Skip to comments.Ed Rendell: Hillary Clinton can't resist White House run
Posted on 08/15/2011 8:30:28 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
She should run in 2012. I know she won’t, but it would be fun to watch.
I think it would be better to run against Ubama than Hillary Rob'em Clinton.
But Hillary has said that she has no plans to ever run for president again.
Bill Clinton said that Hillary wants to be a grandmother more than she ever wanted to be president.
Considering the tabloid gossip about Chelsea’s marriage, Hillary may not become a grandma anytime soon.
Oh boy, another bubble butt in the white house.
Just another crook again...and a pervert at that.
She does carry a lot of weight though. Her rear looks as if she is wearng two overstuffed throw pillows.
PIAPS will run against zero. Unless, the 25th is invoked and as VP she’ll run against Perry, Buchmann or Palin.
She’ll be entering her 70th year in 2016.
“Her life is public service, thats all she cares about”
Riiiiight! Yeah sure. Tha’s all she cares about, serving the public. All these stinking life long parasite politicians only care about “service” and not about power and control. How I despise those liberal ba$terds.
Well if she wants to run, she’d better start resisting the booze.
If you believe that then I have a bridge for sale real cheap.
I'll even throw in an autographed photo of Monica.
If we learned one thing from the two grifters, the only thing they care about. is themselves and NOTHING else.. NOTHING
“I know she wont...”
I don’t know that.
She’s a MARXIST, pure and simple, plus being a dyke.
That would open the way for Clinton or some other to become the nominee.
Dems lost the House and almost certainly will lose the Senate in 2012. With ‘bama’s bummer numbers, they don't want to lose the WH, too. His 39% approval [Gallup yesterday] number is not encouraging.
The Dems have nobody new that approaches a national stature..Anthony Weiner is perhaps the best known Dem in the country after Obama..
Her life is public service, thats all she cares about...”
And that’s exactly the problem with our career politicians. These “politiholics” are one dimensional people who will say or do anything to stay in office. What we need instead are transient politicians who may serve for a period of time but have a life and interests outside of politics. They care about other things besides a “life in public service”.
According to rasmussenreports, Obama still enjoys high approval from liberal dems and about 2/3 from self-styled conservative dems. I don’t see Clinton getting any traction in that case. Not to mention giving Obama the opportunity to call her a Judas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.