Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Worth repeating.
Once you open the door with open arms for the homosexuals, every other “lifestyle” will seek to also gather in your arms: pedos, transsexuals, zoophiles and the like. I was content to live and let live with the gays at one point (I wont bother them if they dont bother me), but they have proven time and again they will not be satisfied with my silence, but repeatedly insist on my endorsement (and in some instances, deification) of their acts.
Unless we want to see pedo pride parades, I suggest more conservative forums take this stance.
Some of us are more innocent than others. :p
Pat who?
Thank you for posting that, roses of sharon.
Louis Gohmert, a truly Conservative Texan, representing the First District (he's a former member of the A&M Corps of Cadets and ex-Army) correctly forecasts the harm this will cause our fighting force in this video clip.
As I listen to his words of moral clarity and unassailable logic, I am so proud of Texas and this good man.
Up until the past several years I would not have discouraged an 18 year old from joining up. But too much has changed over 20 years or so. Until our elected leaders in Washington DC stop the illicit social engineering, consistent under manning with consistent over deploying, and such things as the insane 8 year first enlistment obligation, I can't encourage anyone to join but rather advise against it at the current time. This repeal is the last straw.
Until we once again get a POTUS of the Reagan caliber who will actually stand up to congress for our troops it's not going to get better. Our troops deserve far better support and treatment than what this nation has been giving them for two decades straight. Supporting our troops also means giving them what they need including equipment and manpower.
GOD help and protect those now serving. May they not be the ones who's lives are sacrificed for our elected leaders gross tyranny against GOD and our country. Sad to say leaders are one of two things. They usually are either a blessing or curse in direct reflection of national attitude towards GOD.
Only Two Choices are left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which way will this nation remain? Right now we are headed into judgment. Ones not thinking this is not the "State of The Union" are only kidding themselves and are in denial.
It is their in your face agenda which provokes many,.
Years ago they got on with their lives and did what they did in the bedroom now they want it taught in schools to little kids, hang around bathrooms, dog parks etc.
I think the people who know a few of them have lost sight of what is going on.
Their agenda is asking that they be accepted like heterosexuals, things like marriage, military.
Why
Because it is all based on sex and no it is not love.
I love many things but feel no attraction to have sex with my daughter, dog, sons,MIL EEK..
It’;s not about privacy now as they do their parades, want people to know what turns them on etc.
Don’t ask gave them privacy so why get rid of it?
Every argument they use can be used for incest, animals etc.
Yea the usual of well we don’t want Govt telling us what to do.
it’s all about sex and the homosexuals I have met have all seemed very immature and certainly not all there but of course I don’t expect those who have no problem with them to see that as they are being blinded by their friendship etc.
To base all of their acceptance on sex is just plain nuts and no way can we go from having them with a mental illness to now having a handful of shrinks back in the hippies days now saying they’re normal.
Can we give those same rights and acceptance to sex with animals, incest with willing partners, 9 wives etc?
If we used their argument we should and to say that the comment I have used is stupid is ignorant.
I do have to hand it to the commies and far left for their persistence as they said back in the 60’s with their manifesto that they had to promote homosexuality in order to ruin the back bone of this country which is the traditional family and religion.
Hell we’re talking about two men inserting their penis into a hairy arse or women wearing strap on’s pretending to be a man to the other woman in order to get off.
it’s not what nature intended but fine their they go but to say they should be treated as a normal couple is like asking a man having sex with animals be treated the same.
In essence there is a line.
One side is the man and woman having babies the natural way, getting married and having kids in order to keep the humans species alive.
On the other is anything goes.
I know what side I am on and it is time we fought back, spoke publicly as they want us to shut up to pass their agenda.
Thank you for the substantiation. There is much about the Constitution presupposed, that is not always explicitly stated.
John Adams — Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
A few more here, http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/quotes_compare.html and while i am aware not all were orthodox Christians, and some had a somewhat warranted antagonism to institutionalized Christianity, I think they overall a esteemed the Bible, and I know of no atheists among them.
NAIL ON HEAD
Every argument they use can be used to any other sexual perversion.
We afford to have them we have to afford everyone their perversions otherwise it is discrimination and we can’t have that can we?
I am not from a big city so I haven’t been exposed to actually being around gays. One time I was at a party - I was sitting by some guy - quickly realizing through the conversation that he was a gay - I felt so uncomfortable, I had to remove myself, I honestly felt like punching him in square in the teeth. ( my honest feeling.)
I couldn’t imagine having to spend time in close quarters serving in the military in that environment... In combat, I’m sure I wouldn’t care, but in everyday living, I couldn’t do it.
These idiots in Congress never stop to think that some people really / sincerely have difficulties being around gays?
********************************
Really? The *same* person?
“I have read the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. I saw nothing about homosexuals in there.”
And in this ONE sentence, you have completely made Jim’s point. The really sad thing is that you don’t even understand it yourself.
TOOMEY! Remember? Pat Toomey? The one that you banned BADRAY for when he tried to warn you about him? Does this mean BADRAY gets a reprieve?
There is only way to go foward. It is to fight back. I admit my faults but I am not a person who likes to see family structures being broken for peversion.
Yes, the country has more unmarried, childless than ever before. The only way to fix this is to argue for traditional family values and believing in the strength of mother and father parenting not any these lifestyles.
you have your head screwed on and your parents did a good job.
The family has been a backbone of this great country and the commies knew that by ruining it they would weaken America.
Merry Christmas to you and your family.
No. He was allowed back in on probation and almost immediately went back to trolling mode. No thanks. Don’t need it a third time.
My parents are the liberals-THAT’s how I became the conservative.
Good riddance! Liberal loser.
In my opinion it happens every time someone posts "hey, I don't think [insert tired old liberal cause here] is so bad...they do it in [insert name of foreign country or contextually unrelated institution here] and it's working out OK" and suddenly a half dozen folks who ought to know better cautiously agree with the premise because they want to be seen as broadminded or tolerant or whatever. I realize that the majority of such posters are trolls,, but it seems like I see this sort of discussion almost every day on FR. It's getting old.
As for the rest of your post, I don't disagree. But I think we have a different philosophy. I come to FR to escape the mad brainwashed horde, and finding their spew regurgitated here disgusts me. If FR was to turn into some sort of political debating society where all viewpoints were given equal credence, I'd be gone in a flash.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.