bfl
"Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me."
Atta go Dr. Pollard!
This phony birth certificate and the mugs that are being sold with it are also the Messiah's way of giving the middle finger as has been his habit: HERE and HERE.
This is the dangerous, immature creature that people elected to be President.
the lack of anti-aliasing in certain areas is all you need to determine it was a forgery. i say this as someone that has written scanner drivers and imaging software working with scanned images.
beyond this, even if you accept the document as real... all it proves is that 0bama is native born.
his father was not a US citizen at the time of his birth, therefore he can only be native born
in order to be natural born, BOTH parents have to be US citizens at the time of birth. the founders put this language in the Constitution specifically to insure future presidents would not have loyalties to any other country due to parental allegiances. if not for this reason, the founders could have just used the word ‘citizen’.
as for the fake, if you haven’t seen this, you should:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY
if 0bama queues up for the 2012 election, both the authenticity of the documents and his native born status should be issues to getting on the ballot
Well done old FRiend!
I liked this post at that YouTube vid:
— — —
“Feb 20th I asked my 7 year-old niece “What day is tomorrow?”
She said, “It’s President’s Day!” (She is a smart kid.)
I asked, “What does President’s Day mean?” I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln ... etc.
She replied, “President’s Day is when President Obama steps out of the White House, and if he sees his shadow we have one more year of unemployment.”
You know, it hurts when hot coffee spurts out your nose.....
lv2surf 4 weeks ago 4”
The intent, Polland explained, was to enable critics to point to the anomalies as evidence of forgery, so Obama supporters could refute the objections by explaining that the anomalies could be produced, for instance, by running various optimizing, sharpening and adaptive compression procedures resident in Adobe software.
In other words, he's blaming some hypothetical forger because people made themselves look like idiots.
If there was a forger, he was trying to recreate the actual look of a document of the era. If somebody was dumb enough not to know what traces fountain pens or manual typewriters left it wasn't because some forger was diabolically trying to draw them in, it's because they were just that dumb.
It would have been better for Polland not to comment on those earlier mistakes. Say we could understand and excuse those earlier missteps -- bringing them up all over again attributing them to some devlishly clever forger means Polland loses all credibility from now on.
Is this is the guy who says:
I created Obama’s short-form birth certificate in 2008, and now I made Obama’s long-form birth certificate. My recreation of the short-form was so convincing, the White House posted it on the White House website, claiming it was the real deal
In August 2008, I successfully duplicated the short-form in what I believe is the only way it could have been made. Now I have re-created the long-form with a forgery of my own that I believe most people will find hard to distinguish from the forgery the White House released.
If so, he's more of a kook than anybody imagined.
I think that the forger just plain forgot to flatten it to one level.
The forger IS an amateur! Mixing CMYK and Grayscale in the document. That’s bush league! He’s an amateur, but he’s getting away with it, but not by his own accord.
What's going on here? Mind reading? How is it possible to read a person's intentions?
It is far better to stick with objective **fact**. Obama posted a forgery and that is a fact. Obama could have easily posted a clean document that could be easily and objectively certifiable. He didn't and that's a fact.
Don’t forget to explain how they got the Hawaii officials to say that two certified copies were sent (which implies two distinct seals). Also remember to explain the high res image that has a different seal than the “forged” copy but none of the evidence of “forgery”.