CNN via BREAKING on Drudge: White House releases Obama birth certificate

Just seems to odd, the only thing he might be embarrassed by would be it lists his mother as single. At least that’s the way it looks.

Where do you get that she is single? I see "single birth" checked (as opposed to twin or triplet). I see her maiden name in line 13 where it asks for her maiden name. But she signed with her married name.

1,161 posted on 04/27/2011 1:45:59 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)

To: MsLady; onyx

The first thing that came out of BO's mouth was comments about people thinking it was a fake!....Ever live with an alcoholic?....The guilt usually leads the drinker to bring up the abuse....If you agree with them they are angry, if you don't agree they are angry. IOW: He protests too much too soon.

Would certainly like to see a legit (not O'Really's) body expert read his body language or a professional counselor analyze him when he spoke.

1,162 posted on 04/27/2011 1:46:39 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)

I posted the stamp on Obamas 2007 document..

Compare it to the 2011 Document. LOOK CLOSELY AT Alvin Onaka’s STAMP.

“THX”

1,163 posted on 04/27/2011 1:47:51 PM PDT by RummyChick

The birth certificate that 0bama released has been posted all over this thread! You haven’t looked at it?

1,164 posted on 04/27/2011 1:48:31 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)

what does that say about the people we’re up against?
__________________

I think we have already figured that out, about 2 years ago. It also says a lot about how gullible, naive and stupid many Americans are......More interested in American Idol.

1,165 posted on 04/27/2011 1:49:05 PM PDT by mojitojoe ( 1400 years of existence & Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curry)

To: danamco; Brown Deer; JoanVarga; Gvl_M3; Nepeta; Plummz; Bikkuri; GregNH; Fantasywriter; warsaw44; ..

Check out these comments:

"If these certificates originated from the same hospital, you would think that the person who types them up would be consistent with how they were typed.

Compare each field and how the data was typed. The spacing is completely different on the two certificates. On the Nordyke BC, most of the data entry starts at the far left of each field (except for block 7), but not so on 0bama. Date of Birth shows "August" on one and "Aug." on the other.

In block 7, Honolulu is entered in the middle on one and the far right on the other. "Honolulu, Oahua" and "Honolulu, Hawaii"?

The "K" in Kansas, not the same as any other "K"s. If you look at the spacing going across the row, it looks like "Kenya," was added later.

18b. - exactly the same entry (and handwriting) on both - NO DIFFERENCE!

What's with two completely different registrars?

There is NO state seal on the 0bama BC!

1,098 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:00:29 PM by Brown Deer

0bama: - Now, normally I would not comment on something like this. . .

But abnormally he would spend millions to keep it from being published. And then he would publish it with obvious signs of insignificant tampering sprinkled with a few juicy other obscurities just to keep the merry-go-round loud and dizzying.

So, if we take away Trump's "I won" with this new revelation,

then 0bama not only wins, but he wins big. - An incurious Media will view the official document and move on because they know that John Q.P. can't concentrate long enough to sort out fact from fiction.

The Left never forgets that Truth is tedious and victory has short shelf life.

1,105 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:06:49 PM by JoanVarga

Found this in another thread:

Also, just read something from the Fox News site by a poster which is VERY interesting regarding this possible FAKE BC:

“Hate to bring this up, but I just checked the official web site for Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital and according to the information there, the name of the hospital at the time of his birth should have been Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital.

According to the web site the name didn’t change to Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital merged with Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1978.

So how could his official long form birth certificate that was generated in 1961 have the name of the hospital that wasn’t created until 1978?” [link to www.whitehouse.gov]

From WIKI: The facility was originally founded by Queen Kapiʻolani as the Kapiʻolani Maternity Home in 1890 for which she held bazaars and luaus to raise $8,000 needed to start the Home. Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital opened in 1909 named for Emma Kauikeolani Napoleon Mahelona (1862–1931), the wife of Albert Spencer Wilcox (1844–1919).[1]

In 1978, it merged with Kapiʻolani Maternity Home to become Kapiʻolani Medical Center for Women and Children. Check it Out your self at WIKI ! Gives 1978 as the Name Change Date ! [link to en.wikipedia.org]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2711389/posts?page=8#8

1,113 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:15:42 PM by Gvl_M3

Still remember

he is a British citizen

regardless he is pissing on them

and not invited tomorrow. (to the wedding.) ~ (schadenfreude)

You also forget to mention that he probably still is an Indonesian citizen as well!!!

1,121 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:20:40 PM by danamco "

Thanks, All.

1,166 posted on 04/27/2011 1:50:10 PM PDT by LucyT

To: butterdezillion

And I believe there is a federal statute which codifies when one state’s “acts and records” are to be recognized by other states in compliance with the Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause, and it specifically mentions a raised seal.

Really? I guess we will never have another President from Texas, because Texas law does not require a raised seal to certify squat. Texas Attorney General Opinion No. GA-0404

1,167 posted on 04/27/2011 1:52:54 PM PDT by Pilsner

Look at my post 1074. Look at the white photograph, not the PDF on the green security field. In the photograph, they are clearly different.

