Posted on 04/27/2011 6:09:26 AM PDT by DCBryan1
Edited on 04/27/2011 6:22:09 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
(CNN) The White House released President Obama’s original birth certificate Wednesday.
The surprise release follows recent and sustained remarks by businessman Donald Trump, among others, that raised doubts as to whether the president was born in the United States.
There is so much we could hit Obama with just pictures
the pic with him not having hand over heart, bowing,
vacationing while tragedies abound, the pic of him scared with the wrestlers and clinging to Michelle, the list goes on and on.
He is gay Obama
“Is it me, or does Stanley Ann’s and the Doc’s signatures look like the same person’s - just using different pens?”
Blame good American schools and the Palmer Method for that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Method
I guess you have never read the Constitution.
Most of us can walk and chew gum at the same time. Sorry you can’t.
“Why is her name listed as Stanley Ann Dunham Obama?? Were they married?”
And why is her name printed as Stanley Ann Dunham, but her “signature” is Stanley Ann Dunham Obama?
How do we find marriage records/name change records from Hawaii in 1961?
A SCANNED PDF DOES NOT HAVE CLIPPING MASKS. PERIOD.
Clipping mask information is only generated by a program like Illustrator or Photoshop and is often retained as part of the file when rendered in PDF.
That’s been my experience as well... and yet the file I downloaded has clipping masks and layers.
This must be opened in Illustrator though. It won’t work if you try in Photoshop.
BTW... I anticipate they’ll figure this out quickly and update the PDF to compress it as a single layer.
I’ve downloaded the file though and have the PDF on my system.
Lies? I note again that you don't provide specifics (e.g. names, dates, documents, etc.) I'll do it for you.
Here is what we know: Chester Arthur's father immigrated in 1818 or 1819. Arthur's "lie" (more likely an understandable mistake) was to say that he immigrated in 1814. Arthur said that his father was 33 at the time of his birth while he was actually 40.
Whether it was 1814 or the real date of 1818 or 1819 doesn't make any difference to the question of naturalization. Both periods (1814 or 1819) would offer plenty of time for a 33 year old man to become naturalized before Chester's birth in 1829. Here is a direct link to an article from 1880.
...huh?...
I know
Man this is scary I mean really really scary
“Birthers here will be so disappointed.”
Actually, I am relieved. I just wanted the evidence that every other recent President has been willing to show. His unwillingness to provide it disturbed me.
Why he took two years is anybody’s guess - but I am relieved he finally did what he should have done the first time he was asked.
Whoa! Looks like they copied it, Photoshopped it and filled in the blanks? They had the Doctor's name from other births. Can't wait for the experts that evaluated the original fake sound off on this one. . .
You missed the point. No disrespect meant. Probably my inability to articulate mine.
Thank you. A voice of reason.
It makes me cringe to know that many non-FReepers are reading these posts and laughing their butts off at some of the ignorance, delusion, and rabid conspiracy. I’m embarrassed for those who don’t have the sense to be so for themselves.
Ugh.
3 times now, when I have pressed F5 to refresh, I got timed out. The 3rd time I noticed “trying to connect to bryankeithnixon.com/?p=103.
Anyone else having trouble refreshing?
That statute was adopted as Title 8 of the US Code as currently published by the US Government reflects the laws passed by Congress as of Feb.1, 2010.
“Shouldn’t it be the other way around??”
Depends on where it was in the stack when the clerk got around to entering it in the book.
That was for me, as I have NO skills on posting pics, documents and such, even though many a FRiendly Freeper has tried to give me instructions : /
No confusion intended.
Tatt
As for moving the goal posts, the Constitution does not require that he have certain college records or whatever. While I would love to see passports and grades and etc., they would not constitutionally affect his legitimacy.
I wanted to see the Constitution followed. There were serious questions as to whether he was a natural born citizen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.