Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Individual Health Insurance Mandate ‘Should Not Be Controversial’
Cybercast News Service ^ | 8/15/11 | Nicholas Ballasy

Posted on 08/15/2011 4:02:34 PM PDT by Nachum

On his bus tour, President Barack Obama said the federal health care law’s individual mandate, which requires every American to purchase health insurance, “should not be controversial.” To date, 26 states have sued the federal government, arguing that the individual mandate is unconstitutional because the U.S. Constitution does not grant Congress the power to require Americans to purchase a good or service. “Here’s the problem – if an insurance company has to take you, has to insure you, even if you’re sick but you don’t have an individual mandate, then what would everybody do?

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.cloud.clearpathhosting.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: health; individual; insurance; obama; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Obama, you slime
1 posted on 08/15/2011 4:02:43 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 08/15/2011 4:03:27 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
President Barack Obama said the federal health care law’s individual mandate.......“should not be controversial.”

Proof positive that he is no Constitutional scholar (as if we needed more proof).

3 posted on 08/15/2011 4:06:10 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 (The Tea Party didn't start the fire - they sounded the alarm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

46 Days And FR Is Still Short Of Its Goal

We Are In A Fight For Our Republic

Are You In Or Are You Out?

Support Free Republic

4 posted on 08/15/2011 4:06:46 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“should not be controversial.”

Slaves must obey their masters. There is no other option.

5 posted on 08/15/2011 4:07:40 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I don’t think I’ve ever heard a more arrogant utterance in my life.

It leaves “let them eat cake” in the dust.


6 posted on 08/15/2011 4:07:57 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“should not be controversial.”

Just do as I say. The law be damned.


7 posted on 08/15/2011 4:08:02 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

That has nothing to do with it. He’s propagandizing.


8 posted on 08/15/2011 4:08:19 PM PDT by Huck (Here's the bad news--Gov. Perry is the best we've got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama can be tone deaf, if those are the right words, to describe how blind he seems to reality. Doesn’t he remember the struggle over healthcare, and the fact that the whole darn bill was controversial? Each individual piece of it was controversial. When new provisions were revealed after the bill passed, which we didn’t know about up front because nobody could read the 2000 pages before it was passed, they also became controversial.

Well, Barack, it was controversial enough that many lawsuits were filed to test whether that law is even constitutional. I know that offends your liberal sensibilities, but that’s the situation.


9 posted on 08/15/2011 4:10:16 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Here’s the problem, Zero. If every American wanted to buy health insurance, he would. If every American wanted to eat arugula, he would. If we don’t want to, you don’t have the authority to force us. We will take you down, you pipsqueak Mugabe wannabe.


10 posted on 08/15/2011 4:14:42 PM PDT by Tax-chick (The Commie Plot Theory of Everything. Give it a try - you'll be surprised how often it makes sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Hey, 26 states out of 57 isn’t even a majority...:^)


11 posted on 08/15/2011 4:14:42 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
...law’s individual mandate, which requires every American to purchase health insurance, “should not be controversial.”

It isn't the leats bit controversial, or won't be, exactly onse second after Obama can show me where he gets the authority to order anyone to buy anything.

12 posted on 08/15/2011 4:18:12 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Really? Before YOU require Americans to do something, you should be required to:

a) verify your birth documents
b) verify your social security number
c) verify your Selective Service Registration

Oh, and there should be an investigation regarding that pesky Rezko land deal...


13 posted on 08/15/2011 4:20:29 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

14 posted on 08/15/2011 4:22:20 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

quote “Here’s the problem – if an insurance company has to take you, has to insure you, even if you’re sick but you don’t have an individual mandate, then what would everybody do? They would wait until they get sick and then you’d buy health insurance, right?”

well DUH!

we TRIED to tell you this before you passed this POS legislation! But NOOOOOO you wouldn’t LISTEN then!


15 posted on 08/15/2011 4:24:14 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

How sweet, Obama just made our case for us for why the WHOLE law has to be thrown out.

The individual mandate CAN NOT be seperated from the rest of the law, for EXACTLY the reason HE just laid out. If the court finds the mandate unconstitutional... then it HAS to throw it all out, there is no other choice.


16 posted on 08/15/2011 4:30:48 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He has no idea. Especially since he is immune.

JP Morgan Chase has already warned employees of drastic coverage changes ahead, to be revealed this next health care coverage ‘season’ in late autumn. It’s August, and employees already know this.


17 posted on 08/15/2011 4:44:04 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

According to the great Obamanation, it... “shouldn’t be controversial.” Yet for some strange reason, Americans hate it! Could it be they don’t like being told they have to buy something to take care of illegal aliens and deadbeats who won’t take care of themselves?


18 posted on 08/15/2011 4:46:17 PM PDT by rex regnum insanit (falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Obama is a born oppressor. He is fundamentally opposed to individual freedom and slips like this show a little corner of his Stalinist interior.
19 posted on 08/15/2011 4:47:06 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Individual Mandate is not controversial, it is unconstitutional. Nothing controversial about it being unconstitutional.


20 posted on 08/15/2011 4:49:11 PM PDT by No Truce With Kings (Ten years on FreeRepublic and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson