Posted on 02/01/2011 7:36:06 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
Romney has been running for president since he was a sperm.
He is completely without moral compass or guiding principles, except to do anything, say anything, pay anything to get elected president.
He can’t find any ‘runaway’ poll numbers.
Until some actually announce, the polling will stay similar: Top tier — Romney, Palin, Huckabee, Gingrich.
Once they actually start announcing, then the factions will show who the ‘real’ leaders are.
==
Remember that McCain was running 2nd and 3rd during the early primaries in 2008. Too bad he didn’t drop out early.
I hope he runs in order to enlarge and dilute the pool of voodoo Republican empty suits.
Oh he’s going to be on CNN tonight explaining why he is so special.
Huntsman thinks the guy is a flake and I agree.
FUMR
Well said! Think how dangerous he would be as a Democrat though.
Let me lend a hand.
Go away, Mitt.
We don’t want you nor do we need you.
Doesn't regret RomneyCare!
Even Brett farce knows when enough is enough.
RUN! Don't run.
RUN! Don't run.
RUN! Don't run.
If he pretends it never happened, I won't.
What you said.
The -last- thing I want is a RINO “McCain Lite”.
The most efficient way the GOP can hand a second term to Obama is to pick someone other than Palin for the GOP candidate.
"I'm not running as the Republican view or a continuation of Republican values.
That's not what brings me to the race.
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldnt make any sense at all.""
-- President Ronald Reagan
"I'm very clear I think, to the people across the Commonwealth
my "R" didn't stand so much for Republican as it does for reform."
(Romney Video, accessed 9/19/07)
"A political party cannot be all things to all people.
It must represent certain fundamental beliefs
which must not be compromised to political expediency
or simply to swell its numbers."
-- President Ronald Reagan
*ping*
I’d actually have a lot of respect for him if he was man enough to say that Romney care was a mistake, that he learned from that mistake and that he promises to make up for it by opposing all attempts at socialized medicine in the future.
I’m not holding my breath, however.
Favre had to have it beaten into him. I suspect Romney may be of the same mindset.
I've said it before and I'll say it again -- I believe that Romney is the only serious GOP contender that would be unable to beat Obama, because Romney's negatives defuse any arguments against Obama, e.g., government heath-care insurance takeover, corporate bailouts, etc.
Where’s Romney on support of the TEA Party?
Where’s Romney on fighting against Obamacare?
Where’s Romney on anything that is affecting the country right now?
He’s invisible. He’s Capt. Neutral-ground. He’s a reach across the aisle and get screwed again type. He’s jello. He’s politically androgenous.
He’s got to go back to whatever the heck he does with his days.
Here is the link where Romney defends his idiocy.
R’Care has the same results as O’Care and thats to enslave its citizens and make them property of the state.
All I know is I’m nobodies property.
Mitt can go screw himself. I will never vote the the weasel ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.