Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Proposes Indefinite Detention Without Trial for Citizens
new american ^ | 4/18/2010 | Thomas R. Eddlem

Posted on 05/15/2011 10:15:18 AM PDT by Nachum

Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) has introduced a bill that would allow the President to imprison an unlimited number of American citizens (as well as foreigners) indefinitely without trial. Known as The Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010, or S. 3081, the bill authorizes the President to deny a detainee a trial by jury simply by designating that person an “enemy belligerent.”

The bill, which has eight cosponsors, explicitly names U.S. citizens as among those who can be detained indefinitely without trial:

An individual, including a citizen of the United States, determined to be an unprivileged enemy belligerent ... may be detained without criminal charges and without trial for the duration of hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners in which the individual has engaged, or which the individual has purposely and materially supported, consistent with the law of war and any authorization for the use of military force provided by Congress pertaining to such hostilities. [Emphasis added.]

Note that the Bush administration once said that the so-called “war on terror” would last a generation or more, and the U.S. military has officially classified many former Guantanamo detainees, such as England's Tipton Three, as having “returned to the battlefield” for merely granting an interview for the movie The Road to Guantanamo. Another five innocent Uighur (Ethnic Turkish Muslims from China) detainees had been listed as having “returned to the battlefield” after their release because their lawyer had written an op-ed protesting their prolonged detention without trial after they had been mistakenly picked up by a greedy bounty hunter. Writing an opinion or speaking an opinion against the party in power in Washington can — and already has — made some people “enemy belligerents.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 112th; chambliss; constitution; defenseact; detention; dnc4mccain; indefinite; inhofe; liberalfascism; lieberman; mccain; mccain4obama; mccainantigop; mccainantiusa; mccaintruthfile; mckeatingfive; mclamesrinoparty; ndaa; possecomitatus; proposes; rino; scottbrown; soros4mccain; traitor; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Comrades! Enjoy your new home in Siberia
1 posted on 05/15/2011 10:15:22 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What did they do to that guy in the Hanoi Hilton?


2 posted on 05/15/2011 10:17:27 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Shut up and eat your Beans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I wish McCain would just shut up and retire before he does any more damage.


3 posted on 05/15/2011 10:17:30 AM PDT by Califreak (You can't go swimming in a baseball pool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The RINO Mclaim. . . . .
I will believe anything.
4 posted on 05/15/2011 10:18:56 AM PDT by DeaconRed (It's bad when the President can't name all 57 States! ! ! ! ! ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
What did they do to that guy in the Hanoi Hilton?

Indeed

5 posted on 05/15/2011 10:19:09 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Just as a heads-up, this was introduced last year and died an early death.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-3081


6 posted on 05/15/2011 10:20:26 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
This provides massive incentive for citizens to evade arrest.
7 posted on 05/15/2011 10:21:18 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Jared Lee Loughner - Disciple of Michael Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Apparently, McCain wants to extend Constitutional protections to foreign terrorists and eliminate them for American citizens.


8 posted on 05/15/2011 10:21:18 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010

Old news. This article is over a year old.

9 posted on 05/15/2011 10:21:24 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’ve come to the conclusion that it wouldn’t have mattered who won in the last election. McCain and Obama have way too much in common.


10 posted on 05/15/2011 10:22:51 AM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Travis McGee; Jack Black
Any politician who co-sponsors and/or votes to approve this legislation is a self-declared domestic enemy of the Constitution.

R2/CW2 anyone??

11 posted on 05/15/2011 10:23:57 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

After destroying the 1st Amendment, it looks like McCain has the 4th and 5th in his sights.


12 posted on 05/15/2011 10:24:05 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (osama gets 72 virgins. We get 72 versions...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Let’s start with any Presidents, Senators or Congressman who propose or enact any laws or policies that violate their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution. And waterboard them daily, too.


13 posted on 05/15/2011 10:25:00 AM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bockscar; Arthur Wildfire! March; stockpirate; AvOrdVet; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; ...
Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) has introduced a bill that would allow the President to imprison an unlimited number of American citizens....indefinitely without trial. Known as The Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010, or S. 3081, the bill authorizes the President to deny a detainee a trial by jury simply by designating that person an “enemy belligerent.”

Just wait until Obama declares all Tea Partiers to be "enemy belligerents."

FUJM!!!

14 posted on 05/15/2011 10:25:03 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
"What did they do to that guy in the Hanoi Hilton?"

Don't fall for the phony hero crap.
Getting captured does not make one a hero. We had may heroes during the Viet Nam conflict. Mclaim was not one of them.
I know you didn't say he was a hero but some have said it.
Some of the men there with Mclaim don't think to highly of him. Since I wasn't there I can't really say, except he is no hero that much I know.

15 posted on 05/15/2011 10:25:08 AM PDT by DeaconRed (It's bad when the President can't name all 57 States! ! ! ! ! ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Mr. McKeating appears to be an "enemy belligerent."

What now?

16 posted on 05/15/2011 10:25:39 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I'm pretty belligerent when it comes to Obama. Guess I better pack my bags.
17 posted on 05/15/2011 10:26:26 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I loathe McCain and his daughter is a nut that didn’t fall any distance at all from the tree. (not an apple, a nut)


18 posted on 05/15/2011 10:26:36 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“simply by designating that person an “enemy belligerent.”

This is too much unchecked power for the president.

I can see the detention for terrorists, as the ones we captured in Afghanistan, etc., those who are in Guantanamo now — I can see a future need for “indefinite detention”, but that should be determined by some very clear criteria, by a military tribunal, or more, it most certainly should NOT be just at the decision of the president alone, or we will be in a dictatorship as soon as this becomes law, and we can all expect that “knock on the door” and indefinite detention — any criticism of the president could be defined as being “belligerent”, not as exercising our freedom of speech. Our Founding Fathers must be spinning in their grave.


19 posted on 05/15/2011 10:27:03 AM PDT by UniqueViews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

Well they sure turned his arms in to rubber seeing how far he can “reach” across the aisle.


20 posted on 05/15/2011 10:27:07 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Shut up and eat your Beans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson