The birthers press on

Renew America ^ | November 23, 2011 | Peter Lemiska

[STE=Q]

In a belated response to the birther movement, earlier this year the White House released Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate. Everyone believed it would finally silence the birthers; and it did -- for a while. But since then, various independent researchers, as well as experts in graphics, computer software, and scanning equipment, have examined the document and now allege that it shows signs of tampering.

[Marine_Uncle]

I’m still getting a kick out of the Russian broad throwing a hand insult at him while speaking his name on her network news.

[butterdezillion]

Google is apparently blocking any search for “Lamberth” for my blog site. It comes back saying that there aren’t any results for a search of Lamberth, Lambert, Lam, Lamb, etc. But when I searched under Royce there came back several instances, and just in scrolling down the page on my blog I saw several more that weren’t listed as a result of the Google search. So Google apparently doesn’t want me to locate the information about Lamberth.

(But - gasp! - that would be a CONSPIRACY! If Google is blocking results from my blog, that would be a conspiracy, and we all know that Google is as pure as the driven snow and would NEVER engage in CONSPIRACY to protect Obama and the corruptocracy! So this can’t be true. There really must not be ANY instances of Lam, Lamb, Lambert, or Lamberth on my blog, even though I can see at least 4 of them with my own eyeballs. There. Got that argument out of the way so the Obots here don’t have to bother to give their totally predictable, totally brainless, totally evidence-defying drivel. lol)

I’ll find it. It’s just gonna take up a bunch of my time. Sigh. The only thing these people do really well is waste other people’s time. In a just world I would charge them $50/hour for every hour of my time that they have wasted. I’d never have to work again.

[butterdezillion]

OK, forget Google. I found it on my own. Here was the initial comment:

“Hint: Lamberth was seen, BTW, at dinner with ERIC HOLDER, AG——
several times in DC. The “fix” was obviously in. (per DC POST data).
It is sad that a Reagan appointee would rule this way, and engage in collaboration and TREASON. May he too, meet the fate of the Rosenbergs. IMO

PS/ Lamberth made very unprofessional comments to Taitz in this
ruling. “OUT OF LUCK,”??? America is now near out of luck.
Taitz should file againt Lamberth for his vicious, sexist, and in-
temperate remarks. The DC Judiciary Board should be alerted
re this unprofessional commentary and snide attitude. Orly T.
should file a lawsuit against Lamberth for those remarks. Surely,
Ronald Reagan is rolling in his grave for appointing such Garbage
to the DC First Circuit Court. Outrage is not enough. Treason
is treason. IMO.”

And here was follow-up after I asked for more detail:

“The meetings were noted in passing only, in the STYLE section of the DC Post. As I recall, late 24-25 July (when he reprimanded Taitz), and again (2011), in early August, just passing dalliances between two demonic sweethearts. Reported on by two female reporterettes, p. 2, who run the Arts & Style section. (Gossip) They were seen together by SEVERAL witnesses. Also by the busboys, etc. No pictures were allowed...??? Why???
This was in EXPENSIVE restaurants in NW Wash, section called
GEORGETOWN. At the time, I noted it (7-8, 2011) as totally unethical.

I will try to find more. Others are welcome to do a microfiche search on the recent DC Post items. It is all so disgusting. Lamberth was obviously pressured/threatened. These people are “out of luck” traitors. They must be prosecuted and imprisoned. Judge or no Judge. This stuff is just in-your-face treason. This is NOT a lucky day for America. IMO

PS/ I did relate all on this to Orly Taitz, Esquire, LLC.

PPS/ We can just about guess what the meetings/shennanigans were all
about. Pressure, blackmail, pension promises, free meals, etc.

[butterdezillion]

Thanks, Yaelle. I’ve increased my work hours and also added another job so I’ve been really busy.

Seeing that there were some state lawmakers in NH who had the courage to speak in defense of the Constitution was a real boost, coming at a really low time when I’ve seen that none of the presidential candidates will have the courage needed to tackle the real enemies this nation faces. They would rather play deaf, dumb, and blind. It’s gonna be up to us. Seeing a reasonable article dealing with the NH situation was a pleasant surprise. It gives me hope that not everybody is willing to play dumb for Obama.

I’ve wondered about your pregnancy, and prayed for safety and health. I hope all is well with you. =)

[butterdezillion]

I hadn’t heard that theory. At this point I don’t put anything past Obama or his thugs. She got deathly ill with “cancer” awfully quick after being just fine and getting a hip replacement... And they got rid of her body awfully quick too...

My dad had a stroke 2 years ago. We thought we were gonna lose him. It was a four-hour drive from our house to the hospital where he was taken, and within about 7 hours of receiving the call that he was in bad shape I, my husband, and our 4 kids were all at that hospital, and we spent almost every waking moment for the next 3 days (until we had to go back home) in that hospital. My husband is a pastor and he sees the same thing all the time, regardless of whether the person’s demise was sudden or gradual coming on. Obama was the only one who went and he spent hardly any time with his grandma. Combined with all the other suspicious things surrounding her death, the whole thing is questionable.

