Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC's Williams: 'Astounding' Food Stamp 'Numbers Would Come As a Huge Disappointment to' LBJ
NewsBusters ^ | 4 Aug 2011 | Mike Bates

Posted on 08/04/2011 12:30:07 PM PDT by mandaladon

On Wednesday's NBC Nightly News, anchor Brian Williams reported on another development in the Great Obama Recovery:

"We saw some astounding new numbers that came out today. They showed the number of Americans relying on food stamps has hit another all-time record. These numbers would come as a huge disappointment to President Lyndon Johnson, who launched his War on Poverty back in 1964. Nearly 46 million of your fellow citizens are receiving food stamp assistance. That represents 21 million American households. Numbers went up in 49 out of 50 states."

Certainly discouraging numbers, but not astounding. Unless, of course, you somehow expected the machinations of President Barack Obama & Associates to do anything other than kill any hope of economic recuperation.

President Lyndon Johnson may have been disappointed, but the chief warrior in the War on Poverty shouldn't be given total credit, if that's the correct word, for the food stamp program. That distinction belongs to another liberal hero, John F. Kennedy.

According to the JFK Presidential Library and Museum's Web site, on February 2, 1961, Kennedy asked "Congress for program to help end recession, including food stamps, extended benefits for unemployed workers and welfare payments for their children." This was followed by his first executive order, which announced a three-year food stamp "pilot" program. We all know what happens to temporary government programs; his successor and Congress made it permanent with the Food Stamp Act of 1964:

The Department (of Agriculture) estimated that participation in a national FSP would eventually reach 4 million, at a cost of $360 million annually.

Kennedy brother-in-law Sargent Shriver ran LBJ's Office of Economic Opportunity. In 1967, when about $700 million a year was devoted to food assistance programs, Shriver estimated that another billion dollars would permanently solve the problem of hunger in America.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: economy; obama; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
That was $66 billion ago. If anything's astounding, it's that most in the mainstream media never question why, after trillions of tax dollars spent on fighting poverty, there's so little, if any, improvement. And it's questionable that Kennedy and Johnson, both of whom thought Washington had the solutions, would be all that disappointed to see so many Americans dependent on government for help. ________________________________________________

Redistribution of wealth DOES NOT WORK. When are the liberal idiots going to learn?

1 posted on 08/04/2011 12:30:10 PM PDT by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Kennedy brother-in-law Sargent Shriver ran LBJ's Office of Economic Opportunity. In 1967, when about $700 million a year was devoted to food assistance programs, Shriver estimated that another billion dollars would permanently solve the problem of hunger in America.

Hmmm. That's interesting information. Does Maria know her father was a moron?

2 posted on 08/04/2011 12:32:24 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

When you hand out money, Brian, people will take it. Try to wrap your vapid, news anchor pea brain around that concept.


3 posted on 08/04/2011 12:33:40 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Yeah, it must be LBJ’s fault.

Or... well... ANYONE but Obama, who’s driven the economy of the United States to its knees.

The worst president, by far, in the entire history of the nation remains a media hero.


4 posted on 08/04/2011 12:34:59 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Clearly the fault of “greedy”, exploitative whites, correct OrangeFace?


5 posted on 08/04/2011 12:37:21 PM PDT by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Redistribution of wealth DOES NOT WORK.

Work? You must be assuming a goal that these people don't have. Because it IS WORKING for THEIR goals.

6 posted on 08/04/2011 12:39:17 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Interesting article. Remember that a liberal media type wrote this. And even Williams acknowledges the complete and utter failure of LBJ’s Great Society programs as we see the aftermath.

But yet... Will he or any other liberal call for halting (or even slowing down) the widespread abuses of the food stamp fiasco?

Nope. Democrats know that the wealthy will pay for it all. And the poor will keep voting for more “free pie”.


7 posted on 08/04/2011 12:41:34 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (The views and opinions expressed in this post are true and correct. Deal with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

if you can’t win a war in 47 years you are obviously employing the wrong strategy.


8 posted on 08/04/2011 12:42:17 PM PDT by beekay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Exactly. and if wealthy lib TV anchors don’t believe it, they can check out some of their own like Sam Donaldson and his sheep rance subsidies!!!


9 posted on 08/04/2011 12:42:59 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard; mandaladon

“When you hand out money, Brian, people will take it. Try to wrap your vapid, news anchor pea brain around that concept.”

Exactly!

“They showed the number of Americans relying on food stamps has hit another all-time record.”

The reality is:

“They showed the number of Americans taking advantage of free handouts has hit another all-time record.”


10 posted on 08/04/2011 12:45:25 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

“Hmmm. That’s interesting information. Does Maria know her father was a moron?”

Sure she does, that’s why she married Arnold. She wanted a moron for a husband, just like daddy was.


11 posted on 08/04/2011 12:46:32 PM PDT by brownsfan (I miss the America I grew up in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Lyndon Bird was a real help to our nation.

We can thank Kennedy’s handlers for pairing these two up on a ticket.

And don’t forget those criminals who planned and carried out the assassination under someone’s orders.


12 posted on 08/04/2011 12:46:48 PM PDT by IbJensen (God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The first guy to get food stamps, I think he was from West Virginia, said after a few months he notifed the county that he didn’t need them anymore because he’d found a job. Guess what. He could never get them to stop sending them to him.


13 posted on 08/04/2011 12:46:51 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

He would not be disappointed, rather, he would be glad.

LBJ: “I’ll have those n***** voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”

Now, blacks are twice as likely to use food stamps as whites and other minorities are attracted to the democrats bag of goodies. Food stamps, section 8, ssi, medicaid, free cellphones, affirmative action, set asides, EIC, half of the country has no income tax liability, etc. They have fostered dependency for political gain and our country has been financially ruined. Forget the debt, our unfunded entitlement liabilities, which do not show up in the debt calculation, are at least four times the national debt.


14 posted on 08/04/2011 12:49:58 PM PDT by jimnm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

record number on food stamps
record numbe.er of obese people

coincidence?

(hint: not many “rich” people are fat)


15 posted on 08/04/2011 12:50:16 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

b


16 posted on 08/04/2011 12:50:39 PM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimnm

Rush put it well today: Taking from those who will not vote for you and giving to those who will.


17 posted on 08/04/2011 12:57:10 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Nuts; A house divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000
These numbers would come as a huge disappointment to President Lyndon Johnson, who launched his War on Poverty back in 1964.

No. They want you broken and strung out. Then, they own you.

They don't want a "solution"--they want you under their feet.


18 posted on 08/04/2011 1:00:55 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

LBJ wouldn’t be disappointed -

To the contrary, he would be as happy as a democrat at a Che Guevera rally.

It is well known and documented that the driving force behind LBJ’s “War On Poverty” was his desire to to create a new class of people dependant on federal government handouts. He intentionally developed programs to create a huge welfare class with the goal of inculcating loyalty to the democrat party as the patron of the modern welfare state.

He wouldn’t be disappointed but might be pleasantly surprised at just how successful his programs have been in creating a class of people happy to live off handouts.


19 posted on 08/04/2011 1:02:15 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beekay
if you can’t win a war in 47 years you are obviously employing the wrong strategy.

We're obviously bogged down and in a quagmire. I expect Williams next observation will be to ask the President what our exit strategy should be in regards to the War on Poverty.

Yea - that's gonna happen.............

20 posted on 08/04/2011 1:02:51 PM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson