If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

[Big Guy and Rusty 99]

yeah man, f_cking homos. I am not a “homo-lover” however you might have some latency issues yourself, based on your level of hatred.

[trisham]

Maybe I need a list of what is included in the "Homosexual Agenda"

Ping!

[roses of sharon]

What they do bedroom is their business

Oh how we wish this was true...but it is they who formed political orgs (GLBT-lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender, for one) to petition the Federal Government for special rights.

It is they who dress up anal sex into flowery civil rights language. It is they who petition local, state, governments to enter school grounds and "teach" that anal sex is normal and natural.

It is they who demand the normalization of a medically and morally dangerous sex practice. (just take a walk thru a hospital ward where men in their 30s and 40s are unable to contain their own feces anymore, FGS)

No way would any parent encourage their 18 year old son to join the Military and shower, sleep, and live with men who openly and proudly enjoy anal sex. And yes, they do ADMITTEDLY prefer young men for obvious reasons.

To endanger our young people this way is a crime. Not to mention their risk of being disciplined when they speak up or complain when approached...the congress has already discussed the "special training" our young sons will have to receive...along with the "special discipline" and hate crime laws that will soon ensue.

[OCCASparky]

Republicans that support the likes of Gregg, Collins, Snowe, Brown?

Gregg retired. While sadly, the idiots in 2CD gave us a RINO in Bass, the alternative (Kuster) was far worse. As far as the others, not even close. It's pretty apparent you haven't been following politics up here for the last couple of years. And UNH? What did they do, poll the faculty or a few random folks in Dover and Durham only? UNH also had Che-Porter up by nearly double-digits until two weeks before midterms (Guinta won by 14.)

Fergus Cullen ran the GOP into the ground here with his RINO crap--he was shown the door and today can't get the time of day from the state GOP or anyone in a position of authority. The rank and file despises him. The GOP leadership in this state is definitely of the conservative variety, not the pale pastels but bold colors that Reagan spoke of--they'll keep the RINOs in line, or else.

My opinion has eff-all to do with where I was birthed, and more to do with observations and facts.

[manc]

have you served?
A simple yes or no would suffice please.

Now in combat unites like mine we have to do survival training, we have to share sleeping bags for warmth etc you think want to be sleeping with a raving homosexual?
How about two men now after work on base dressing as women in skirts?
How about men holding hands and asses and kissing at the bar on base?
What about homosexual parties now?
What about Chaplains being forced into marrying them?
What about them now saying they can die but cannot marry in their state so overturn DOMA/

Too many problems with this crap and of you have served in combat unit then you would know that we live in very close quarters with no privacy.

Due to close quarters and stress there are many fights what if now the homosexual now has a fight and then says he was beaten because he’s a raving homo?
Will we now lose another good Marine?
Course we will because the queer special interest groups will come in and do lawsuits.
You can bet the media yet again will not report any of the problems like they never report about women serving with men?

[Las Vegas Ron]

I know my vocabulary might cause you migraines but

Its not your vocabualry it's your moronic libtard logic.

[Big Guy and Rusty 99]

Your argument is ridiculous on its face. You should have just put “Yeah, but the QUEERS!” instead. It would have been a better argument then what you put.

[manc]

right out of the left’s handbook, anyone disagreeing with the queers and their agenda and they say you might have some queer views.
If you are a conservative then you need to stop going down to their level.

[ohioman]

You are the one with the problem. The ones I hate are folks like you mucking up this otherwise great website. FU!!!

[central_va]

Here is the dirty, disgusting, filthy cross roads we find ourselves; if buggery in the barracks is now acceptable, what in our society is now unacceptable? For example, the war on drugs is a joke, a lot of things now make no sense.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

In regards to Jesus and his stance with the Roman Soldiers, he said; “He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.” That is hardly an acceptance for their profession.

Roman Soldiers were also given ultimate control and authority over the lower population. They could execute someone for jaywalking without a trial or hearing. It was also a fact that they were the highest paid and they received many rights and privileges that the general population did not. They were considered to be rich and powerful under the Roman Society rules. They were pretty much Mercenaries.

What you wrote is complete BS. Do you truly believe that Jesus condoned their salvation, based on the fact that even though they lived violent, brutal lives, that they would be allowed forgiveness while they continued to slaughter the innocent or oppressed under Roman Law?

[Big Guy and Rusty 99]

It is not what each does that is the same, it is what they say.

[Big Guy and Rusty 99]

you forgot to put “no homo” at the end of your sentence. Otherwise it sounds kind of gay.

[manc]

you say it is ridiculous and yet never point out why and you know why that is,?
Because you are unable to answer a question and you know it brings good points including if you have never served then don’t tell those serving and vets what is best for them.
Remember the shoe analogy?
Well it fits you if you have never served.

I suggest that you listen to military members serving and vets as our views are far more knowledgeable on this than someone who has never served.

[cranked]

Anyone have a running count of how many have been zotted thus far? Good riddance.

[manc]

knock it off hey.Everything you are saying is right form the lefts playbook.
You have said basically the same to me as well as Hubblegunner.

Have you served and what unit if so?

[vox_freedom]

thanks, lj. he went under MY radar!

[Sidebar Moderator]

Knock it off. If you don’t like it here, get the hell out.

[Clint N. Suhks]

you might have some latency issues yourself

Wow, that's right out of the Homosexual Agenda Handbook too. Accuse the dissenter of the behavior.

That's three, you compare the practice of perversion to race, compare those, actually JimRob, against the repeal of DADT to Fred Phelps and that they are closeted homosexuals.

Where do you get your talking points from, GLAAD?

[manc]

he knows he might be banned so he’s getting his posts in quick.

Every post is right from the homosexuals playbook