Maybe we’re all just super-critical and conspiratorial, but it wouldn’t take much for the details of the illness and death to be verified. Non-certified copies of death certificates are required to be disclosed upon request just like non-certified COLB’s are required to be disclosed when anybody requests it, but just like everything else, Hawaii and Obama both refuse to obey the laws.

So - like with everything Obama - things smell real fishy but nobody will allow any fact-checking so we can find out what is true.

[butterdezillion]

In post 83 I copied what the poster told me. Around July 24-25, 2011, around when Lamberth reprimanded Taitz, and then again sometime in August of 2011. Two meetings in the expensive Georgetown section of the city, as reported in the DC Post, in the Arts & Style section (p. 2, he said) - reported as being seen by multiple people including the busboys. No photos allowed.

The poster suggested that somebody try to look on the microfilms for those dates. If there’s anybody who would be able to find the infor, it’s Freepers. But Obama’s people have been known to hide and/or alter microfilms from libraries so it would have to be checked soon.

It would be interesting to see the exact timing, and to do a FOIA request of Holder’s schedule and any other documents that might be related to those meetings.

If the DOJ has handled Obama’s defense since he was inaugurated, wouldn’t those be ex parte meetings with Lamberth? If so, then we have yet to meet an eligibility judge whose behavior hasn’t been unethical and/or suspicious.

[RaceBannon]

just for memory sake

Here are 6 African Newspaper articles calling Obama “Kenyan-Born”

Notice the first article was from Sunday, June 27, “2004”

Historical News Articles and FactCheck Agree: Obama is “Kenyan-born”

Posted on October 18th, 2009 by David-Crockett

Sunday, June 27, “2004”

Kenya Sunday Standard headline-”Kenyan-born” Obama all set for US Senate

http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born04.htm

The Nigerian Observer-Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next President with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The “Kenyan-born” Senator will…”

http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born01.htm

USAfrica — “Kenyan-born” OBAMA makes history…wins presidential nomination of U. S. Democratic party; eyes on White House…

http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/Born09.gif

AllAfrica.com — ” Little wonder then why “Kenyan-born” Barack Obama, America’s first Black President…”

http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born02.htm

GraphicGhana.com — “For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever “African-American President” on this presidential visit to the “continent of his birth”. The same article, with the same quote, appeared in ModernGhana.com.

http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born05-ContinentOfBirth.htm

The Ghana Times — “So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the “African-American Senator” from Illinois state. A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the “Kenyan born” American ahead of his rivel, John McCain.”

http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/Born07.bmp

[butterdezillion]

I just read Lamberth’s decision in Taitz v Astrue at http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2011cv00402/146770/33/ That is so maddening. Obama publicly released his tax return in a format that allowed the SSN to be seen. That is public disclosure. He has also claimed to be male and claimed to live in various places during his life. Those are the only things that Orly asked to remain unredacted on the requested SSN application.

If that SSN was for Barack Obama, then nothing that would be disclosed by the redacted form (showing only the gender, date, and location for the applicant) would be a violation of his privacy since he has already published claims about himself.

Royce Lamberth knows that the requested application form is not for Obama. He knows Obama is using a fraudulent SSN.

This is exactly the same thing that the HDOH is doing by saying they can’t release a copy of Obama’s long-form because of privacy interests. If Obama had actually published his genuine long-form, there would be no privacy exception to disclosure. Their claiming that there still exists a privacy exemption to disclosure is an indirect admission that what Obama published is NOT what they have in their office.

In the same way, the only way that application form would still have a privacy exemption to disclosure is if the applicant has never published their number, gender, date of application, or location. The only one of those things that has a significant privacy interest according to FOIA rules is the actual number itself or actual current home address of the applicant. Obama already published the number, and I guarantee the address he filed under is not the White House. Lamberth knows there is nothing requested that has a significant FOIA privacy interest UNLESS IT BELONGS TO SOMEBODY BESIDES OBAMA.

IOW, Lamberth has indirectly confirmed that the SSN Obama used on his tax return belongs to somebody besides Obama.

To counter Lamberth’s argument that this has nothing to do with agency actions, what SHOULD be requested is a record of the agency’s PROCESSING of that application - including when and where it was processed and any changes made to it. The entity that should actually be sued is the IRS, for failure to report and/or prosecute social security fraud or verify Obama’s SSN.

Lamberth tried to get rid of Orly’s suit by saying she didn’t properly redact the SSN’s. He alluded to Taitz claiming that somebody in his office had altered what she sent. Given what we saw by SCOTUS clerk Danny Bickel in Donofrio’s cases, anything is possible, but I haven’t seen her post copies of what she claims she sent so I don’t know. Anyway, Lamberth rebuked Orly on July 25th. If the DC Post article was published July 26 or 27th, that meeting may have taken place the same day as the rebuke or shortly after. About a month later was when Lamberth decided the case, indirectly admitting that the SSN doesn’t belong to Obama, but superficially getting rid of the case.

