Skip to comments.
Second graders perform oral sex in class, and somewhere, Planned Parenthood rejoices
LifeSiteNews ^
| 1/21/11
| Kathleen Gilbert
Posted on 01/21/2011 11:35:44 AM PST by wagglebee
Here is a story on Drudge today that, while truly shocking, is a little less so for coming out of San Francisco:
A teacher at Oaklands Markham Elementary School has been suspended indefinitely after school officials said a pair of second-graders performed sex acts on each other in class
.
In one case, several students apparently took off their clothes and were naked in the classroom. In the second incident, a boy and girl reportedly engaged in oral sex in front of their classmates.
[District spokesman Troy] Flint indicated that the suspended teacher, whose name was not released by the school district, was present for both of the incidents. (CBS San Francisco)
Planned Parenthood, the nations abortion giant and most trusted provider of reproductive health care doesnt have anything to do with this particular story. But I imagine that, when they read about these youngsters, Planned Parenthood executives are wiping away a little tear of pride anyway. After all, the billion-dollar organization makes no effort to hide the fact that it tells parents to encourage children to sexually stimulate themselves from birth.
PP says that children need to know by the age of five that its normal to touch ones sex organs for pleasure and to seek privacy when doing so. By age seven, children are to know that people experience sexual pleasure in a number of different ways and that entertaining sexual thoughts and fantasies is normal.
According to their own website, these second-graders were right on target in PPs sex ed program, except for the privacy part. Theyre just kids, after all, sometimes they forget the finer points.
The school didnt answer calls inquiring about what sort of age-appropriate sex education these kids had been exposed to, but I sure would like to know.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: education; moralabsolutes; obama; palin; plannedparenthood; publicschools; sexpositiveagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
According to their own website, these second-graders were right on target in PPs sex ed program, except for the privacy part. Exactly, this is the results of decades of immorality in the education system.
1
posted on
01/21/2011 11:35:49 AM PST
by
wagglebee
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
2
posted on
01/21/2011 11:36:44 AM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
If the teacher were a pastor or a priest would the papers be so discriminate in leaving him unnamed?
3
posted on
01/21/2011 11:39:30 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We deserve the government we allow.)
To: wagglebee
Not to worry. Obama's "Safe School Czar" is on the job!
Obama's "Safe School Czar" Kevin
"use a condom" Jennings
__________________________________________________________
From the Washington Times...
EDITORIAL: At the president's pleasure
'Safe school czar' encouraged child sex with an older man
September 28, 2009
A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar". It's getting hard to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down.
In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship.
According to Mr. Jennings' own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the "older man" in a "bus station bathroom" and was taken to the older man's home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape "unethical." Mr. Jennings' defenders asserted that there was no evidence that he was aware the student had sex with the older man.
However, the new audiotape contradicts this claim. In 2000, Mr. Jennings gave a talk to the Iowa chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, an advocacy group that promotes homosexuality in schools. On the tape, Mr. Jennings recollected that he told the student to make sure "to use a condom" when he was with the older man. That he actively encouraged the relationship is reinforced by Mr. Jennings' own description in his 1994 book, "One Teacher in 10." In that account, the teacher boasts how he allayed the student's concerns about the relationship to such a degree that the 15-year-old "left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated."
Mr. Jennings' denials about these events reveal a lack of remorse. He has not admitted that he made mistakes in this case, and he now refuses to answer any questions about the scandal. Don't forget, this is a presidential appointee we're talking about. Mr. Obama should make clear what his standards are for public servants serving at the pleasure of the president. Encouraging and covering up man-boy sexual activity are serious offenses. The White House should force Mr. Jennings to come clean.
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/at-the-presidents-pleasure/
__________________________________________________________
4
posted on
01/21/2011 11:44:51 AM PST
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: wagglebee
From the very beginning of people’s existence onwards past today, how many similar incidents have been going on, in schools worldwide, but the teachers have never been caught?
