Posted on 07/20/2011 7:21:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
While liberals are certain about the moral superiority of liberal policies, the truth is that those policies actually diminish a societys moral character. Many individual liberals are fine people, but the policies they advocate tend to make a people worse. Here are ten reasons:
1. The bigger the government, the less the citizens do for one another. If the state will take care of me and my neighbors, why should I? This is why Western Europeans, people who have lived in welfare states far longer than Americans have, give less to charity and volunteer less time to others than do Americans of the same socioeconomic status.
The greatest description of American civilization was written in the 19th century by the Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville. One of the differences distinguishing Americans from Europeans that he most marveled at was how much Americans through myriad associations took care of one another. Until Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt began the seemingly inexorable movement of America toward the European welfare state vastly expanded later by other Democratic presidents Americans took responsibility for one another and for themselves far more than they do today. Churches, Rotary Clubs, free-loan societies, and other voluntary associations were ubiquitous. As the state grew, however, all these associations declined. In Western Europe, they have virtually all disappeared.
2. The welfare state, though often well intended, is nevertheless a Ponzi scheme. Conservatives have known this for generations. But now any honest person must acknowledge it. The welfare state is predicated on collecting money from todays workers in order to pay for those who paid in before them. Unfortunately, todays workers dont have enough money to sustain the scheme, because there are too few of them to do so. As a result, virtually every welfare state in Europe, along with many American states, like California, is going broke.
3. Citizens of liberal welfare states become increasingly narcissistic. The great preoccupations of vast numbers of Brits, Frenchmen, Germans, and other Western Europeans are how much vacation time they will have and how early they can retire and be supported by the state.
4. The liberal welfare state makes people disdain work. Americans work considerably harder than Western Europeans, and, contrary to liberal thought since Marx, work builds character.
5. Nothing more guarantees the erosion of character than getting something for nothing. In the liberal welfare state, one develops an entitlement mentality another expression of narcissism. And the rhetoric of liberalism labeling each new entitlement a right reinforces this sense of entitlement.
6. The bigger the government, the more the corruption. As the famous truism goes, Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Of course, big businesses are also often corrupt. But they are eventually caught or go out of business. The government cannot go out of business. And, unlike corrupt governments, corrupt businesses cannot print money and thereby devalue a nations currency, and they cannot arrest you.
7. The welfare state corrupts family life. Even many Democrats have acknowledged the destructive consequences of the welfare state on the underclass. It has rendered vast numbers of males unnecessary to females, who have looked to the state to support them and their children (and the more children, the more state support) rather than to husbands. In effect, these women took the state as their husband.
8. The welfare state inhibits the maturation of its young citizens into responsible adults. As regards men specifically, I was raised, as were all generations of American men before me, to aspire to work hard in order to marry and to support a wife and children. No more. One of the reasons many single women lament the prevalence of boy-men men who have not grown up is that the liberal state has told men they dont have to support anybody. They are free to remain boys for as long as they want.
And here is an example regarding both sexes. The loudest and most sustained applause I ever heard was that of college students responding to a speech by Pres. Barack Obama informing them that they would now be covered by their parents health-insurance policies until age 26.
9. As a result of the Lefts sympathetic views of pacifism, and because almost no welfare state can afford a strong military, European countries rely on America to fight the worlds evils and even to defend them.
10. The leftist weltanschauung sees societys and the worlds great battle as between rich and poor rather than between good and evil. Equality therefore trumps morality. This is what produces the morally confused liberal elites that can venerate a Cuban tyranny with its egalitarian society over a free and decent America that has greater inequality.
None of this matters to progressives. Against all this destructiveness, they will respond not with arguments to refute these consequences of the liberal welfare state, but by citing the terms social justice and compassion, and by labeling their opponents selfish and worse.
If you want to feel good, liberalism is awesome. If you want to do good, it is largely awful.
Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist
Pretty much nails it.
I am consistently amazed at the number of people who think that capitalism is OK, but morality isn’t. You can’t have one without the other. If there’s no morality, then stealing is OK, and the rich have the money to steal.
Bookmark.
GREAT ARTICLE! Im going to share this with as many people as I can today.
You really need to read this article.
The "liberal state has told men they don't have to support anybody"? Is he for real.
No, the liberal state has told men who go to work and attain any assets that they have to support everybody .
And if they get married and she decides to leave (75% of divorces initiated by women), they have to support her and the children too, and maybe her new boyfriend of the month.
All the while he's checking craigslist for one bedroom apartments.
Also, she has full control over whether the child their relationship creates even makes it to birth. This while he has no say either way, but must pony up support if her sole decision is to keep it.
No, they aren't all "boy-men". Many are those who took a long look at the landscape purposely stacked against them and made a rational decision to continue on with the easy single life. The one where the state isn't out to rob them around every corner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.