1,168 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:08 PM PDT by Mimi3

To: butterdezillion

And just how many Kapiolani BCs have you seen? What are the hard facts behind your assertion?

1,169 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:23 PM PDT by Coyotehockey

Why believe Obama? He is a deceiver.

Why believe the Big Media? Also deceivers.

Why believe the “ruling class”? Also deceivers.

Pre-election, Obama and the media created a lack of trust for voters, in part based on this issue. If things were on the up-and-up, why would he and DNC risk doing that and not just release this benign document before the election?

Post-election - same as pre-election. Obama divided when he could have united at least some elements of America.

Obama claimed to find a birth certificate in his book? Where is it and why was that one not released?

Media and Admin claimed the BC was already released - then what does this one accomplish?

They claimed its release would create an “emabarassment” - nothing embarrassing about the document released today.

Hawaii’s been all over the board on what they have and don’t have - now, suddenly, here it is.

CNN running whitewash specials on the issues lately and big media repeating before this that the matter is settled and that nothing will satisfy the “birthers”.

It was previously claimed that another doctor who died in the 1970’s delivered the usurper, now another doctor is listed.

Issues surround Obama’s given and adopted names.

Immediate questions about its authenticity, Google removing it, etc.

As time went on, who doesn’t think that IF something was eventually produced, these corrupt pricks wouldn’t forge it? And the same goes for any college, passport, law, etc. records that may be released to say “see - he is a genious and no foreign aid...”.

IMO, the last few weeks have been a setup by the ruling class and media, culminating in this worthless document.

Obama is globalist commie fraud, and he and his masters, along with the media, are doing all they can to cover it up. They are corrupt to their evil cores, and I trust NOTHING that comes from them.

I just hope the right people keep digging.

1,170 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:26 PM PDT by Yooper4Life (They all lie.)

Okay, so after listening to the news, reviewing the "Certificate" with a fine tooth comb, reading the comments about the lettering, the 'penciled in' marks, the 'lifted signatures', and now all the stuff on layering - are we worse off than before he released it? i.e., is there even more reason to doubt, etc.

Advice to Obama: Send your servant along with two witnesses, (I would recommend two freshman congressman) over to Hawaii and each take three separate digital photos (with 3 different cameras) of the damned original Long Form Birth Certificate - If it's not there and this is what is, then take a digital photo of it and put it on your WH site. We're all sick of this and, well, don't get me started. . .

1,171 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:32 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)

To: Coyotehockey

I don’t understand how ORIGINAL documents from 1961 (for Zero, OR the Nordyke twins), could contain the name of a hospital that did not even exist yet

1,172 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:32 PM PDT by EyeGuy (ueers)

To: ReignOfError

“It was copied onto security paper.”

Possibly, but the digital artifacts just don’t look like it was printed on security paper and then the entire thing was scanned like that. Also, if you look at some of the other news stories (Sun Times, Christian Science Monitor), there is another copy of this same document that was apparently handed out by the White House to the press, that is on plain white paper background, with no evidence of the security paper background. Now, when you photocopy security paper to plain paper, it will not copy an exact facsimile of the security paper, but there will be obvious evidence that the original was on security paper. These copies appear to be copies of an original on plain white paper.

1,173 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:43 PM PDT by Boogieman

More likely its an artifact of the copy process.

Are you joking? How so?

1,174 posted on 04/27/2011 1:56:17 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)

Without a detailed history of the hospital, how do you know that you have all the facts?

1,175 posted on 04/27/2011 1:57:02 PM PDT by Coyotehockey

Oh C'mon #2 - AP Is Involved?

The AP has also released a "different version" of the document the White House released.

Guys, this is too freaking blatant.

Incidentally, the AP's version was flattened before being PDF'd. Too bad they forgot to do that on the *****house, er, Whitehouse copy.

Heh AP - betcha you won't look at this!

Here's the AP's document snippet on the accepted date:

And now let's have the Whitehouse version:

Look closely at the date stamp. They're not aligned at the top. The error is small, but it's there. Also note the saturation problems in the Whitehouse version in the word "Date" and the fill on the "A".

The mystery deepens, but the evidence is even more damning than it was before: This "document" was tampered with.

1,176 posted on 04/27/2011 1:58:11 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)

To: Republican Extremist

“Zoom in at 800% on the font of #20 and tell me it was done with a stamp.”

It was done with a stamp.

1,177 posted on 04/27/2011 1:59:00 PM PDT by Boogieman

It did exist. I have posted info from Toru Nishigaya . he was assistant chief of staff there in the 50s. He is the Dr that was helping Ann in Lolo’s case.

He wrote an article in the 50s. That hospital name was listed.

The article has disappeared

55/04000/Obstetrics_in_Hawaii__Report_on_seven_years_.27.pdf

1,178 posted on 04/27/2011 1:59:30 PM PDT by RummyChick

The images we can see there are probably generated by an MRC-compression algorithm, I would say.

1,179 posted on 04/27/2011 1:59:49 PM PDT by cartan

1,180 posted on 04/27/2011 2:00:21 PM PDT by RummyChick

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794