5
posted on
01/21/2011 11:45:03 AM PST
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: AD from SpringBay
wrote in 1963 and they’re still doing their rules and lets not forget skins by MTV
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
rule 24 and 25
If you look at their rules then they even use the same words as they do today.
What is scary is that they have almost completed all their rules and as for the FBI,. well they don’t need to dismantle it as they have just infiltrated them.
Ah how Alinsky,, Marx must be so proud of their prodigy obama and how proud are they of taking over the Dem party and then have voters which are too dumb to understand what is going on.
6
posted on
01/21/2011 11:46:03 AM PST
by
manc
(Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
To: wagglebee
I've seen a few threads about this today, but very few comments regarding the well-being of the victims.
Let us keep the kids who have been victimized by whomever in our thoughts and prayers.
7
posted on
01/21/2011 11:48:48 AM PST
by
GSWarrior
(Businessmen are more trustworthy than preachers, professors and politicians.)
To: wagglebee
This must be Nancy’s district so its ok as everybody is so gay and happy here.
8
posted on
01/21/2011 11:50:41 AM PST
by
ncfool
(The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
To: wagglebee
This is the kind of stuff advocated by the “Safe Schools Czar”
I think it calls for bullets
9
posted on
01/21/2011 11:51:06 AM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
To: wagglebee
These kids have been exposed to things my generation never heard about until puberty. It’s going to get worse, all the way to the bottom.
10
posted on
01/21/2011 11:52:21 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: wagglebee
The school should be closed down until a complete investigation is done. This will eat at their financing and maybe make them think about what they are doing. Parents need to sue the school for all they can get. Hit their pocket books hard.
11
posted on
01/21/2011 11:54:03 AM PST
by
RC2
To: wagglebee
the suspended teacher, whose name was not released by the school district, was present for both of the incidents Not arrested for pedophilia?
12
posted on
01/21/2011 11:54:19 AM PST
by
donna
(Imagine...women who honor men enough not to tempt them.)
To: donna
13
posted on
01/21/2011 11:57:04 AM PST
by
ncfool
(The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
To: wagglebee
A teacher at Oaklands Markham Elementary School has been suspended indefinitely...Around these parts "suspended indefinitely" would mean until the scavengers had removed enough that the bones were in a pile.
14
posted on
01/21/2011 11:57:56 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: wagglebee
since no pregnancy resulted, PP is pleased
15
posted on
01/21/2011 11:59:12 AM PST
by
bigbob
To: ETL
funny how even Beck and the rest of the corrupt cowardly media did not tell their viewers and listeners about Jennings and the queer agenda they have got going .
Or actually NAMBLA
all of them are cowards as is those on the right like Beck and Hannity when it comes to the social agenda of the perverted left
16
posted on
01/21/2011 12:11:48 PM PST
by
manc
(Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
To: ETL
What's he doing with his hands in his pockets???
To: wagglebee
...and to think when I was in school teacher’s would blow their stacks if they caught you chewing gum!
18
posted on
01/21/2011 12:19:01 PM PST
by
massmike
(DADT repeal: the Boy Scouts now have tougher membership requirements than the Army!)
To: wagglebee
Since the children in this story were NOT part of the PP sex ed program, the big question is:
WHERE DID THEY LEARN THIS BEHAVIOR??
While kids at this age are curious, they don’t normally know of or have that much interest in sex and don’t have knowledge of actual sex acts.
And what in the he!! was the teacher doing?? Why weren’t these kids stopped when they started removing their clothes?? Kids taking off their clothes in the classroom environment by that age is very ABNORMAL!! Kids by that point have normally developed a sense of modesty and don’t want others to see them naked.
There is a lot more to this story.
19
posted on
01/21/2011 12:21:11 PM PST
by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
To: bigbob
Actually, PP is displeased that no pregnancy occured, as the little girl cant be blessed with having an abortion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson