Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miller sues to force exact spelling rule for write-in votes
Associated Press ^ | Nov. 9, 2010 | BECKY BOHRER

Posted on 11/09/2010 8:19:32 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

JUNEAU -- GOP nominee Joe Miller is asking a federal judge to keep the state from using discretion in counting write-in ballots in Alaska's hotly contested Senate race.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday, comes the day before election officials planned to begin counting write-in ballots that could determine the outcome of the race.

(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; joemiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Reddy

And what’s worse is that it’s an establishment GOP trying to steal the election that lost in the primary against a Tea Party candidate


21 posted on 11/09/2010 8:45:43 PM PST by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Years ago in NY we had a major write in mess too...It took weeks but “intent” was thrown out finally and exact spelling, as everyone had been told in advance, was upheld.

Even then, bad handwriting had to be considered if there were enough wiggles to represent the correct letters.

The write in candidate lost.


22 posted on 11/09/2010 8:45:56 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This is a smart move.


23 posted on 11/09/2010 8:48:16 PM PST by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Looks like he had better sue to recount those “voter intent” ballots. It will no doubt remove several thousand votes from the Kow.

Mark Levin didn't pull any punches when he was discussing this with Joe Miller and the AK Lt. Governor (on their respective nights).

He listened patiently to the Lt. Gov explain how the electoral commission would study the write-in ballots to divine the voter's intent. He then read back the Alaska state election law to him on the air. He then asked him point-blank, how that method of counting ballots comported with the LAW. The Lt. Gov actually paused and couldn't come up with a straight answer. It was pretty clear that Mark had just busted him in front of millions of listening Americans.

When he was talking to Joe Miller, he told him straight up that the Murkowski camp would steal the election unless he got his legal team on top of this immediately. Joe's a sharp cookie, but Mark sort of gave him pause, as well. You could tell that he had just been schooled by the master.

Make no mistake; Mark Levin just caused a major fire storm up there.

24 posted on 11/09/2010 8:49:46 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
I don’t see how a write in vote COULD be counted for a candidate if the name is misspelled. If the spelling isn’t right, then that’s not who the voter cast a ballot for. Simple as that. What in the hell are they doing up there?

Totally agree....someone writes "Martoski".....how do they really know that the person didn't write mean Frank Martoski? They CAN'T...that's why the rule about exact spelling has to be upheld. Ridiculous.

25 posted on 11/09/2010 8:51:38 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

No, it is based on “voter intent,” which gives liberals the wiggle room they need to win. In 1954, SC counted “Storm Thunder” as “Strom Thurmond.” AK is too liberal for Miller.


26 posted on 11/09/2010 8:54:04 PM PST by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

How many ways can they rig a race?


27 posted on 11/09/2010 8:54:04 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

If she somehow manages to win through her cheating; I would address her as the “fake senator from Alaska”.


28 posted on 11/09/2010 8:55:06 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: KoRn
I don’t see how a write in vote COULD be counted for a candidate if the name is misspelled. If the spelling isn’t right, then that’s not who the voter cast a ballot for. Simple as that.

Per Alaskan electoral law, a write-in vote can't be counted for anyone, except that person whose name is written on the ballot. Period. End of story. There's nothing in their law that allows for a subjective analysis of a voter's "intent".

If it doesn't exactly spell MURKOWSKI, she can't take the vote. That's how their law is written.

30 posted on 11/09/2010 8:56:20 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: Windflier

So now it comes down to whether we get a court like the one that ok’d Lautenberg after the Toricelli implosion?


32 posted on 11/09/2010 9:00:08 PM PST by freespirited (This tagline dedicated to the memory of John Armor, a/k/a Congressman Billybob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wolf24
The BS was really flying with the Lt.Gov in that interview.

And it was the Lt. Gov throwing all the BS.

Mark caught him dead to rights, admitting on air that they were going to allow a subjective analysis of voter "intent" when counting the write-in ballots. Mark read the Alaska statute on-air and asked the Lt. Gov to tell him where it says in the law that they can do that.

It was interesting hearing the guy dance all over the place trying to answer that one. He couldn't, and Mark told him so.

I think the dude left the call with his head spinning. Mark cold busted his ass.

33 posted on 11/09/2010 9:02:07 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

How would any voters be disenfranchised when they voted Miller in the primary?

Until Cowski declared war against how the idiot franchised voters voted?


34 posted on 11/09/2010 9:03:00 PM PST by txhurl (If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Mugabeski didn’t think of that...should have changed name to Jones.


35 posted on 11/09/2010 9:03:24 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
I understand (I hope others can confirm), that if Joe Miller's name appears on the write in portion, it will NOT count, because he is listed as a candidate on the ballot.
36 posted on 11/09/2010 9:03:25 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Current count of friends/family who have abandoned Obama: 11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Windflier; holdonnow

Thank you, Mark.


37 posted on 11/09/2010 9:04:34 PM PST by txhurl (If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Pit1
Are the election officials Democrats.

Technically, or functionally?

38 posted on 11/09/2010 9:05:29 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Current count of friends/family who have abandoned Obama: 11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: coloradan; June K.
Candidate Murowski, er, Minkowski, um, Murtovski, no, Murkyoski, wait Murrkoski, yeah, that’s it ... Murrkoski filed a predictable objection.

What happens if some write-in votes speeled it "Blutarsky" ??? 'B' on the keyboard is jsut one tyop away from 'M' ... then the Senate would get this:


39 posted on 11/09/2010 9:06:31 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"So now it comes down to whether we get a court like the one that ok’d Lautenberg after the Toricelli implosion?"

Yes, because we are a nation of laws...er...never mind.

40 posted on 11/09/2010 9:06:57 PM PST by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson