Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As usual, when we have a few bad apples, the Government wants to burn the entire orchard.
1 posted on 12/13/2011 9:44:20 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: alancarp

They should just ban automobiles.

Cars kill 30,000 to 40,000 people every year in the US.


2 posted on 12/13/2011 9:46:57 AM PST by jq2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

Texting, not talking, is the problem.


3 posted on 12/13/2011 9:49:23 AM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp
"The board doesn't have the power to impose regulations..."

If only the EPA, et al...

4 posted on 12/13/2011 9:49:44 AM PST by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

They can ban it all they want, but unless the cops actually pull people over and ticket them, they will keep doing it. Its illegal in our state already but I still see people on cell phones while driving, all the time! So, what good is the ban?


5 posted on 12/13/2011 9:52:48 AM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

More land of the used-to-be free news.

The sanction should be on ‘distracted driving’, not on a specific distraction. Do we want to be cited for even listening to a podcast via earbuds? I don’t think so.


7 posted on 12/13/2011 9:59:16 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

Do they intend to ban Hands Free cell phone use to? If all cell phone communication is banned, what about CB radios?

If I’ve got a cell phone up against my ear, they can see it, but if I’m talking hands free, or texting with the phone below eye sight, how will they tell? Will there be some kind of detection device to let them know a cell phone is in use?


8 posted on 12/13/2011 10:02:09 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

ignoring the political/philisophical prism many see this through, it is my direct and constant experience on US interstates that the majority of odd or erratic driving is by people who, when I pass them, either have a phone on their ear or are looking at something in their lap/hand.

The number of people who believe they drive well talking on a cell is much higher than the number that actually can allocate proper attention and response-time.


9 posted on 12/13/2011 10:02:49 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp
When this accident occurred, Missouri already had a law against drivers under 21 texting while driving.

Bizarre law, I know, but the fact is what he was doing was already illegal.

So how would another law change anything?

13 posted on 12/13/2011 10:13:10 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Holding our flawed politicians to higher standards than the enemyÂ’s politicians guarantees they win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp
I knew this thread would wander down the anecdotal experiences path...

It is an undeniable fact that accident rates have actually FALLEN over the past 15+ years. I am not just spouting made up statistics on this either. According to the NHTSA, in 2009 there were 5.5 million police-reported crashes. In 2003, there were 6.3 million crashes, and in 1997 there were 6.7 million crashes. The trends are distinctly downward over the years. This is an inescapable truth.

Now, let's think about that for a second. It is inarguable that in 1997, car phones (as we used to call them), while not rare, certainly were not around in the numbers we see today (even though we simply call them cell phones now). So let's agree that cell phone use (while driving) has increased as cell phones have become nearly ubiquitous among drivers. While not in the hands of every driver, we can be utterly certain there are exponentially more cell phones now than 15 years ago.

Since there are more cell phones in driver's hands, and they're so amazingly dangerous, why haven't accidents gone up? And this is using the RAW accident totals, not driver-mile rates. The 5.5 million accidents in 2009 would represent a much greater reduction when accounting for the increased number of drivers and miles driven.

So again, I ask, if cell phones are so elementarily causing accidents, why haven't there been more accidents as these devices have become common-place in the driver's hands?

The answer is simple. They really don't cause more accidents.

Source

Click CRASHES link in search categories.

15 posted on 12/13/2011 10:19:51 AM PST by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

In ground school, they teach you “never drop the airplane to fly the radio”. No cell phone call in the world is so important that it should interfere with a driver’s attention to the road, but with that in mind (and assuming the driver stays heads up), I have no problem with use of a handsfree device while on a voice call. Texting is another matter and should be banned because it diverts the driver’s sight from the road to the texting device.


22 posted on 12/13/2011 11:02:17 AM PST by Fast Moving Angel (Proud Right-Wing Trash -- stick it, Alec.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

DRIVING CELL PHONE USERS RECOMMEND BAN ON NTSB!


25 posted on 12/13/2011 11:07:50 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

Screw the NTSB. They cannot legislate according to the Constitution and this is an issue that should be up to the individual states.

That way, the more Commie-type states will ban it and the free ones (like mine) will not.


26 posted on 12/13/2011 11:08:30 AM PST by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp
Better: Defund and eliminate the NHTSB as a classic case of waste, fraud, and abuse.
27 posted on 12/13/2011 11:21:28 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

I been in two accidents involving some jackass on a cell phone, one of them near fatal.

Studies suggest that cell phone use impares a persons ability to drive to the same extent as driving under the influence.

Yet I HATE to see more laws on the books.

Just make it legal to beat the crap out of someone if they hit you due to cell use.


31 posted on 12/13/2011 1:11:15 PM PST by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

It is getting difficult to tell the difference between a cell phone user and a drunk/impaired driver. Poor lane discipline, erratic speed control, tailgating, unawareness of surroundings, all pretty much the same.

I’m sure everyone in this forum will insist they’re not affected by the distraction. I’ll just keep dodging them and let the voice mail catch the call . . .


34 posted on 12/13/2011 3:38:44 PM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”- Groucho Marx


37 posted on 12/15/2011 12:14:48 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson