Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Redefine marriage, encourage polygamy
On Line Opinion ^ | 25 February, 2011 | Ben-Peter Terpstra

Posted on 02/24/2011 2:39:20 PM PST by AustralianConservative

Redefine marriage and you'll encourage polygamist agendas. At least that's the view of the Australian Christian Lobby (ACL), and one I share.

According to the ACL, "It's important that the definition of marriage remains the union of a man and a woman" not two men or two women – and certainly not four women and one man.

Also, "It's important that marriage is not watered down to include polygamy, such as is being debated in Canada."

The uncomfortable truth: In Canada, where marriage was redefined, Muslim fundamentalists and scripture-twisting cults want their versions of "equality" too.

Consider:

Canadian multiculturalists are pushing polygamy.

It didn't take long. On July 20, 2005, Canada adopted a politically-correct and therefore divisive "gender-neutral" marriage definition. Today, polygamy is a contentious issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at onlineopinion.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bestiality; childmolestation; christian; feminist; homonaziagenda; homonazism; homosexualagenda; incest; marriage; pederasty; pedophilia; polyamory; polygamy; polygyny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=11667
1 posted on 02/24/2011 2:39:25 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

You know, 4 women and 1 man wouldn’t be all that bad - for a little while. :>)

Seriously, it won’t be only polygamy that comes into play; you’ll also have those deviants who will plead discrimination when you don’t let them “marry” their goat, sheep, etc.

This particular law is a very slippery slope, as is the concept of the head of the Executive Branch, who is charged with enforcing the laws passed by Congress, deciding not to defend such laws in court.


2 posted on 02/24/2011 2:48:02 PM PST by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

Pfff. The polygamists are amateur hour. The pedophiles are the ones who are going to want ‘equality’ next.


3 posted on 02/24/2011 2:49:03 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Might as well marry your grandkids to avoid all the messy asset transfers.


4 posted on 02/24/2011 2:51:34 PM PST by Slicksadick (Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

The only way for us to fight this and stand a chance on winning is to demand that all restriction be removed from civil marriage and placed before a public vote.

Go on the offensive, stop defending and throw their talking points back at them.

When they balk, as they have whenever I mention allowing sibling, multiple or even incestuous marriage between consenting adults, throw their talking points of discrimination back at them.

Risky and bold, but so far, it has been same-sex marriage supporters aghast at such a proposal.

Kind of knocks some sense in their heads too. They don’t know how to deal with their own rhetoric coming back at them.


5 posted on 02/24/2011 2:54:42 PM PST by DakotaRed (Why not just pass a law requiring criminals to obey the laws?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

If people really want to remember what happens when one part of the US turns against another part, watch the movie God and Generals. If you can’t find it, google it and buy it. It’s only about $8.00. Watch it a couple of times and see what happens when people get really pissed. During that time, our country lost around 500,000 soldiers. The next time around it will be in the millions. I’m afraid that people are going to push us to far one of these days and it won’t be pretty.


6 posted on 02/24/2011 2:54:58 PM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

Isn’t it interesting that Caesar Claudius outlawed marriage also....orgies, bacchanals—oh, so much fun. No one takes care of the children....whose children???? Who cares. Children can be sacrifices to the gods....oh, yes, our “society” already does that and glorifies all sorts of perverted and immoral relationships.....Why? Do they work for the Marxists who want to destroy the family (so the children become their useful idiots with government “guidance”?)

All to create unrest, jealousy, narcissism, and chaos to bring about Soros’ New World Order.


7 posted on 02/24/2011 2:56:34 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

You animal, you. Four women in one house would be a disaster. They’d be fighting over your body all night and you wouldn’t get any sleep (lol).

Seriously, you’re right it opens up the door to other strange relations and children are always the suffering guinea pigs. That’s what concerns me.


8 posted on 02/24/2011 3:04:47 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Yuck – I don’t want to think about it. Time for a cold shower. Point taken, however.


9 posted on 02/24/2011 3:06:19 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

I agree going on the offensive is important.


10 posted on 02/24/2011 3:09:18 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Great point – because how quickly some forget the horrors of Rome. The empire fell for a reason and that played a big role.


11 posted on 02/24/2011 3:11:17 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

That is exactly why none of the children are taught true history. Dewey changed the system to one of indoctrination and Hegelian dialectics to change moral values...from Christianity to pagan ones. We see the shambles of the children not having any coherent thoughts in their heads and not making right and wrong decisions....they redefine “good” as some demeaning sexual acts....it is a bizarre scenario but intentional........just a lot useless tidbits spouted in schools about nothing.....movies...movie stars.....people who model dysfunctional behavior are their heroes....just dysfunctional society we are becoming..


12 posted on 02/24/2011 3:54:45 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

“Four women in one house would be a disaster.”

I did say that it’d be OK for a little while - like a couple of hours, tops. After that one risks death by either heart failure or inhalation of too much cat hair from all of the cat fights.


13 posted on 02/24/2011 4:05:17 PM PST by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

We have insidious people who want to destroy the family so they can redesign the male and female—take it off of Natural Law Theory and God’s Laws and totally destroy the Founding Documents. It is to destroy not only Christianity, but particularly America. We have become so unconstitutional under justices like Holmes who have removed our legal system from moral laws. It is what the founders based our legal system on....Natural Law Theory presupposed a Creator and only laws are legal which uphold Natural Law.

The intent of The Founders was to NEVER deviate from Natural Law Theory—they said it NEVER evolved (human nature), therefore, all just law had to be based on it.

Man-made law which deviates from Natural Law Theory is unjust. Man-made law (Positivism) is political and, as such, it forces unequal justice—it is designed to favor one group over the other or give undue power to certain groups or entities....never can be constitutional.

That is what we have to fix....our Legal System has got to get back to the Founding principles and we would have Just Law based on logic and reason as it was in the beginning. All this other nonsense would be non-existent.

Marxists think human nature “evolves’ and the Constitution needs to “evolve”. That is the big lie and we have allowed Marxists to twist our legal system into some hideous system of favoritism.

Homosexual unions are sexists and exclusive of half of the human race. It does not unit the society in the way that nature designed. It doesn’t include the whole of human race and it denies children their biological parents which is their natural right. We can never have laws which discourage a society from fulfilling the natural rights of their citizens.


14 posted on 02/24/2011 4:48:36 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

True, you did say it would be a short term thing. But a couple of hours? One woman every 30 minutes, my guess? You’re a viril man.


15 posted on 02/24/2011 8:48:29 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

It’s funny how Dewey’s name keeps on popping up – I need to read up on him more. Sounds like a real trickster.


16 posted on 02/24/2011 8:50:42 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

It is funny that you mention that because I just finished listening to this.....he mentions Dewey in the beginning....it is disgusting...

http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-tube/video.php?videoid=4362

I basically have read the Underground History of American Education by Gato and the Cloning of the American Mind....by Eakman which really goes into the psychology and philosophy injected into the methodologies. The Closing of the American mind explains Postmodernism and its effect. Very interesting and it will scare the hell out of you if you have children or grandchildren in the public school system.


17 posted on 02/24/2011 9:36:08 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative
Four women in one house would be a disaster.

Tell me about it...

I was kidnapped by a busload of high school cheerleaders. It was horrible... The things they made me do...

18 posted on 02/25/2011 1:15:16 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Thanks for the laugh.


19 posted on 02/25/2011 1:52:50 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Thank you for the link – much appreciated.


20 posted on 02/25/2011 1:54:02 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson