It will only be free to view until midnight tonight.
Thought provoking stuff here, and I will be interested to hear what ya'll think.
It is a long video, (I think it is 1 hour and 48 minutes, still watching here) but so far, worth every minute....
I remember this doctor and he was destroyed years ago. Is he back?
I often wonder what would happen if we found a cure for cancer and that perhaps someone may well have but was not permitted to publish or speak out because what then would the millions of people who work in this area do. We have some great medical and research minds and have poured zillions of dollars into research. There are blocks and blocks of buildings in the medical center complex in Houston for instance that are devoted to cancer treatment and research. Just rather mind boggling.
Bookmark
Amazing! Amazing!
Very interesting.
BMFL
Thanks!
I’ve believed for years that there is a cure for most cancers, it’s too big of a money maker in research to go public with it, or they think there would be too many people saved and the planet couldn’t support them all.
There are many many people out there willing to fleece cancer patients. Dr. Burzynski isn't a complete quack (he not only treats his patients with his miracle “cure” but he also uses cutting edge chemotherapy). Maybe he even believes his own hype. However, there are HUGE ethical problems with how he operates. You don't here about the many people he has taken for everything they are worth before they died because, well, they aren't around to complain.
If you are a cancer patient you should go look at one of the big research centers like MD Anderson or Duke. Not some guy operating out of a strip mall in Katy, TX. 1. He doesn't tell patients that if he treats them that makes them ineligible for other major medical research studies. He doesn't explain their other options, and by his actions removes these options for them. For instance, there are some very promising cancer vaccines but you can't take them if you have been treated by Dr. Burzynski. Depending on your cancer you will want to get into a phase II study with Avastin (Bevacizumab), XL184, BSI-201, dasatanib, dasatanib/erlotinib combo, tandutinib, vaccine therapy, etc. Dr. Burzynski knowingly removes these options for people.
2. He talks as if all these other cancer researchers want patients to die. “They” want to have to radiate little kids. “They” want them to have to take harmful chemo pills. I know MANY people in the field personally and professionally and they have dedicated their lives to helping people.
3. There are NO randomized studies that show his methods are effective. The patients that he has that recover are *also treated with a standard regimen*. He cherry picks the good cases to report as anecdotal evidence. He has had 30+ years to show success with randomized, research studies. I think the problem is he can't because it doesn't really work better than placebo. He has treated thousands of patients. With glioblastoma some small percentage (50 a year?) are cured. We don't know why or how. But I can make any treatment look good by random chance because of that fact.
4. His “antineoplastons” are distillates of human urine. They are just short protein / amino acid chain. He decided this was the “cure” to cancer 30 years ago and hasn't really changed his approach since then as far as I can tell. Nothing he is doing is a big secret. This conspiracy crap is absurd, there is HUGE money to be made in curing cancer and this research has been public knowledge for 30 years. If it worked we would know about it.
5. His PhD is very questionable... first of all, it really is a “D.Msc” - as far as I can tell is short for “Doctorate of Metaphysics”. I originally assumed it was “Doctorate of Medical Science”, BUT, I have found no one using “D.Msc” for that and people using it for Metaphysics. Maybe he wants us to assume that? I have no idea what school it is from. At any rate, his M.D. was in 1967. His “PhD” is from 1968 - and by his own admission he did no independent research while in Medical School. I know some M.D. / PhDs. They did 6-7 years of research *independently* from their M.D. for their PhD. I think his claiming a PdH is baloney. He claims he is singled out for persecution and that these other doctors are all in bed with the big pharmaceuticals, blah blah blah. Well, maybe if you stopped lying about your education...
6. There are some scary stuff in the published results of his patients. His treatment itself can be harmful. In one study I looked at 1.5% of patients died from elevated levels of blood sodium!?! (They “didn't follow his recommended fluid intake instructions”?)
-paridel
I can only cry for America, the demonic, money grubbing thugs have taken over every facet of the federal, and perhaps state government. Proven.
pandy, if at all possible you must see this movie. It is free until midnight tonight.
I strongly urge you to view this film and consider pinging your list, Arthur.
sfl
I've watched Dr. Burzynski for years...and watched all he has gone through. I am glad he has made this video so another generation can see how awful the FDA is. It is shocking to them.
After viewing (well worth the 1 hour 45 minutes), 2 observations:
1. How sad that some patients could receive life-saving cure years ago—in the 80s, yet not today.
2. Looks like they wanted to lock up the process and treatments with patents so no one could compete with the standard chemo and radiation.