Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Celebrating diversity and LGBT rights is for the civilian world, NOT the military.
So the faggot agenda is fine everywhere except in the military? IOW sexual perversion SHOULD be "celebrated" everywhere except in the military?
Well, I was referring to those people who want to "Celebrate Diversity". Obviously not everyone does.
Glad you're being honest at least.
I am honest - I am the same person in person that I am online. My views expressed here are the same as in the workplace, martial arts dojo, shooting range, amateur radio club, or the employee resource group I am a member of at work.
This does not always make me a popular person no matter what group of people I am with. But such is life...
I have found that trying to understand where the other person is coming from and having a sense of humor helps...
According to the Texas Castle Doctrine, I get to judge a few things myself under certain circumstances.
To: OCCASparky
No, it is not in the Bible. That’s one of the cotton-candy sayings brought out by modern sects to promote the idea that God doesn’t condemn people, only acts. The Bible states that “As a man thinketh, so is he.” It also has this to say:
Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men. For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain. Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.
(Psalm 139:19-22)
If you are gonna paraphrase, I suggest you do it this way.. "Judge not, that you be not judged... ye hypocrites" because Jesus was talking to hypocrites. "Judge not, that you be not judged" (Mat. 7:1)? Jesus gave that teaching to hypocrites (Mat. 7:5)
Jesus warned against judging falsely or with hypocrisy. For immediately after saying "judge not," Jesus taught just how to judge correctly:
* "And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?... Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother's eye." Mat. 7:3, 5
Christ kept this theme throughout His ministry. "Hypocrites," Jesus said, "why, even of yourselves, do you not judge what is right?" (Luke 12:56-57)
Replace your "Judge Not" with the correct "Judge Rightly"
* "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment." John 7:24
* Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judge by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Do you not know that we shall judge angels? How much more, things that pertain to this life? I say this to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you, not even one, who will be able to judge between his brethren? 1 Cor. 6:2-5
Judging homosexual matters is not rocket science... it is plain and simply wrong and needs to be called out.
if every conservative and every talk show hosts , TV host had told their viewers and listeners and had called on mass those RINO’s we might have been able to stop this disgusting bill.
JR had a great idea about a PAC and it is high time we started to put pressure on these people so they cannot ignore us anymore.
Also it’s up to JR obviously but maybe we could get something like an alert list where if we hear of a bill and a few reps are going to vote for it then we get mail alerting us who to call and what their numbers are.
That way instead of a local rep just getting 5 calls a day in support of our cause these reps around the country would get hundreds in a day.
I had called every RINO a bunch of times and got some family members but it seems so did the homosexual activists and sites.
We have to make the GOP, talk show hosts(Hannity etc) TV hosts to inform their viewers etc what the homsoexual agenda ios dong and who they are targeting.
Showing a video of the Folsom fair would be devastating for their agenda and it might actually wake up those who say no problem with it because they know a homosexual or two.
They are all in this together.
'Evil', while it looks imposing, is actual fragile and is easily defeated by those that know the truth for 'evil' is built on a foundation of lies. The opposite holds true for 'good'. You are good man.
Agreed. We didn’t get to this sad state over night. We got here because one person decided it wasn’t worth the hassle, then another, then another. One person explained away and rationalized giving up, then another, then another.
Decide the type of world you want to live in and then make it happen. We are free when we choose to be. Accepting defeat is not an option. Debating the illogical and perverse is the same as giving up.
With the help of Almighty GOD we will eventually prevail in removing the homosexual scum from this country and soon the world.
Only GOD can help us finally remove the pillowbiting, queer, fag, scum from God’s World. The Obamunists are anti-GOD. Remember where you are and who’s side you are on.
You have a lot of old school wisdom for someone ‘young’.
(the founders did NOT preach that anal sex was normal and natural)
http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=101
Has Homosexuality Always Been Incompatible With Military Service?
While the issue of homosexuals in the military has only recently become a point of great public controversy, it is not a new issue; it derives its roots from the time of the military’s inception. George Washington, the nation’s first Commander-in-Chief, held a strong opinion on this subject and gave a clear statement of his views on it in his general orders for March 14, 1778:
At a General Court Martial whereof Colo. Tupper was President (10th March 1778), Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment [was] tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier; Secondly, For Perjury in swearing to false accounts, [he was] found guilty of the charges exhibited against him, being breaches of 5th. Article 18th. Section of the Articles of War and [we] do sentence him to be dismiss’d [from] the service with infamy. His Excellency the Commander in Chief approves the sentence and with abhorrence and detestation of such infamous crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of camp tomorrow morning by all the drummers and fifers in the Army never to return; The drummers and fifers [are] to attend on the Grand Parade at Guard mounting for that Purpose. 1
General Washington held a clear understanding of the rules for order and discipline, and as the original Commander-in-Chief, he was the first not only to forbid, but even to punish, homosexuals in the military.
An edict issued by the Continental Congress communicates the moral tone which lay at the base of Washington’s actions:
The Commanders of . . . the thirteen United Colonies are strictly required to show in themselves a good example of honor and virtue to their officers and men and to be very vigilant in inspecting the behavior of all such as are under them, and to discountenance and suppress all dissolute, immoral, and disorderly practices, and also such as are contrary to the rules of discipline and obedience, and to correct those who are guilty of the same.
***
America’s first law book, authored by founding jurist Zephaniah Swift, communicated the popular view concerning sodomy:
This crime, tho repugnant to every sentiment of decency and delicacy, is very prevalent in corrupt and debauched countries where the low pleasures of sensuality and luxury have depraved the mind and degraded the appetite below the brutal creation. Our modest ancestors, it seems by the diction of the law, had no idea that a man would commit this crime [anal intercourse with either sex]. . . . [H]ere, by force of common law, [it is] punished with death. . . . [because of] the disgust and horror with which we treat of this abominable crime. 25
John David Michaelis, author of an 1814 four-volume legal work, outlined why homosexuality must be more strenuously addressed and much less tolerated than virtually any other moral vice in society:
If we reflect on the dreadful consequences of sodomy to a state, and on the extent to which this abominable vice may be secretly carried on and spread, we cannot, on the principles of sound policy, consider the punishment as too severe. For if it once begins to prevail, not only will boys be easily corrupted by adults, but also by other boys; nor will it ever cease; more especially as it must thus soon lose all its shamefulness and infamy and become fashionable and the national taste; and then . . . national weakness, for which all remedies are ineffectual, most inevitably follow; not perhaps in the very first generation, but certainly in the course of the third or fourth. . . . To these evils may be added yet another, viz. that the constitutions of those men who submit to this degradation are, if not always, yet very often, totally destroyed, though in a different way from what is the result of whoredom.
Whoever, therefore, wishes to ruin a nation, has only to get this vice introduced; for it is extremely difficult to extirpate it where it has once taken root because it can be propagated with much more secrecy . . . and when we perceive that it has once got a footing in any country, however powerful and flourishing, we may venture as politicians to predict that the foundation of its future decline is laid and that after some hundred years it will no longer be the same . . . powerful country it is at present. 26
In view of the arguments listed by historical and legal sources, there is substantial merit for maintaining the ban on homosexuals in the military. 27 The Founders instituted this ban with a clear understanding of the damaging effects of this behavior on the military. This ban has remained official policy for over 200 years and one would be hard-pressed to perceive the need for altering a policy which has contributed to making America the world’s foremost military power.
I don't get it.
Sons of Liberty II...do you have any connection to that great radio show on 1270 The Patriot Sat afternoons?
Im not up on all this stuff....
I know McCaine fought against this
how much support did other Republicans give this change in policy?
Had the next Congress dealt with this would it have passed ?
Does this include Pat Toomey?
Great historical post... I appreciate the read.
Yup. The country was founded as a Judeo-Christian nation. The further we drift away from our roots, the more evil it becomes. Government has turned from defending our rights to destroying our rights. They’ll continue until the people have no choice but to exercise the remedies left for us by our Founders in the DOI.
While we are all born with a sinful proclivities, yet God gives man the ability to resist acts of sin, (Gn. 4:7) although this can be forfeited by continual yielding to man’s sinful nature.
The reason homosexual relations attract so much controversy, is partly because their detrimental effects are not immediately manifest, and rejecting the Scriptures, finite human reasoning of man seeks to reject is necessary moral absolutes.
And it is also because, unlike things such as heroin addiction, it is promoted as normative and healthy, and is highly intolerant have any that would oppose it. . http://conservapedia.com/Homosexual_agenda
Someone who works at a TV station told me today that a pro-homosexual activist group called up seeking airtime, with their stated agenda being that of teaching preschool children the message of homosexual tolerance
the devil understands the principle behind “train up a child in the way he should go and when he is old, he shall not depart from it.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.