If that meeting was after Lamberth’s rebuke of Taitz it could have been Holder directing Lamberth to take the case head-on to dispose of it rather than allowing Taitz to properly file a new case somewhere else with a judge not as amenable to Holder’s control. On July 27th Lamberth allowed Taitz to file properly-redacted forms. That was hailed as a great breakthrough, a chance for justice to really be done - leading people to believe that Lamberth might be just after all, and making it seem like sour grapes when he was called a traitor after his final decision.

I think Lamberth had probably already been threatened into putty before this case ever came up, based on his earlier “tilting at windmills” ruling against Taitz. These meetings with Holder may well have been for devising a strategy though.

[rodguy911]

I readily admit I am not in your league when it comes to research. if I was on the ball I would have links for you regarding the Obama debacle with his granny and his visits to Hawaii.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-P3ZouVFr0

There I found it above.

Bottom line there are stills of zero creeping around behind the house after allegedly injecting her with what is believed to be Mercury after having done it before as well to create a buildup.
Also there was a grave that was set aside for her to be buried next to her husband but zero had her cremated only hours after her death which was unbelievably “sudden.”Can you say osammaaaaauuuhhh!!
It's interesting to say the least.

[Mr. K]

"...earlier this year the White House released Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate."

This is what GALLS me the most about the presstitutes for Obama. He did NOT release his 'long form' BC. It does not look like yours or mine, it SAYS RIGHT ON IT "ABSTRACT"

The whorenalists KNOW that it does not look like yours or mine, and they know you dont need to send a team of lawyers to sigh 'waivers' to get it (I bet Obama does not know that) ... but they report it as truth.

[rodguy911]

NOw, now Bevis just because I kicked the sh_t out of you on the other thread you don’t have to be a naughty little boy do you?

[butterdezillion]

I just started looking at those links, having just read Royce Lamberth’s decision that simply showing a form for SSN xxx-xx-xxxx that had the gender and location of the applicant and the date of the application would be a violation of the applicant’s privacy interest.

The first link I looked at talked about the Chicago Tribune (David Axelrod, I believe) getting a judge to unseal sealed divorce records where the wife said the husband took her to kinky sex clubs.

My first thought - after practically barfing at Obama’s “good-cop” routine of saying how much he “feels for” Ryan because of what he went through because of the disclosure - was, “Where is the judge’s decision, and what was his rationale for allowing those sealed divorce records regarding a married couple’s sex life to become public?”

Somebody needs to take the words of that judge’s ruling, word for word, and present them to Lamberth and every other eligibility judge, and then slam Obama for his double-standard. Maybe even file an equal protection lawsuit against these judges - because David Axelrod and the Chicago machine’s “freedom of information” was protected so they were able to get lurid details from a divorce proceeding but OUR “freedom of information” was violated so we could not even get disclosures for which there IS a legitimate public interest and for which there is NO exemption to disclosure.

Make Lamberth deal with the blatant hypocrisy and the selective interpretation of the laws for political purposes. Smack him between the eyes with that reality that we can all see painfully and sickeningly clearly.

[rodguy911]

Axelrod's ugly hand shows up everywhere in the regime and when you listen to him on TV the only one giving off more talking points (which he probably originated and gave to the dnc) is debby blabbermouth herself. Hence, I think Axel plays a much bigger part in the regime than anyone knows. He may be the point man for Soros or others for all we know.

I think you are absolutely correct to speculate that these judges are intimated like mad and probably scared to death to go up against the regime or the Chicago machine. They know all too well what happens to them or relatives or both.

[Lazamataz]

NOw, now Bevis just because I kicked the sh_t out of you on the other thread you don’t have to be a naughty little boy do you?

It is appropriate you call me Beavis.

You are, indeed, a Butt Head.

Delusional, at that.

[rodguy911]

settle down little doggie settle down,all the crying will be over before you know it.

[JohnnyP]

Axelrod has developed a maddening filibustering technique. He makes a point while talking normally, then you sense he will need to take a breath at the end of this sentence, so it will be the host’s turn to talk.

But he tricks you because he saved enough breath to ad a comma rather than a period, and starts another point, then takes a breath mid sentence when you can’t interrupt him.

I’ve heard one or two liberal callers do this on the radio.

[Elderberry]

And I remember that in Rhodes v. MacDonald Holder was supposedly seen with Judge Land before his ruling.

[Lazamataz]

Why do you object, butt head? After all, all I am doing is holding you to your own standard! You know, the one where unless you are in a given field, your opinion is useless!

I intend to hold you to your own standard, butt head! LOL! :)

[butterdezillion]

Interesting. Do you remember where you heard that from?

[Elderberry]

Here’s one reference:
http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=11352

October 4, 2009 – Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. submits an unauthenticated affidavit in Rhodes v. MacDonald by a Birther who swears he saw AG Eric Holder in a coffee shop in Columbus, Georgia; of course, there to pressure Judge Clay Land, who had never met the man in his life. This was supposed to have happened during a hearing on Cook v. Good, on a day Holder was in Los Angeles promoting the Recovery Act.