Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU
Good. I hope the rule changes

Yep, that would be great, a Federal Court telling a state political party what there rules have to be.

I never thought I'd see support for something like this on a "conservative" site.

21 posted on 12/29/2011 12:40:18 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Prokopton

I never thought I’d see support for a piece of garbage like Mitt Romney on a conservative website like this....yet there are a few here who either mistakenly believe that he is a conservative (even though he’s never done ONE damn conservative thing in his wretched political life) or they are mormons and would vote for Barak Obama if he converted.


44 posted on 12/29/2011 1:09:22 PM PST by Grunthor (Do you worship the State or do you worship the Lord? There is no middle ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Prokopton

Are you for Romney or Ron Paul?

from a purely legalistic perspective I agree with you.

But I DON’T want Romney or Paul to be nominated. I think that would result in a 2008 repeat.


54 posted on 12/29/2011 1:56:11 PM PST by ZULU (LIBERATE HAGIA SOPHIA!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Prokopton

“Yep, that would be great, a Federal Court telling a state political party what there rules have to be.”

Perry’s case rests on a similar one, where the US Supreme Court ruled that putting too many restrictions on who can collect signatures is a violation of the US Constitution.

If the state GOP ignored the law in making rules, then Perry has a case.


60 posted on 12/29/2011 2:27:09 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson