Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Driving US Families into Fuel Poverty
Right Side News ^ | January 3, 2011 | Niger Innis, Rev. Samuel Rodriguez and Amy Frederick

Posted on 01/03/2011 8:07:38 AM PST by IbJensen

Will America learn in time from the price being paid by British companies and families?

The Obama Administration still hasn't gotten the message voters sent Washington on November 2.

The lame duck session and 111th Congress finally ended, without the White House getting key items on its wish list. So now, the Environmental Protection Agency and Interior Department intend to impose costly, job-killing, economy-strangling new rules for power plants and refineries, and implement more land-grabs that will lock up additional millions of acres and more billions of dollars of American energy.

Their goal is to end the hydrocarbon and nuclear era in America, and force us to convert to “renewable” energy. Beginning January 2, they plan to ignore clear voter mandates and consumer needs – and use regulations and executive edicts to slash carbon dioxide emissions, impose “clean energy standards,” halt onshore and offshore drilling, and hobble the vehicles, electrical generating plants and factories that are the backbone of our nation’s economy, jobs and living standards.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson claims these actions are needed to ensure “environmental justice” for poor and minority families threatened by “manmade global warming.” Meanwhile, the United States and entire Northern Hemisphere are enduring yet another nasty winter, marked by early snow storms and record cold temperatures. Some scientists say Earth could be entering another prolonged period of cooler temperatures.

Businesses, workers and families face unemployment, injustice, bankruptcy and worse at the hands of their government, if this regulatory power grab continues.

The Congressional Research Service says average US households will pay almost $1,000 this winter just for heat. That’s average: Alaska to Florida, Hawaii to New York. Northern states residents will pay double or triple that. Businesses, schools and hospitals will also be hammered.

In Cobb County, Georgia, hundreds shivered outside to apply for heating assistance from a welfare agency that may not have enough money for every family that needs help. Along the Canadian border, in St. Lawrence County, New York, over 8,000 households were approved for heating aid by cash-strapped local, county and state governments that wonder where the money will come from – while Albany has blocked drilling for shale gas that could fuel homes and power plants, and generate billions in revenue.

All this is before the Feds actually implement more of the job-killing, family-freezing CO2 limits and other plans they are contemplating. To see what’s in store for millions of American businesses and families, one need only look at the planet’s sole country that still obstinately clings to its draconian climate change and renewable energy goals, regardless of the costs.

Across Great Britain, household energy bills could double by 2020, to $3,900 (£2,500) a year, market expert Mark Todd of EnergyHelpLine.com has warned. Gasoline prices are likewise climbing to unaffordable levels, and the majority of United Kingdom companies will see their natural gas and electricity prices skyrocket by 100% between 2012 and 2016 – on top of a carbon tax bill of “at least” $65,660 (£42,000) annually – according to the analytical firm Carbon Masters.

Moreover, most of Britain’s older coal-fired and nuclear power plants are scheduled to be shut down, with almost nothing to replace them, even as electricity demand rises. That could bring widespread blackouts, said the Daily Mail, and cause hundreds of thousands of UK jobs to be outsourced to countries where energy costs are much lower, and air pollution and carbon dioxide emission standards far less stringent. That will hardly improve England’s economy or global environmental quality.

Far worse, more than 5.5 million households will be plunged into “fuel poverty” by early 2011 – forced to spend more than 10% of their family incomes on energy – National Energy Action and other charities said. That’s over one-fifth of all UK households and a major increase from 4.5 million families in 2008. Most in these households are over age 60, but working families are also struggling to keep the heat on, as prices soar.

Nearly 28,000 people died in Britain last winter, most of them pensioners who could not afford adequate heat. Charities say this is the highest winter death rate in northern Europe, worse even than much colder nations like Finland and Sweden. And this winter has already seen the coldest December night for Wales in 169 years of record keeping. Britain is on track to having its coldest December in a century.

To stay warm, thousands of elderly are using travel passes to ride buses all day, while others seek refuge in libraries and shopping centers, the Sunday Express noted. Others are “putting their health at risk, in an attempt to keep costs down,” by bundling up and turning the heat down or off entirely, said Age UK Charity Director Michelle Mitchell.

Now, amid the Christmas and New Year holiday, two million homes, schools and hospitals face fuel rationing. Some families could wait weeks before they can get their fuel oil tanks refilled, as more snow falls across Great Britain.

Meanwhile, the British government has cut funding for its Warm Front heating assistance program from $470 million this year to $172 million in 2011, Consumer Focus campaigner Jonathan Stearn angrily noted. And because the winds barely blow during the coldest weather, Britain’s “shiny new green” turbines were able to supply only “one-500th of the exceptionally large demand” for electricity during the frigid weather of early December, Sunday Times columnist Dominic Lawson ruefully observed.

That’s a tiny fraction of the wind turbines’ “rated capacity.” But it is a situation commonly faced with turbines on freezing Minnesota winter nights and sweltering Texas summer afternoons, when they average a measly 10% of the electricity output their subsidy-hungry backers say they are capable of.

Is this what Lisa Jackson would call “environmental justice”? How do her actions, perverse notions of “justice,” and government-driven energy price spikes square with a 2009 poll by Wilson Research Strategies? It found that 56% of blacks think politicians and bureaucrats setting climate change policy in Washington fail to consider economic and quality of life concerns in the black community. Fully 76% are unwilling to pay more than $50 a year more for electricity, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Northern US winters are far worse than even record-setters in Britain. Why would anyone want to impose costly and nightmarish energy and environmental policies on American families, rich or poor?

The outgoing Congress nearly enacted a bill that would have provided much needed congressional checks on EPA actions. The Murkowski bill fell just short in a Senate dominated by partisan Democrats. The incoming Senate should be far more supportive of such legislation, especially in the face of EPA and other attempts to override the will of Congress and the American people.

The Affordable Power Alliance will urge the new Congress to honor its constitutional duties, and prevent the Obama administration from imposing excessive regulations inspired by extreme ideologies. Congress, including Democrats up for reelection in 2012, needs to heed the overwhelming public demand that America’s economy no longer be held hostage by an elitist environmental network – even if that network includes the President of the United States.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: badgovernment; corn; ethanol; evilregime
These two houses of congress sit on their arses scheming of new ways to make our lives miserable. If it isn't Chinese mercury lightbulbs to replace Thomas Edison's invention, it' s ways to dictate refining methods to make diesel and gasoline more expensive or edicting smoke detectors that require regular changing of expensive batteries.

The hate us and look with scorn on the huddled masses!

Dump them into the Potomac!

1 posted on 01/03/2011 8:07:42 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Obama needs to be impeached, tried for treason and brought to justice for the harm he has done to our country. I pray every day that God would strike him and his evil minions down and replace them with Godly men and women.


2 posted on 01/03/2011 8:10:38 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

$5 / gal. begets President Palin


3 posted on 01/03/2011 8:13:31 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
$5 / gal. begets President Palin

It also begets depression-era unemployment rates that even the MSM won't be able to hide

4 posted on 01/03/2011 8:18:39 AM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

***Their goal is to end the hydrocarbon and nuclear era in America, and force us to convert to “renewable” energy.***

Scene from BECKET;
King Henry is caught out in a rainstorm and goes to a hovel demanding fire and warmth.

Becket: You will find no fire here sire.
Henry: And why is that!

Becket: Each hovel is allowed only two measures of wood a year. One stick more and they are hanged.
Henry: My edict?

Becket: Your edict sire.


5 posted on 01/03/2011 8:18:51 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (I visited GEN TOMMY FRANKS Military Museum in HOBART, OKLAHOMA! Well worth it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

> $5 / gal. begets President Palin

Not sure.

More Americans will be forced to stay home, but just think, they’ll be able to watch more of Ooompah, and the View, and “reality tv” (a contradiction in terms if ever there was one) and the socialist drek from PBS/CPB/NBC/CBS/ABC/MSNBC

Isn’t that grand?


6 posted on 01/03/2011 8:19:07 AM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
No energy-independence nonsense for Zer∅.

∅bama wants all US wealth siphoned to third-world dictators where it belongs.

7 posted on 01/03/2011 8:20:39 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson claims these actions are needed to ensure “environmental justice” for poor and minority families threatened by “manmade global warming.”

Bullshit.

It will hit those who can least afford it the hardest - i.e. the POOR.

This whole bunch needs to be thrown out of power and sent to prison for the damage that they are inflicting upon this country. Damn them all to hell.


8 posted on 01/03/2011 8:25:24 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Tralala boom-dee-aye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Dump them into the Potomac!

You are far too kind. I wouldn't give them any chance. The pubbies have another golden opportunity, set a goal of 1 dollar per gallon gasoline. This is immediate help for America's "Working Families". Further, they could run against an unelected bureaucracy destroying the lives of Americans for marxism and a complete lie...Global Warming.

9 posted on 01/03/2011 8:27:01 AM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar; IbJensen

Indeed, the left’s goal is a return to feudalism,
where they, the “elite” (neo-nobility), control every resource,

and the peasants live and die at their whims.


10 posted on 01/03/2011 8:27:25 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Food prices will skyrocket. Gasoline with the increase ethanol will destroy many older cars, lawn mowers, boats, etc, etc, and will cost the loss of millions of jobs. People will not be able to afford driving to work much less support other activities. We could list hundreds of problems but the biggest is the civil war that may happen during this year.
11 posted on 01/03/2011 8:52:54 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

“set a goal of 1 dollar per gallon gasoline”

Anyone running with this during a presidential race will WIN!


12 posted on 01/03/2011 9:21:12 AM PST by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
The oil price shock has been seriously underestimated as the cause of the current economic crisis. A smart administration would be working to lower energy costs both fuel and electric. That would put more funds in the hands of consumers and businesses alike. Instead we are going the opposite direction. We should be:
13 posted on 01/03/2011 9:25:53 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

” Dump them into the Potomac! “

You’d never get an EPA permit to dump that much toxic waste....


14 posted on 01/03/2011 9:33:19 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annelizly
Of course. Most people don't know that we can convert coal into oil for about sixty dollars per barrel. Two dollar per gallon would be easy and lower prices quite possible. The pubbies have to be tough enough to tell the truth about “Renewables”.
15 posted on 01/03/2011 9:47:18 AM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Justice can not come soon enough nor be severe enough.


16 posted on 01/03/2011 9:57:50 AM PST by Gator113 (I'm voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I believe a civil war is now officially the BEST case scenario.... :-(


17 posted on 01/03/2011 10:12:52 AM PST by kaylar (It's MARTIAL law. Not marshal(l) or marital! This has been a spelling PSA. PS Secede not succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; enough_idiocy; meyer; Normandy; Whenifhow; TenthAmendmentChampion; Clive; scripter; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

18 posted on 01/03/2011 12:58:09 PM PST by steelyourfaith (ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson