1 posted on
10/13/2011 6:16:11 PM PDT by
mdittmar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: mdittmar
Meaning they actually have to pay taxes, instead of having taxes paid to them.
2 posted on
10/13/2011 6:17:02 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
To: mdittmar
“Experts” is that somebody from out of town, or a drip under pressure?
3 posted on
10/13/2011 6:17:37 PM PDT by
West Texas Chuck
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)
To: mdittmar
It took 4 people to write this drivel for the Washington Compost?
4 posted on
10/13/2011 6:19:19 PM PDT by
jimbo123
To: mdittmar
"Right now, we have a strongly progressive income tax. High-income people are paying a higher share of income in taxes than lower-income people,I thought the rich were getting out of paying taxes. Which is it?
5 posted on
10/13/2011 6:20:48 PM PDT by
Kenny
To: mdittmar
I thought the rich didn’t pay their fair share. Now they argue that the rich pay more than the poor. LOL!
6 posted on
10/13/2011 6:21:35 PM PDT by
nhwingut
(Draft Palin '12...)
To: mdittmar
Somebody finally did a little homework and realizes that 999 is just the old salesman's gimmick.
Catchy isn't it!! You see it in every ad every day!!!
To: mdittmar
If a person is an American citizen, then they have to have skin in the game. Everyone pays or no one pays......Just the way it is.
8 posted on
10/13/2011 6:22:43 PM PDT by
RC2
To: mdittmar
low- and middle-income Americans would pay more.Low income people now pay NOTHING. I would have no problem if they had some skin in the game.
10 posted on
10/13/2011 6:23:39 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: mdittmar
Does being unemployed hurt the poor?
Sorry. Dumb question.
11 posted on
10/13/2011 6:24:06 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: mdittmar
"For starters, about 30 million of the poorest households pay neither income taxes nor Social Security or Medicare levies....And you are adding both a 9 percent sales tax and 9 percent income tax. So we know they will be worse off That makes no flippin' sense. They don't pay income tax but adding a 9% income tax makes them worse off. Huh?
13 posted on
10/13/2011 6:26:43 PM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Attacking Wall Street because you're jobless is like burning down Whole Foods because you're hungry.)
To: mdittmar
Right now, we have a strongly progressive income tax. High-income people are paying a higher share of income in taxes than lower-income people,And the greedy bastards still aren't paying their fair share. /s
16 posted on
10/13/2011 6:28:10 PM PDT by
umgud
To: mdittmar
The liberals will hammer Cain on 999 as hurting the poor.
The conservatives don’t like 999 because it implements a new Federal Sales Tax and conservatives don’t trust govt.
Cain needs to tone down his 999 plan and instead focus on reducing the cost of govt.
To: mdittmar
I have only one thing to say.
We will never again be a truly FREE people for so long as we continue to abide the communist inspired, class warfare inducing, income tax and the IRS!
26 posted on
10/13/2011 6:36:29 PM PDT by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: mdittmar
As an SS recipentwith very little outside income and very little chance of any, the 999 plan does disturb me somewhat.
With my income, 9% would make it my largest expense outside rent and food. Then, adding 9% sales tax on all purchases would mean an effective increase of more than 14%.
Where is the savings for the millions of people just like me?
28 posted on
10/13/2011 6:37:28 PM PDT by
fantail 1952
(When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary to seperate Americans from thin tormentor)
To: mdittmar
“High-income people are paying a higher share of income in taxes than lower-income people”
Somebody should tell the idiot in the white house
30 posted on
10/13/2011 6:37:58 PM PDT by
italianquaker
( Mr Obama inherited an AAA rating and made it AA, thnx Resident Zero)
To: mdittmar
When did terms like fair share and everyone having skin in the game become achievers pay while parasites live off the achievers?
To: mdittmar
Folks, have you seen the so called poor!!! TVs, I-Pods, fancy cars, $200.00 sneakers, expensive clothing of all sorts, and....they should not pay a sales tax??? And......and what about the vast underground that skates free of any taxation. Mr. Cain, I do not say that your 9-9-9 plan is the end all, but it is a start. This screwed up present tax system must go!!! And....with it the destruction of a good part of the IRS which alone would save billions!!! Onward, Cain!!! The people are behind you!!!! You are indeed a true Profile in Courage!!!
To: mdittmar
Cains 9-9-9 tax plan hits poor, helps wealthy, experts say
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bonus!
Yet another reason why 999 is good for America.
34 posted on
10/13/2011 6:42:10 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: mdittmar
“The poor” aren’t paying their fair share...TAX THE POOR!
If the lowest earners paid the highest percentage of their income and it started decreasing around $25,000, it would be a good incentive for improving their skill set and value in the market place.
You could make workers under 25 exempt.
37 posted on
10/13/2011 6:45:09 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
To: mdittmar
Someone needs to convince Cain to shitcan his 999.
38 posted on
10/13/2011 6:46:23 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson