NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS

vanity | May 26, 2011 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS FOR PRESIDENT!!

This message is intended for those posters on FR who seem to have missed my prior statements in this regard and insist on advocating for these bastards.

I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!

Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!! And I don't care how long you've been here!!

[davetex]

Dang, I missed the ZOT last night.

I always miss the ZOTS!!!

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

Amen to what you said!

[Alex Murphy]

I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!

AMEN!

[SoldierDad]

LOL - yep, just like that!

[vox_freedom]

[for-q-clinton]

Love it! Although it is fun to beat up on them.

[penelopesire]

“Nor do I withdraw from the issue. There is another way. One can be concerned and involved on the threads that address this issue and not be one of the above.”

That’s a very good point. I do find myself afraid of entering some of those threads sometimes. The reply post to me above from Clint N. Suhks is one reason why I avoid them. He/she has taken my comments completely out of context and then gone on to insinuate something sinister into what I said. I specifically said I didn’t support the homosexual agenda machine or homosexual marriage or candidates that do..how much clearer can I get....LOL?

[Clint N. Suhks]

Not sure how you took my comments to mean that I was condemning my fellow FReepers

You compared, at least some, to Fred Phelps did you not? Reread your original post. I certainly didn't pull it out of thin air. Fred Phelps is highly condemned on FR and linking any of your fellow FReepers to him is the kind of thing they look for at Media Matters to smear us.

or that I somehow ‘support’ perversion

You posted on a thread against the support of homosexuality. You revealed without being asked that you support your homosexual niece. If you are not actively helping her leave her perversion you are tacitly supporting it. It's clear you are here defending her honor. That's all I am saying.

[DJ MacWoW]

Do you think that drug laws have reduced the use of recreational drug use?

Do you think that robbery laws have reduced the number of robberies?

Do you think that rape laws have reduced the number of rapes?

Do you think that murder laws have reduced the number of murders?

Do you think that anti-porn laws have reduced porn inspired crime?

We'll never know because no one ever comes forward and says "I would have done that except it was against the law. Your questions are pat libertarian tripe. They don't work on me.

Democracy is designed for a moral people,

Democracy is mob rule. I live in a Republic.

Sharia is probably the ultimate form of government enforced morality. How's that working out?

The last guy that pulled that line was banned.

[Vendome]

Buh Bye Tard...

[Vendome]

Did you forget this    "/S"  ?

[trisham]

I agreed with Clint’s post. What did you think was incorrect about it?

[G. Odoreida]

living hell flamed out of me here on FR in 2008 when I stated both before and after that liberal sack of crap McCain got the nomination that I would never vote for the puke

I cast a write in vote for Duncan Hunter rather than voting for McC.

Just think of yourself as being on the leading edge of FR opinion.

[G. Odoreida]

Was FR strong for Bush in 2000? I don't think I can find any posts that go back that far.

The GWB administration sure turned out to be RINO central.

[G. Odoreida]

I've seen lots of posts here to the effect that not getting rid of Obama in 2012 is not an option. ANYTHING is better than permitting him to spend four more years destroying the country.

And I have seen lots of posts, especially in threads like this, insisting that we must vote third party if a RINO is nominated, regardless of whether that has the effect of reelecting Obama.

What to do, what to do.....

[BuckeyeTexan]

That is scary. It has to make God sad, don’t you think?

[bcsco]

Somebody was either overtired and not thinking right, completely clueless, or doin’ too much of the funny stuff.

I’ll take #3 for $500, Alex.

[wagglebee]

My guess is that there are other FReepers here in the same boat(with family members and/or friends who are gay). You won’t find us in threads making fun of gays or condemning them to hell like some Fred Phelps nut....

So, you are comparing conservatives who oppose the Homosexual Agenda to Fred Phelps?

Why not just compare us to the Taliban?

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[metmom]

I've seen no evidence that Libertarians want to give up morals...what do you mean?

Are you serious???

They are pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage, pro-porn; pro-prostitution, no restrictions of any kind on the above.

Those all ARE moral issues, you know.

[DJ MacWoW]

Why not just compare us to the Taliban?

Golly. You must have missed post 545