TRANSLATION:
“We love your war. We love your czars.
We love your Obamacare. We love your usurping our jobs.
We don't care you have less documentation than a mattress.
Am I crying enough?”
Posted on 03/23/2011 1:59:38 PM PDT by kristinn
March 23, 2011
President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 2011, outlining your Administration’s actions regarding Libya and Operation Odyssey Dawn. The United States has long stood with those who seek freedom from oppression through self-government and an underlying structure of basic human rights. The news yesterday that a U.S. fighter jet involved in this operation crashed is a reminder of the high stakes of any military action abroad and the high price our Nation has paid in blood and treasure to advance the cause of freedom through our history.
I respect your authority as Commander-in-Chief and support our troops as they carry out their mission. But I and many other members of the House of Representatives are troubled that U.S. military resources were committed to war without clearly defining for the American people, the Congress, and our troops what the mission in Libya is and what America’s role is in achieving that mission. In fact, the limited, sometimes contradictory, case made to the American people by members of your Administration has left some fundamental questions about our engagement unanswered. At the same time, by contrast, it appears your Administration has consulted extensively on these same matters with foreign entities such as the United Nations and the Arab League.
It is my hope that you will provide the American people and Congress a clear and robust assessment of the scope, objective, and purpose of our mission in Libya and how it will be achieved. Here are some of the questions I believe must be answered:
A United Nations Security Council resolution does not substitute for a U.S. political and military strategy. You have stated that Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi must go, consistent with U.S. policy goals. But the U.N. resolution the U.S. helped develop and signed onto makes clear that regime change is not part of this mission. In light of this contradiction, is it an acceptable outcome for Qadhafi to remain in power after the military effort concludes in Libya? If not, how will he be removed from power? Why would the U.S. commit American resources to enforcing a U.N. resolution that is inconsistent with our stated policy goals and national interests?
In announcing that our Armed Forces would lead the preliminary strikes in Libya, you said it was necessary to “enable the enforcement of a no-fly zone that will be led by our international partners.” Do we know which partners will be taking the lead? Are there clear lines of authority and responsibility and a chain of command? Operationally, does enforcement of a no-fly zone require U.S. forces to attack non-air or command and control operations for land-based battlefield activities, such as armored vehicles, tanks, and combatants?
You have said that the support of the international community was critical to your decision to strike Libya. But, like many Americans, it appears many of our coalition partners are themselves unclear on the policy goals of this mission. If the coalition dissolves or partners continue to disengage, will the American military take on an increased role? Will we disengage?
Since the stated U.S. policy goal is removing Qadhafi from power, do you have an engagement strategy for the opposition forces? If the strife in Libya becomes a protracted conflict, what are your Administration's objectives for engaging with opposition forces, and what standards must a new regime meet to be recognized by our government?
Your Administration has repeatedly said our engagement in this military action will be a matter of “days, not weeks.” After four days of U.S. military action, how soon do you expect to hand control to these other nations? After the transition to coalition forces is completed, how long will American military forces remain engaged in this action? If Qadhafi remains in power, how long will a no-fly zone will be enforced?
We are currently in the process of setting priorities for the coming year in the budget. Has the Department of Defense estimated the total cost, direct and indirect, associated with this mission? While you said yesterday that the cost of this mission could be paid for out of already-appropriated funds, do you anticipate requesting any supplemental funds from Congress to pay for ongoing operations in Libya?
Because of the conflicting messages from the Administration and our coalition partners, there is a lack of clarity over the objectives of this mission, what our national security interests are, and how it fits into our overarching policy for the Middle East. The American people deserve answers to these questions. And all of these concerns point to a fundamental question: what is your benchmark for success in Libya?
The American people take the use of military action seriously, as does the House of Representatives. It is regrettable that no opportunity was afforded to consult with Congressional leaders, as was the custom of your predecessors, before your decision as Commander-in-Chief to deploy into combat the men and women of our Armed Forces. Understanding some information required to respond may be classified, I look forward to a complete response.
Sincerely,
John A. Boehner
The only thing this letter should have said is the time and date of the Impeachment Hearing.
I wonder if he left a forwarding address for Brazil at the post office?
BUMP.
Cry baby needs to grow a set,or let Bachmann take over,Enough of this patty cake with the Filthy Communist trying to destroy this country and the POS Socialists in the House!
Obie is a dictator.
Yes, he also could have thrown in something about the cost and how this money could be better spent putting more agencies in the department of education to check into whether the teachers are stalking kids on facebook or something really important on the national scene.
I’m sure some liberals will go ballistic at the fact that this letter was sent. How dare anyone question the dear leader on his decisions.
We’re just a few days into this, but it has quagmire written all over it. We’re supposed to enforce a no fly zone, and hopefully stop the fighting. But, all this can happen and also leave Qadafi in power. But if our policy is that Qadafi should go, where does that leave us?
I don’t think Obama and his boys thought this action through.
Milquetoasts like Boehner send letters regarding their concerns while the left plays political hardball.
Until we get rid of the RINO idiots we are lost. They do not understand that, just like the left enabling the Muslims, they will be wiped out if the left gets to take over.
I think it’s a pretty good letter. The questions are quite specific and Boehner makes it clear that he expects a response. I doubt that he’ll get one, of course, so we’ll see what he does then.
Not if we leave it to airstrikes and missile attacks. If we put troops on the ground. Then its a quagmire.
...a couple of F-16 pilots were on the ground recently... does that count?
;) nudge, nudge...
Totally agree. That letter is too mealy-mouthed and wimpy. Its way past time someone has the cajones to tell this admin whats what. They dont respect us, we are not obligated to respect them back.
This look like a note from the minority party leader!
Since when is following the Constitution merely a custom?
I agree. First you write a public statement. Then, when there is nothing forthcoming, you defund the whole endeavor with a statement about the separation of powers and the duties of the Executive branch.
Did B-boy just write this today? This should have come out Monday evening.
I have no use for Boehner. He is a wimp. I was floored with the crybaby stuff. How can you take a man seriously when he acts like a girl?
Most of the rest of the Replublicans are no better. Unlike the Democrats they do not understand that this is a closed fist war for the country. They should be all over Obama. Heck, the Democrats that are calling for impeachment at least have some stones. The Republicans are all totally gay.
“I think it’s a pretty good letter. The questions are quite specific and Boehner makes it clear that he expects a response. I doubt that he’ll get one, of course, so we’ll see what he does then.”
This Pathetic guy was the wrong choice,These are critical times and he does not have the intestinal fortitude for the job!
I agree with you. The letter should have addressed the fact that Obama violated his oath to support and defend the Constitution by failing to follow the War Powers Act provision of 1973. Unless the US was under attack or imminent threat he is required to consult with the US Congress before committing military forces to hostile actions.
TRANSLATION:
“We love your war. We love your czars.
We love your Obamacare. We love your usurping our jobs.
We don't care you have less documentation than a mattress.
Am I crying enough?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.