Posted on 05/25/2011 7:02:17 PM PDT by conservativegramma
Billionaire businessman Donald Trump, who staged a weeks-long public campaign questioning Barack Obama's eligibility to be president during March and April and rose to the top of the pool of potential candidates for the 2012 GOP nomination then as a result says he believes the "birth certificate" released by the White House is forged.... Trump said his period of almost-complete silence on the issue following the release by the White House on April 27 of the image of a "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii was not because he was satisfied with the document....
During their conversation, Trump told Corsi his own computer expert told him at the release that it was a computer-generated document.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
You have a tendency to be skeptical of things that prove you wrong. I just don't know what else to say. As far as I'm concerned, I've provided exactly what you asked for.
I didn't say you hadn't. But I'm asking for something more like the document in question now. Help me out.
ML/NJ
ML/NJ
Thanks for admitting that you did indeed start mocking the birthers. I give you 2 points for honesty.
Um, no. Wrong. Orly Taitz is not a FReeper.
I noticed that, but you had previously asked for an example that was "obviously not text..."
Still, I think there's something strange about these bookscans. I'm hoping you will find an example of an actual document scan for me.
I don't see any technical reason why it would be different. The reason I used books rather than something like a birth certificate is that there aren't a lot of examples of the latter on the Internet, and probably even fewer that would have been scanned using a process that would produce the kind of pixelation found on Obama's birth certificate. I'll admit that the way it was scanned is unusual for a document of that type, but I wouldn't call that evidence for fraud.
Could be. It’s not for me to say. I’m not a forensics document examiner. I do have extensive experience in printed documents, but without examining the original 1961 long-form BC in the book in the vault, I really couldn’t say.
Could be. It’s not for me to say. I’m not a forensics document examiner. I do have extensive experience in printed documents, but without examining the original 1961 long-form BC in the book in the vault, I really couldn’t say.
Oh, I know the feeling. I’ve had random threats, too. I actually have CEU (Central European University-— George $oros’s Nazi bootcamp)”monitor my blog”. I’ve had libs email death threats to me, and all kinds of other Moonbat poop.
Post the list and who it was sent from/to. I wasn't much of a birther fan in 2008, then I realized that there was some value in keeping the pressure to uncover the records (birth, school etc). At the same time I'd like to know who the all the birthers are, particularly those who might not post much but send private mails behind the scenes.
Shouldn't Obama also show us the back of his long form birth certificate so that we can judge for ourselves that something of value is or is not on the backside?
For instance, does the seal on the front-—the one I cannot see but other posters have told me it is there-—also appear on the back?
Myself, I would like to see the back of Obama’s long form birth certificate.
If anyone here has seen the back, please give me the link so that I can examine the back of Obama’s long form birth certificate for myself. Thanks.
ML/NJ
Ha! Ha! You’re right.
Of course I’m right. I’m always right. Its a curse. Imagine being my wife for thirty plus years and the bass turd is always right. Just so you know whatever I post is invariably correct with flawless reasoning in case you wanted to check. ;-)
Because you were so nice to respond here’s a secret way to achieve balance and happiness and wisdom in life: Treat every person you encounter with courtesy, respect and good humor until they respond otherwise. Even then continue to be polite as you devise your best plan to kill them if necessary. Works great. ;-)
You dumbass- I just looked at your post
You are trying to pass off COMPUTER GENERATED ASCII TEXT as ‘pixel by pixel’ duplicates
OF COURSE THEY WOULD BE YOU MORON- If you were to look at each leter here: tttt <~~~ those would all be bizel by pixel duplicates
Shut the hell up with this moronic “OCR” argument- there is NO OCR in this document and there is not reason for there to be.
You have no clue what you are talking about so shut up, stupid
They come from a scan of a document from 1952. Not only are they obviously typewritten, they predate word processing.
Whoops.
I think you just became my favorite poster. Love your sense of humor. :-)!!!
My! My! Have a conniption fit, why don’t we. Geeez. You don’t have to be so ugly to get your point across. Calm down, you might live longer.
What is weird about that blueish COLB that you posted, with the blueish lettering appearing, is the ghost font seems to be a SMALL CAPITALS font. Thats where the lowercase letters are still all capitalized only slightly smaller than the font’s Uppercase letters. It may be an indication of modern Computer Type rather than Typewriter Type.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_capitals
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.