Posted on 12/30/2010 12:48:38 PM PST by New Jersey Realist
Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring's intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings
The most famous example of inbreeding is in ancient Egypt, where several Pharaonic dynasties collapsed after a couple of hundred years. In order to keep wealth and power within the family, the Pharaohs often married their own sister or half-sister and after a handful of generations the offspring were mentally and physically unfit to rule.
Another historical example is the royal houses of Europe where royal families often married among each other because tradition did not allow them to marry people of non-royal class.
The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status.
The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world's oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years.
A rough estimate shows that
(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...
Saddam Hussien’s first wife was his first cousin. The product of that union was their son Uday. I’ll leave it at that...
Cousin marriage is also legal in over half the states...because--even though unpleasant to consider--there is no scientific evidence marriage to even first-cousins produces undue numbers of birth defects--as their genetic consanguinity is far enough away.
Marrying half (or full!) siblings yes, like the Pharaohs, will guarantee birth defects....which is why the Bible forbids it. The Bible however, does NOT forbid marrying cousins, therefore morally, it is NOT incest.
There are a lot of reasons why Muslim peoples are backward, but cousin marriage isn't one of them. Do they marry half brothers or sisters? If so, then yes, that is a problem. This report is rubbish.
The Love That Dare Not Speak Its Surname
What's wrong with marrying your cousin?
By William SaletanPosted Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 5:32 PM ETIllustration by Robert NeubeckerA new group is struggling for acceptance. The group is people who are married to their cousins. These people note that 20 percent of marriages around the world are between first cousins, that Albert Einstein and Charles Darwin married their first cousins, and that first-cousin marriage, while prohibited in half the United States, is legal in Canada and throughout Europe. Now a study by the National Society of Genetic Counselors says that having a child with your first cousin raises the risk of a significant birth defect from about 3-to-4 percent to about 4-to-7 percent. According to the authors, that difference isn't big enough to justify genetic testing of cousin couples, much less bans on cousin marriage. From this, the media have concluded that marrying your first cousin is "OK." Is it?
From another article about the science of genetic problems with cousin marriage here.
The Hapsburg dynasty was pretty inbred.
Chlorine might help!
Was that in Pumpkin County?
Ping to the article you sent me.
ping
Thank You!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.