Posted on 11/27/2010 12:56:43 PM PST by factmart
This thread is only for freepers who want Sarah Palin to be President in 2012. Please all (TROLLS)other stay out.
How appropriate!
Ah, yes, a personal attack. The last refuge when one has no facts.
*ahem*
Your disruptions would have more meaning, if you were to actually state someone you support, rather than just whining.
Whaah.
nicely said...I’m with you and Sarah all the way to DC
You mean because I’m even more cynical... or more “optimistic”... lol
BTW, I’m going on record here that as of now I support Palin for President... I don’t think we have the luxury of waiting until the primaries... we have seen how the establishment uses that to their advantage and will once again saddle us with someone who is electable.
If we lose... we lose... I don’t think we will but I’m prepared for a second term of Obama with a stronger Tea Party controlled Republican majority in both houses of Congress than I am making another deal with the devil, a la Mitt Romney, Pawlenty or any other RINO the establishment throws at us.
I still like my paleo friends like EV but some of their criticisms get to the point of splitting “theological” purist hairs (since we’re still talking about this in terms of “worship”). Reagan wouldn’t have lived up to the standards we’re imposing today.
As far as “electability”, as a firm believer in the Sovereignty of God, my job is to pray, support and vote. God will decide who sits on this earthly “throne” we call the Presidency and His will can and will not be thwarted. If more of us had this kind of confidence in the providence of God (myself included), we would stop worrying about pollsters and pundits and not be afraid to be bold and courageous in our politics.
From http://www.rmcpac.com/ronald-reagan-stated-1975-raise-banner-bold-colors-not-pale-pastels
On March 1, 1975, in the wake of the disastrous post-Watergate election, Ronald Reagan stood before a disheartened Conservative Political Action Conference and proclaimed, “A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.”
Then, as now, there was a din of voices from the media and from “moderate” Republicans calling on the Party to abandon its conservative principles.
Reagan’s Message
Here is what Ronald Reagan told the assembled delegates of CPAC that day:
“I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, “We must broaden the base of our party” - when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.
Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?
Let our banner proclaim our belief in a free market as the greatest provider for the people.
Let us explore ways to ward off socialism, not by increasing government’s coercive power, but by increasing participation by the people in the ownership of our industrial machine.
It is time to reassert our principles and raise them to full view. And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way.”
Five years later, Ronald Reagan was elected President of the United States.
Has a nice Ring to it!
It's great too, I can not Image anyone but Palin being called President February, 2013!
Show how hard all the hard work Sarah has done the last two years have paid off!
Actually sadly it is; you might want to catch up on the culture... we’re no longer in the 1950’s and no one’s kids are perfect.
Palin on record as for carbon credits:
“Q: Let me clear something up: Sen. McCain has said he supports caps on carbon emissions.
Sen. Obama has said he supports clean coal technology, which I don’t believe you’ve always supported. Do you support capping carbon emissions?
PALIN: I do. I do.”
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Joe Biden Oct 2, 2008
At first blush, I'm not sure just creating a sub panel (to study?) the climate change issue would have been unusual considering how hot a topic it was at the time. However, I would like to read the actual Executive order -- do you have a link to it?
Also, do you have a link to the VP debate with Biden? I would like to hear her own words.
Thanks in advance for any additional info/links.
Not a whine, merely pointing out your “cringing negativism.”
A personal attack in response to a question about an unwed mother being normal says volumes.
Of course.
Or Allan West... I think instead, Bolton for VP as a placeholder... West as DefSec for four years and then he takes the VP slot in 2016... Bolton can move to State and finish the purge.
Palin is on record for LOST:
LOST Treaty (Official letter) Letter from Palin
http://www.globalsolutions.org/files/general/Palin_LOS_Letter.pdf
Love it!!
The VP candidate could NOT publicly contradict her running mate. Wrong? Yes. Necessary. Unfortunately, yes as well. She could not present a divided front in a presidential campaign. She is now free from those responsibilities.
This is Politics 101. Anyone who cannot acknowledge that and uses that as a purity test is not living in reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.