just for memory sake
Here are 6 African Newspaper articles calling Obama “Kenyan-Born”
Notice the first article was from Sunday, June 27, “2004”
Historical News Articles and FactCheck Agree: Obama is “Kenyan-born”
Posted on October 18th, 2009 by David-Crockett
Sunday, June 27, “2004”
Kenya Sunday Standard headline-”Kenyan-born” Obama all set for US Senate
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born04.htm
The Nigerian Observer-Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next President with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The “Kenyan-born” Senator will…”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born01.htm
USAfrica — “Kenyan-born” OBAMA makes history…wins presidential nomination of U. S. Democratic party; eyes on White House…
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/Born09.gif
AllAfrica.com — ” Little wonder then why “Kenyan-born” Barack Obama, America’s first Black President…”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born02.htm
GraphicGhana.com — “For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever “African-American President” on this presidential visit to the “continent of his birth”. The same article, with the same quote, appeared in ModernGhana.com.
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born05-ContinentOfBirth.htm
The Ghana Times — “So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the “African-American Senator” from Illinois state. A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the “Kenyan born” American ahead of his rivel, John McCain.”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/Born07.bmp
I just started looking at those links, having just read Royce Lamberth’s decision that simply showing a form for SSN xxx-xx-xxxx that had the gender and location of the applicant and the date of the application would be a violation of the applicant’s privacy interest.
The first link I looked at talked about the Chicago Tribune (David Axelrod, I believe) getting a judge to unseal sealed divorce records where the wife said the husband took her to kinky sex clubs.
My first thought - after practically barfing at Obama’s “good-cop” routine of saying how much he “feels for” Ryan because of what he went through because of the disclosure - was, “Where is the judge’s decision, and what was his rationale for allowing those sealed divorce records regarding a married couple’s sex life to become public?”
Somebody needs to take the words of that judge’s ruling, word for word, and present them to Lamberth and every other eligibility judge, and then slam Obama for his double-standard. Maybe even file an equal protection lawsuit against these judges - because David Axelrod and the Chicago machine’s “freedom of information” was protected so they were able to get lurid details from a divorce proceeding but OUR “freedom of information” was violated so we could not even get disclosures for which there IS a legitimate public interest and for which there is NO exemption to disclosure.
Make Lamberth deal with the blatant hypocrisy and the selective interpretation of the laws for political purposes. Smack him between the eyes with that reality that we can all see painfully and sickeningly clearly.
