeyeTexan; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************************


27 posted on 12/29/2011 12:45:57 PM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Right, the judge acknowledged a second printing may be required....

“Gibney said that if Perry prevails in the case, state election officials may have to print the ballots a second time. The judge set a deadline of Jan. 6 for the other Republican presidential candidates to intervene in the case.”


28 posted on 12/29/2011 12:49:16 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21

“Rep. Ron Paul submitted just under 15,000, and was submitted to signature-by-signature scrutiny on the same basis as the other candidates who submitted fewer than 15,000 signatures. After more than 7 hours of work, RPV determined that Rep. Paul had cleared the statutory 10,000/400 signature standard...”
http://www.rpv.org/node/1037


29 posted on 12/29/2011 12:49:31 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
The law has to be followed until it’s changed or overturned.

So, I guess in the 1800's you'd be all for arresting people involved with the Underground Railroad?

30 posted on 12/29/2011 12:50:07 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Virginia GOP: Romney's favorite butt boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

The reason the federal courts accepted this as a federal case is that it affects the country nationwide. If this had just been a state problem for Virginia to deal with, then the state could have dealt with it in and of itself, but when something a state does involves the entire country or at least affects the entire country, it then is considered a federal issue, not a simple state issue.


31 posted on 12/29/2011 12:52:40 PM PST by casinva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Ouch!
That’s a significant decision that should have been in the article.


32 posted on 12/29/2011 12:53:58 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Well, OK, so hopefully they can do an end-run around the GOP and get on the ballot.

But wait - there's more. VA is an "open" primary. The Democrats can vote to eliminate the best conservatives.

One fist of iron, the other of steel
If the right one don't a-get you
Then the left one will

Sixteen Tons - Tennessee Ernie Ford.

33 posted on 12/29/2011 12:55:28 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

Bump.


34 posted on 12/29/2011 12:57:10 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Very good! You can definitely prove discriminatory treatment. Romney and Paul had run there before and were not subjected to the same weird scrutiny as Gingrich and Perry. The other three candidates didn’t even plan to run in VA, so they wouldn’t have been on the ballot anyway.

Also, from what I have read, the verification was a computerized scan that would have rejected an address if the signatory had written “St.” instead of “Street,” if the latter had been what he had put on his initial registration.


35 posted on 12/29/2011 12:57:10 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shield; Cincinatus' Wife

Not that intrade is so special ... but Rick Perry comes in third in Florida!


36 posted on 12/29/2011 12:57:19 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

LOL!
I’ m sure that proves to an idiot that Governors should break the law.


37 posted on 12/29/2011 12:59:53 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Good for Perry, good for Liberty and good for America.


38 posted on 12/29/2011 1:01:01 PM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
I’ m sure that proves to an idiot that Governors should break the law.

So you will follow a law, no matter how unethical it is or how much it disenfranchises people. Got it. You would have been very happy in 30's Germany.

39 posted on 12/29/2011 1:02:47 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Virginia GOP: Romney's favorite butt boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: formosa

I imagine that oath has something to do with “I will vote for the eventual nominee no matter which RINO s**tbird the elites shove down our throats.”


40 posted on 12/29/2011 1:05:36 PM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson