Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Calls in to CNN

Posted on 04/21/2011 6:03:25 AM PDT by wilco200

Anyone see/hear Trump call in to CNN this AM?

Spectacular. There was a guest on trashing Trump's finances. Trump calls in and proceeds to dismantle the guy. Then of course, the hosts start asking about Obama's birth. Again, Trump hammers them for continuing to ask the question...and unlike Bachmann (sorry michelle) never backs down. If nothing else this guy is refreshing and I hope stays in the race through the primaries.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allegedlyamerican; allegedlyhawaiian; birthcertificate; certificate; certifigate; cnn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamabirthplace; obamacolb; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: wilco200
Right or wrong Trump is acting like nothing more than a typical American who is questioning ALL the SILLY $HIT going on under this administration.

More POWER to him and his questioning.

61 posted on 04/21/2011 8:03:32 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia

Hey wizbang... We know you don’t like Palin. So who are you supporting, and who has a “chance?”


62 posted on 04/21/2011 8:09:05 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

Trump is saying what needs to be said—I would like to see him in the debates—he has the leadership we need at this moment. Lets see what his men found in Hawaii.


63 posted on 04/21/2011 8:22:48 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“The BC issue is big and finally, someone like Trump recognizes and uses it. It will force the other Rep candidates to address the issue publicly, something they don’t want to do.” ~ kabar

Really? Trump says below what he thinks is MOST important. Of course that echos what I said in my previous post and what Rush said yesterday (see the transcript I posted on that upthread):

VIDEO at link:

Donald Trump: I’ve Said My Piece On Obama’s Birth Certificate
Evan McMorris-Santoro | April 21, 2011, 9:52AM
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/donald-trump-ive-said-my-piece-on-obamas-birth.php

“..In an op-ed published in USA Today on Thursday morning, Trump writes that he’s ready to stop all the birther chatter.

“I have spoken my piece on this issue,” Trump wrote, reminding readers that “many people have the same doubts as I have.”

Trump says he’s ready to shift the conversation about his maybe-candidacy to something more substantive.

“My concern lies with people like the single mom who recently wrote to me that she now works a third job to pay for the gas to get to the other two,” Trump writes.

Trump appears to be interested in shifting the conversation to core issues beyond Obama’s birth certificate — which Trump has questioned to great fame and polling fortune over the past month. From the op-ed:
There are many important and pressing issues that, should I elect to run, I will address — including China, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, the price of fuel, unfair trade, unsustainable debt, the creation of jobs and the rising price of food.

Trump says he never wanted to talk about the birth certificate as much as he has. It’s the media’s fault that the issue has become so central to talk of his potential campaign, he writes.

“Sadly, the press has en masse chosen to glom onto but one of the myriad issues I have discussed and would tackle as president,” he writes.

Trump, of course, kicked off his birther fever back at CPAC in February, when he raised the issue in his surprise speech there. Then, in a string of subsequent interviews, he not only expressed his skepticism about the president’s citizenship but promised to reveal the secrets of Obama’s birth before the summer thanks to a special investigation he claims to have been running in Hawaii, but won’t discuss and details of.

Just this morning in fact — as his USA Today op-ed was hitting the carpet outside hotel room doors everywhere — Trump told CNN that “at a certain point in time I’ll be revealing some interesting things” about Obama’s birth, while also claiming that he’s winning in the polls “is because I’ll protect this country from China and OPEC and all the others that are ripping us off.”

Watch:

It’s worth noting that coverage of Trump has shifted recently to talk of his newfound conservative political stances. That has not gone entirely well for Trump, though he seems interested in moving the conversation about him away from birtherism anyway.


64 posted on 04/21/2011 8:23:15 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Freedom's Just Another Word For Nothing Left to Tax " ~ Gagdad Bob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
Is Trump electable? NO. But I think he is really a stalking horse for Hillary Clinton.

A good point. We must not forget that anything that happens on the national political scene will have Clinton fingerprints on it.

Trump is delivering body-blows to Obama, and shaking-up the media for a reason. If they (the media) had been doing their job, we wouldn't have Obama in the White House in the first place. "You're Fired" is something many in the media should be hearing, but aren't.

However, it takes more than that to make a conservative and while appealing, could be a mistake to pursue too far. Christy in NJ smacked-down a union teacher who complained about her $80K salary and benefits to find himself the sudden favorite among some conservatives yet, a closer look provided evidence that liberalism lay just beneath the surface.

While it is refreshing to see someone go after Obama in a way others haven't (for fear of being labeled racist) could it be his 'celebrity' offers him immunity and if so, how long will it last?

65 posted on 04/21/2011 8:25:05 AM PDT by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia
I would happy why Palin/Bachman are unbeatable if that were my opinion.

Perhaps you dreamed where I stated that?

66 posted on 04/21/2011 8:44:03 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]



Tough Dog Says "Donate"


Click the Pic

67 posted on 04/21/2011 8:48:50 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Durus

Appreciate the opportunity to clarify: I think that although it’s early in the game and understand that much can change before the campaign begins in earnest, and as much as I am solidly behind the conservative positions of both Palin and Bachmann (whew — that’s a lot of “disclaimers”), as of now I don’t think either has the solid support of “independents” and “moderates” throughout America to be elected president. With both on the ticket (as president and vp), I think the chances for conservative victory in the national election are even less.


68 posted on 04/21/2011 8:51:35 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Actually, I adore Sarah and her entire family. I would be quite happy if she were to become my president. Just don’t think if could happen even in my wildest dreams.


69 posted on 04/21/2011 8:54:24 AM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Durus; Mr. K

I guess I did dream it. LOL Sorry

It was Mr. K who actually said they were unbeatable.


70 posted on 04/21/2011 9:00:09 AM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
Are we sure that the support of “independents” and “moderates” are required to win? Reagan was a polarizing figure (or at least the press made him out to be an extremist) and he won handily.
71 posted on 04/21/2011 9:55:03 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Durus

I agree it’s possible, especially if BO wins the Democrat Party nomination (not a sure thing, but likely), the economy remains in the toilet (particularly if food and gasoline prices continue to explode) and a third-party candidate doesn’t split the vote ... it sure is possible and would be a great victory for conservatives and traditional American values.


72 posted on 04/21/2011 10:11:27 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I love Sarah, but I am afraid she would not win the Primary.
I also don’t think she is going to run anyway. She knows she is most effective campaigning for others now, and bet she is hoping for a position like Sec. of Energy! That would be right up her ally! Another great position would be Press Secretary! She would certainly drive the liberal media nuts every day and that would be a joy to see! :)


73 posted on 04/21/2011 10:27:09 AM PDT by seekthetruth (My Dream Ticket For 2012: Allen West / Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

That is one of the reasons Trump scares me so much. If he runs 3rd party it will be Perot redux. I don’t understand why he gets the support of conservatives.


74 posted on 04/21/2011 10:28:31 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Do you have a reading comprehension problem? My initial response was to Rush's comment below. I said that Rush was incorrrect by stating that the mainstream conservative base is not concerned about Obama's BC. We are and it has to do with the Constitution.

RUSH: The mainstream conservative base is not concerned with where Obama’s birth certificate is. We’re concerned with his economics, his destroying the economy.

The reason why Trump wants to move beyond, as you describe it, "birtherism," is that the MSM, not surprisingly, is trying to make him a one-issue candidate and something of a nut. Trump is standing his ground on the BC issue, unlike Bachmann who folded like a cheap suit when Stephy started waving around the internet version of the COLB.

Unlike the rest of the GOP namby-pambys, Trump refuses to allow the MSM to define him. He is not backing down from his demand that Obama produce his long form BC and the other personal attacks he has made on Obama. The idea that he must now be a one-not Johnny on the issue is something the MSM would embrace so they can marginalize him. And Trump has achieved his objective of getting on the GOP radar screen as a candidate and his poll numbers have sent shock waves thru the GOP establishment. I believe that is all to the good and hope he enters the race to force the other candidates to reveal themselves on issues of concern to GOP voters.

75 posted on 04/21/2011 10:53:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: kabar
The Constitution matters. This

Yeah right. The birther "constitutionalists" were remarkably silent when Bush unconstituionally launched UNDECLARED wars against Afghanistan and iraq. They are also silent when Bush called for suspension of constitutional right of habeas corpus of an American citizen. They were also silent when The Donald, and others, attacked the constituional free speech rights of Americans who wanted to build a mosque.

76 posted on 04/21/2011 11:02:28 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All

http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/21/trump-calls-into-cnn/


77 posted on 04/21/2011 11:59:19 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather ("Kick The Communists Out Of Your Govt. And Don't Accept Their Goodies"-Yuri Bezmenov-KGB Defector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Outstanding....


78 posted on 04/21/2011 12:22:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Beam me up, Scottie. The last "declared" war we had was WWII. Congress approved our entry into Iraq and Afghanistan.

Text of Joint Resolution On Iraq Passed By The United States Congress--The following resolution was passed 296-133 by the House of Representatives and 77-23 by the Senate on October 10 and 11, 2002: Joint Resolution to Authorize the use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.

Building a mosque on or near Ground Zero was a recognized right by virtually everyone. The issue was one of appropriateness, not rights.

79 posted on 04/21/2011 3:53:38 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Trump bump...

I won’t vote for anyone who ran for president last time...

I might vote for someone who ran for vice president...

We’ll see how it shakes out.

I left the Republican party when they nominated McCain.


80 posted on 04/21/2011 3:59:04 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson