My graph here shows how it went for Reagan after he won the nomination and could start the national Republican campaign to counter the media.
Posted on 08/11/2011 2:33:03 PM PDT by Polybius
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Whom do you support?
.
My graph here shows how it went for Reagan after he won the nomination and could start the national Republican campaign to counter the media.
My gosh, using old polls with Trump and Huckabee?
You really do hate the females.
“FYI! More than anyone, Sarah Palin is aware of her negatives, and she is above all else, a God loving Christian conservative, home grown American patiot, who knows election 2012 *must be won* by a TEA Party Republican.”
That is exactly why her negatives are astronomical and why she is so hated by a vast majority of Americans. A majority of people United States has turned their back God and mocks him and people who follow Him like Sarah Palin.
What you are seeing happen here in the US is no coincidence. God is punishing this nation for embracing abortion, the gay culture and many other wing idea’s. This nation is finished and we have brought upon ourselves by turning our back on God.
We may get rid of of Obama in 2012 but the damage is done and a with the new President most likely being Romney or Perry, RINO’s, what needs to get done to fix this nation won’t get done.
I’m a Palin supporter and I thought the theater release of TU was a mistake before it started.
But
1) Fox News does the worst polls of any new organization—and that’s saying something, and
2) To repeat myself that’s a useless question at this stage in the game.
Don't look at only the "Yes" or "No" answers. Pay close attention to the percentages of "Don't know yet" and the "Never Heard Of Them" answers.
The question is, basically, "Would this person make a good spouse?"
When a candidates has a high percentage of "Don't Know Yet" or "Never Heard Of Them", that means that the candidate has just left home to pick up his blind date or has just finished his first date.
Apart from the voters that are already willing to marry him, Perry also has 44% of all voters that he can wine and dine and woo to the altar.
Obama, by contrast, is already in a marriage, going on three years. In this marriage, 31% would marry Obama again, 23% are thinking about running off with the UPS guy and 46% of all voters are saying to him, "I DEFINITELY want a divorce!"
Perry, as the new suiter, has the advantage.
You convey my sentiments, precisely. I want so badly for her to toss her hat into the ring. But, I must say, in view of the savage in the White House, I would fear for her life every moment of her candidacy. That filthy SOB could shoot her point blank and get away with. His media whores would guarantee that. And I think he would, just to prove it.
Nah, it very well could be worse.
With little bammy still in but even more Republicans and Conservatives in the House and Senate we would have gridlock and nothing changes in four years.
Most certainly with Mittwitt and to a lesser degree with PRIC Rick we will see "bipartisan" surrender legislation.
First thing up will be "bipartisan immigration reform." It will not matter what will be second or third because once that occurs with Mittwitt and probably with Rick the PRIC the additional 30-35 million government tit drones heading into the voting booth will blow this nation right into the history books as the evil white empire is gloriously defeated by the New Shining Path Warriors or some other such commie BS.
If you think that will not be done with Mittwitt or PRIC Perry just remember the revered George Bush was in the SEVENTH year of his term before pulling that little stunt.
We do not need that again and folks need to be reminded of the gut fear that prevailed when our own Republican President stated before the cameras in Bulgeria, "I'll see you at the bill signing."
We do NOT need a half-azzed RINO or PRIC for President.
We have GOT to have a true conservative.
.
Thanks.
They must have polled only Democrats in San Francisco.
Because half the jobs in the country have been created in Texas during the Obama Presidency?
Any candidate without sufficient name recognition is going to suffer in a Presidential poll against the incumbent.
But, the polls are very relevant when the challenger has nearly 100% name recognition.
So, the same polls showing Obama tanking are being rigged against Palin?
Viewing someone favorable and thinking they would make a good President are two different things.
Because the election is about the economy and because Texas has, by far, the best state economy in the nation?
I'd be more than happy if Perry did for the nation what he has done for Texas. The Texas economy is Reaganesque in a nation whose economy is Carteresque.
I read it - Amen! Run Sarah Run!
(By the legislature, not the Governor?)
ALL the polls have Obama 10 points mim higher than he really is. If they say 40 you can take off 10 points.
Can you not read?? I said I held these views about polling prior to even hearing of Gov Palin.
BTW who is your candidate this month?
RS I believe you will like this, it covers your man Perry
as well as Bachmann
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.