Posted on 12/16/2010 1:17:21 PM PST by Cardhu
Lakin Sentenced
1545: Sentence announced. Dismissal, confinement for 6 months, total forfeitures.
Careful, you’re likely to trip over your own polysyllabic sequipedalianism.
I’d wager that the erudite and sagacious Winston Churchill, were he alive today and acquainted with the Birther Narrative, would exhort the Birther Community to wake up and smell the coffee.
Donofrio filed suit roughly a week before the election. And Keyes didn't try to sue until AFTER the election.
I did actually find the pleadings of one other person who attempted to file an eligibility suit contemporaneously with Berg, in August 2008. And it's utterly insane. (Though admittedly, not as insane as this one, which sets a pretty high bar.) I'm not surprised Birthers don't like to mention it.
It won’t happen again. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
The federal judiciary should still have jurisdiction in the cases that have come up. SCOTUS could have heard any of them on the merits.
Where’s that quote from one of the Founding Fathers saying that a court or judge refusing to hear a critical case is just as bad as ruling wrongly? I can’t believe that a conservative justice would either joke or boast about “evading” such a critical issue which has so much of the nation in turmoil. I can’t help but have a gut-level feeling that SCOTUS is compromised by some kind of threat.
What do you think is holding up progress on a Boyd Richie investigation?
I have no doubts what side Winston Churchill would be on, and it wouldn’t be the side of the guy who returned Churchill’s bust and writings to Britain because he has more loyalty to his Kenyan roots than to the roots of the free world which Churchill stood bravely - and nearly alone - to defend.
Churchill understood about loyalty and about leadership, and I think he would see right through a “leader” who despised the history of freedom and the rule of law. I think Churchill looked enough of that species in the eyeballs that he could recognize one when he saw him. As can much of America, in ever-increasing numbers.
The parallels are sobering.
Nice to see that Stars and Stripes is nothing more than an obama machine.
I continue to be amazed at the lies and horsesh!t spewing out of media organizations these days.
Not according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as I understand them. That's my beef with birthers. They'd have the law twisted or broken if it meant getting an improper eligibility case before the judiciary. Obama has no respect for the law. That's why justice must be served according to the letter of the law.
Regarding the investigation of Boyd Richie, I suspect the AG believes it would be a waste of time and money.
For the sake of my blood pressure I’ve been avoiding the inaccurate media as much as possible. In the past I’ve tried to correct the disinformation but usually I can’t even get the factual information past the censors at the websites. And the “news sources” ALWAYS either ignore the factual information or else refuse to print it.
The only way I know to get the genuine facts to people is by the slow process of “each one reach one”. We’re making progress, but it’s painstakingly slow.
What really needs to happen is a criminal investigation of the folks in Hawaii who know their statements are being misused - who deliberately made their statements so they WOULD be misused - and failed to correct those who misused their words, which is a violation of the Federal General False Statement Act. As soon as they knew that ANYBODY was claiming they had said they have a LEGALLY VALID BC for Obama they had a legal obligation, according to the Federal General False Statement Act, to make another statement correcting that error to say that what they have - the “vital records verifying that Obama was born in Hawaii” - is actually an amended BC which is not legally valid. And they should also have disclosed - as required by law upon request - the actual records in question.
when I attended law school over 25 years ago, the first thing I learned in the appeals process is that it does not seek to overturn RESULTS or dismiss evidence unless it can be proven to be "tainted" that was improperly handled and inappropriately granted submission. For any appeal to succeed, it would have to be shown that there was something substantively wrong in the court's procedures, such that it might have changed the outcome one way or another. That means technical incompetence and I seriously doubt it was present in this case. Too many sets of eyes watching from all directions of the political spectrum. This Lieutenant Colonel was brave and incredibly stupid to threaten the livlihood of his family on an unwinnable battle. All I can hope for is that some brave capitalist has agreed to employ him for the rest of his life so that he can feed himself and his family. 'Cuz he's not coming back from something like THIS on his record and expect to make the big bucks in the private sector. He can kiss all of his tri-care benefits buh-bye too and that means the medical benefits for his family are gone along with his commission. As far as the military is concerned, he never existed.
I don’t doubt Churchill would recognize Obama for what he is. I do, however, doubt that he would engage in conspiracy theories.
I don’t doubt Churchill would recognize Obama for what he is. I do, however, doubt that he would engage in conspiracy theories.
Is it a ‘conspiracy theory’ to notice that he is “untouchable” and basically has the Chinese [idea of] “Mandate of Heaven” despite that America isn’t China?
I doubt that Churchill would be queasy at calling a conspiracy what it is. And what else would you call the illegal behavior of multiple government agencies, combined with the documented threats to media if they reported on this issue?
I haven’t yet posted all the documentation about it it yet, but there is solid evidence that microfilms were changed out at least once in every library that’s listed in a list of holdings for the Star-Bulletin and Honolulu Advertiser for the dates that Obama’ birth announcements were supposedly printed. Except one, and that’s only because we don’t know what it has because we didn’t check that library.
So not only is it a conspiracy, it is a quite extended and elaborate one, involving multiple government agencies and the alteration of historic documents in libraries in 2 states and the Library of Congress. (If nothing else it deserves RICO charges.)
And it is a documented conspiracy.
So I see no reason for Churchill or anybody else of sound mind to put their fingers in their ears and act as if it’s crazy to acknowledge that you’re at war when the actions of your enemies are already documented. It’s just as stupid to deny a documented conspiracy as it is to claim one that’s been disproven. And in this case, the multiple illegal activities to deceive the public have already been documented.
Neville Chamberlain insisted that Hitler wasn’t trying to take over the world; he was just feeling a little constrained by the borders of his country, wanted to do a little annexing. Hitler wasn’t conspiratorial, Chamberlain believed, and the way to deal with it was to just get along, not make any outlandish conspiracy claims, and just appease Hitler into tranquillity.
Churchill, OTOH, saw right through Hitler - and through the German propaganda ministry which strictly adhered to the policy that the people would believe a big lie before they would believe a little one.
“Big lie” is another definition for “conspiracy”. IOW, Hitler and his machine were engaged in a conspiracy and said the bigger it was, the more likely it was to succeed. Churchill recognized the character and plot of the conspirators, and simply believed what his eyes told him.
And I have no doubts he would see right through Obama AND the motivations behind the laws broken by multiple government agencies and the falsification of multiple historic records in multiple states - all on Obama’s behalf.
I hope he makes millions from the book I hope he writes. I would buy it.
Obama needs to be impeached, tried for treason and brought to justice by a jury of military families who lost loved ones due to Obama’s insane rules of engagement.
Does the S&S still post the number of military personnel killed in the war everyday?
“Are you also questioning the legitimacy of every order given in every branch of service since January 2009? “
Everything surrounding an illegitimate President smells — thanks to corrupt politicians that allowed this travesty to happen.
Obama was not properly vetted, Period!!!
And who might these be or are you just humming to the amen corner?
Resignation might not be an option for an officer, either, who might have an ADSO (Active Duty Service Obligation).
Churchill was certainly well aware of conspiracies throughout history: not only did he write about them in his histories, his own family was involved in (and also fought against) many conspiracies throughout English history. Catholics versus Protestants, succession struggles, Jacobitism, and a host of other factional infighting and secretly ganging up on common rivals are all part and parcel of English history.
Indeed, the English still publicly mark Guy Fawkes Night, one of the more interesting conspiracies of all time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.