You know, 4 women and 1 man wouldn’t be all that bad - for a little while. :>)
Seriously, it won’t be only polygamy that comes into play; you’ll also have those deviants who will plead discrimination when you don’t let them “marry” their goat, sheep, etc.
This particular law is a very slippery slope, as is the concept of the head of the Executive Branch, who is charged with enforcing the laws passed by Congress, deciding not to defend such laws in court.
Pfff. The polygamists are amateur hour. The pedophiles are the ones who are going to want ‘equality’ next.
The only way for us to fight this and stand a chance on winning is to demand that all restriction be removed from civil marriage and placed before a public vote.
Go on the offensive, stop defending and throw their talking points back at them.
When they balk, as they have whenever I mention allowing sibling, multiple or even incestuous marriage between consenting adults, throw their talking points of discrimination back at them.
Risky and bold, but so far, it has been same-sex marriage supporters aghast at such a proposal.
Kind of knocks some sense in their heads too. They don’t know how to deal with their own rhetoric coming back at them.
Isn’t it interesting that Caesar Claudius outlawed marriage also....orgies, bacchanals—oh, so much fun. No one takes care of the children....whose children???? Who cares. Children can be sacrifices to the gods....oh, yes, our “society” already does that and glorifies all sorts of perverted and immoral relationships.....Why? Do they work for the Marxists who want to destroy the family (so the children become their useful idiots with government “guidance”?)
All to create unrest, jealousy, narcissism, and chaos to bring about Soros’ New World Order.