Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US GOVERNMENT COMMUNISTS
ResistNet and CommieBlaster ^ | October 29, 2010 | Asst Natl Dir Mellie

Posted on 10/30/2010 8:26:51 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Communists, Socialists, Marxists, Maoists and Islamics are in the US Government. They all believe in a government that’s opposed to the US Constitution and, thus, the America our founders created. They want America to give up its sovereignty and to become a member of a one-world socialist government. For simplicity, let’s call them all “commies”.

We began researching Obama and other commies in US Government and Media about 18 months ago and were shocked. Here’s the high-level overview of what we learned, which is chronicled in great detail at CommieBlaster.com:

- America has been at war with communism for over 90 years. The Cold War with Communist Russia did not end with the collapse of the Berlin War -- it just took a different form. A new war has commenced… a bloodless war aimed at taking all of our wealth and giving it to Communists, so they can rule America. This well-planned, decades-old, Communist Takeover is now in progress and we’ve been losing this war because Communists captured our media long ago and they hid this plan from us for years.

- The public code words for Communism now are “Progressive”, “Democracy” and “Social Justice”. You probably never heard these terms much until Obama took office, but you hear them now a lot these days.

- The Democratic Party is now a Socialist Party. Through its freely admitted, long term alliance and coordinated initiatives with The Party of European Socialists, the Democratic Party is openly connected to Chinese and Russian Socialists, as well as a full range of international commies and terrorists.

- Right now in the US Congress, there’s a publicly admitted Socialist, a couple of socialist Islamics, lots of criminals (assault, bribes, etc.), lots of anti-Constitutionalists, and way too many people who are taking money from Islamic terrorist-connected organizations. But don’t let that fool you. There are over 100 US Congress Members who are commies. Most belong to and/or are associated with members of Democratic Socialists of America and the Communist Party USA. The FBI states that the Communist Party USA and the United Nations are departments of the Russian KGB.

- Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Saebarkah), the 44th President of the United States of America is a communist. Obama precisely fits former FBI head, J. Edgar Hoover’s definition of a communist. He has associations with members of the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, was raised by communists, spent his adult life with communists, was mentored by communists, supports communists, belonged to at least one communist organization, attended at least one communist rally, worked for at least two communist bosses, is advised by communists and now, while in office, regularly meets with communists on a daily basis.

- Obama is an ideological zealot and radical. His core skill is “communist rabble-rousing”. George Soros directly and indirectly funded Obama’s presidential campaign. Obama is George Soros’ puppet. Obama is told what to say by a teleprompter’s script that is written by a George Soros-funded group of commie writers. Obama has a PR organization of over 300 commies.

- Our research strongly suggests George Soros is the face of the USA Communist Takeover. Obama works for George Soros. Most of the media works for George Soros as his propaganda department. Hundreds of socialist, activist and union organizations work for Soros as a means to siphon government money from you, generate votes for commie Democrats and fund the Communist Takeover. Examples of the organizations Soros funds include the Democratic Party, SEIU, ACORN, Tides Foundation, National Public Radio, ACLU, Open Society Institute, Moveon.org and Obama’s favorite fake media outlet, the Huffington Post.

- Goldman Sachs works for George Soros. There is a strong body of evidence to suggest that George Soros, with the help of Jeffrey Sachs of Goldman Sachs, caused the 2008 US financial collapse (Soros and Sachs have done this in other countries before). “Crisis” is Phase Two in the four-phase Communist Takeover Plan. Soros and Sachs can further crash or damage our economy pretty much whenever they want.

- George Soros is a very bad dude and is a far, far greater threat to America than al Queada. George Soros is not only converting America to communism, he’s doing the same in other countries. Remember “the Domino Theory?” Soros may also be coordinating with al Queada and/or terrorists through his connections with Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and/or other radical organizations which Soros funds.

- George Soros’ “boss” is one or more of the following: Communist Russia, Communist China and/or a band of Ultra Rich Global Elites. Soros’ supporters and co-conspirators include Bill and Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates (Microsoft), Eric Schmidt (Google), Jeffrey Sachs (Goldman Sachs), NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Warren Buffet, Oprah Winfrey and a vast group of other global elites. Their combined wealth is greater than many countries.

RESISTING THE TAKEOVER: Exposure and awareness of George Soros, Obama, commie Congress members and their international criminal conspiracy is the key to Americans winning this war. Once the conspirators are exposed, they can be researched, contained, neutralized and prosecuted. So educate yourself and tell others. Vote out all Democrats.

THE TAKEOVER PLAN’S PRIMARY WEAKNESS: There is a very substantial body of evidence that indicates Obama is ineligible to serve as US President (father’s British citizenship, multiple social security numbers, foreign student, no long form birth certificate, no hospital that will claim him, no US State certified him as constitutionally eligible to be President, tremendous efforts undertaken to prevent access to Obama’s past records, etc., etc.). If Obama is found ineligible to serve, the Communist Takeover Plot will unravel fast. All laws signed by Obama will be nullified. Then, once unraveled, we can pursue the relationships of all of George Soros’ commie organizations and prosecute all of the related criminal conspirators to the maximum extent of US law.

So don’t you think that when the GOP takes over one or both Houses of Congress in January, they ought to immediately ask Obama for proof of his eligibility to serve? If not, what does that tell you about who may be running the Republican Party? Maybe the takeover is further along than we think?

http://www.commieblaster.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bho44; billclinton; billgates; cair; china; communists; conspiracy; cpusa; crisis; davidrockefeller; democracy; democrats; dominotheory; dsa; economy; ericschmidt; europe; georgesoros; goldmansachs; google; gop; government; hillaryclinton; islamists; jeffreysachs; maoists; marxists; media; michaelbloomberg; microsoft; nwo; obama; oprahwinfrey; owg; pes; progressives; republicans; russia; socialists; socialjustice; takeover; tedturner; warrenbuffet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Looking this thread over I see that people who take offense at the assertions in the original post deal with it by ridicule and casting aspersions. I don’t see any facts or rational argument presented to challenge the posted article.

Posters who agree with the article have presented tons of facts and references to bolster the article and reinforce their positions.

It is clearly the opposition, without an argument to present, who wear the tinfoil hats.


41 posted on 10/31/2010 1:21:18 AM PDT by Iron Munro (This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

“The following members of Congress are Marxists and terrorist coddlers who have rebranded themselves as “Progressives” in an attempt to hide their agenda”

Progressive is the newspeak term for Communist these days. As you point out.


42 posted on 10/31/2010 3:21:46 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

are you saying that there is NOT enough proff of the communist take over to convince you that it is real???

The articles below are documented FACT not speculation!!!

Obama & Dems Make Great Strides… In Achieving Communist Goals for America
Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, April 18, 2010, 8:35 AM

You read that right…

Communist Goals (1963)
Documention below


Congressional Record—Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals

EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

Thursday, January 10, 1963

In 1963 The Honorable A. S. Herlong, Jr of Florida recited the Communist Goals for America in the House of Representatives on Thursday, January 10, 1963.

It looks like the communists, working through the democratic party, have made some great strides under the current Obama-Pelosi Regime.
It’s frightening. Via Free Republic.

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman’s request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following “Current Communist Goals,” which she identifies as an excerpt from “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen:

[From “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen]
CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [”]united force[”] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

The democrats are not reshaping America into a European socialist-style government… They’ve gone past that. Not even Hugo Chavez has been as aggressive as this bunch.


PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA (Repost, from 2004 speech & Snopes confirmation, 2005)

Dark Side of Illegal Immigration and Snopes ^ | (from speech of 2004. On Snopes in 2005) | ex-Colorado Governor Dick Lamn

Posted on Monday, April 26, 2010 2:13:21 PM by combat_boots
PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/lamm.asp

When contemplating the issue of illegal immigration and what to do about it, here is the transcript of a speech given by ex-Colorado Governor Dick Lamn at a population conference in Washington DC in 2004 to consider:

I Have a Plan to Destroy America

I have a secret plan to destroy America. If you believe, as many do, that America is too smug, too white bread, too self-satisfied, too rich, lets destroy America. It is not that hard to do. History shows that nations are more fragile than their citizens think. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and they all fall, and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” here is my plan:

1. We must first make America a bilingual-bicultural country. History shows, in my opinion, that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. One scholar, Seymour Martin Lipset, put it this way: The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon —— all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with its Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans.

2. I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds.

3. We can make the United States a “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently:
...the apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically, and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.
I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with a salad bowl metaphor. It is important to insure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than Americans, emphasizing their similarities.

4. Having done all this, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated - I would add a second underclass, un-assimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% drop out rate from school.

5. I would then get the big foundations and big business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of Victimology. I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was all the fault of the majority - I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.

6. I would establish dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would “Celebrate diversity.” “Diversity” is a wonderfully seductive word. It stresses differences rather than commonalities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other-that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse,” peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together, and we can take advantage of this myopia. Look at the ancient Greeks. Dorf ’s world history tells us:
The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games in honor of Zeus and all Greeks venerated the shrine of Apollo at Delphi. A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet, all of these bonds together were not strong enough to overcome two factors . . . (local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions . . .)
If we can put the emphasis on the “pluribus,” instead of the “unum,” we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.

7. Then I would place all these subjects off limits - make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to “heretic” in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist”, “xenophobe” that halts argument and conversation. Having made america a bilingual-bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of “Victimology,” I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra - “that because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good.” I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact.

8. Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson’s book “Mexifornia.” This book is dangerous — it exposes my plan to destroy America. So please, please — if you feel that America deserves to be destroyed - please, please - don’t buy this book! This guy is on to my plan.
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the Spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that Spectrum.” - Noam Chomsky, American linguist and US Media and Foreign Policy critic.

It sounds like Dick Lamn hit the nail on the head.

However, the question we need to be asking ourselves and members of Congress is:

Why is the plan to destroy America being implemented?
http://www.darksideofillegalimmigration.com/page20.html

If this isn’t enough to prove to you that this is real then you then nothing ever will so just sit back and wait until they come and steal everything you have.


43 posted on 10/31/2010 7:04:47 AM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

We need Obama to implode on his own....he just might.


44 posted on 10/31/2010 7:06:54 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Thank you for your thoughtful post. I'd like to offer a few comments. 1. "Tom Tancredo recently asserted that Barak Obama is a greater threat to America than Al Qaeda. This is not a smart political position to take but it is intellectually defensible."

Personally, I don't think it is: this position gives too much weight to a person. Do you really think that, without the adoring masses that surround Obama in this party and throughout the country he would last even for a day? We would not even know his name today were it not for the symbolism that all those leftists needed, symbolism that got fulfilled by an empty suit. Witness what happened to Hillary despite the political machine behind her, one of the most powerful and entrenched ever erected. If (and when) Obama stops satisfying the need for idolatry --- a symbol (never mind reality) of "humane," "peaceful," "socially just," "post-racial" America love abroad and feared at home --- he'll be dropped in a heartbeat.

It's not Obama that poses the greatest threat but the ideology that is shared by one half of the country.

2. "I too think that the assertion about communist infiltration of our government is perhaps a bit on the tinfoil hat side but I do not know, and worse, we are in an environment in which I cannot find out."

Whether the assertion is true is really sensitive to the meaning of the words here.

Since at least 1920s, by infiltration of communists we have meant infiltration by indiividuals that formally belonged to Communist parties. There are not many such around, and they are not popular. So, except for the self-described communist van Jones, there cannot be many communists in that sense who infiltrate the government.

What people mean by communist infiltration today, I believe, is the infiltration of by neo-communists and neo-Marxists. It is their ideology that is largely Marxist, but they do not belong to any communist party and probably do not describe themselves as communists.

The extent of such infiltration is enormous: most people in the Obama's administration, and even more so in the Dem Congress, are a mixture of fascists (in the Mussolini style --- leaving property where it is but chaining and binding it by regulation, taxation, etc.) and Marxist (nationalize means of production, let the "people" own that property, only then will "social justice" will be achieved).

I would (and did on other threads) go further and say that great many Republicans and even people on this forum espouse many of the socialist ideas, which propaganda put under their skin. That is why we had 56% growth of big government under Bush and Pawlenty proclaming in 2006 that "the era of small government is over;" that is why Republicans could not produce a candidate more conservative than McCain. Conservative, non-socialist views are simply not that popular. 3. "The point is that Bill Bennett is right, ultimately culture dominates politics."

It's not that culture dominates politics: culture produces politics and politicians - where else would they come from?

People sometimes get appalled at political of corporate corruption but forget to look at the pool from which those individuals are drawn. You raise children on the idea of how the feel rather than their character and what they do; you exile G-d from schools and public squares; you allow profanity on public streets and airways; you destroy family, where a person first learns both love, which he is then able to give to others, and sense of duty --- and after all they expect politicians, corporate leaders and movie stars to behave decently? You cannot have decent leaders when the mass of humanity does not cultivate decency: there is no pool from which to draw them.

It is in this sense that culture is the source of politics, as well as law (can the legal system be more just and fair than the people themselves). Reminds me of John Adams' words: "This Constitution is designed for a deeply moral people. It is absolutely incapable of governing any other."

4. "Beck and Limbaugh go to great lengths to overcome this problem. They do not shout naked allegations which leaves him open to charges that they wear tinfoil hats."

True. But we have to be fair to the politicians here. L and B have the luxury of time: those that committed themselves to listening (and only those) are patient enough to listen to the facts and arguments that support L's and B's conclusions. Politicians speak to people in soundbites largely because that is what people are willing to tolerate. (Recall the infamous six-week memory of American people. How many people would read today a detailed analysis and new facts about the oil spill: it's yesterday news. A huge proportion of people (I don't remember exactly) cannot name the year in which 9/11 has occurred --- that's how long ago it was). So, a politician, or a person interviewed on TV, is confined to no more than a soundbite, to naming things for what they are.

That they fail is not their wrongdoing: the blame lies with the dumbed-down public that has no clue what fascism, Nazism, communism are; these are all just "bad things" in their heads. The ignorant people, naturally, think that are simply trying to insult something when you refer it as socialist. The victory goes to the leftist scum that took over our education system long ago and thus produced three generations of Americans that cannot even recognize the threat they are facing.

45 posted on 10/31/2010 12:31:42 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
We need Obama to implode on his own....he just might.

One could argue that he is already doing it. Maybe the question is whether it's a fatal implosion.

46 posted on 10/31/2010 1:35:31 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Lt. Col. Ralph Peters: Obama is the dog who caught the fire truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hannibaal

“but I am well educated enough to understand the difference between socialism and communism”

They’re labels for very similar ideologies. And there remains quite a debate about what the difference is.

It is a lot like Wiccan’s being labeled Satanists by Christians. From a Christian perspective, idolaters like Wiccans are worshiping demons whether they are aware of it or not. They take offense at it because they reject the Christian view.

Communists and Socialists have been on opposite sides of wars, but at the heart both reject the law of God: Thou shalt not steal. Implicit in God’s commands are the right of ownership. In Christianity, the class barriers are broken within the church (or should be), but are still recognized in the natural realm of say employment, finances, etc. And giving is encouraged but voluntary.

What we see today is an aligning of many disparate views where all share a common anti-Christian thread.

For example, feminism by every definition should oppose China’s one-child policy or things like the exploitation of girls by pornographers and pimps. They don’t though. They also rarely call out Islam for abuse of women.

Feminism has become an anti-Christian religion, or face of a larger anti-Christian religion that has adapted itself to many philosophical views even on the right.

Most of the isms end up high-jacked by anti-Christians even if the original goal had something in common with Christianity. For example, the goals to help the poor, to protect the weak, to feed the hungry, and to enact just laws are twisted beyond recognition by the left.

But back to my earlier comment, if you haven’t read the Pink Swastika, I think you’ll find it both interesting and eye-opening.


47 posted on 10/31/2010 3:11:40 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
What people mean by communist infiltration today, I believe, is the infiltration of by neo-communists and neo-Marxists. It is their ideology that is largely Marxist, but they do not belong to any communist party and probably do not describe themselves as communists.

The extent of such infiltration is enormous: most people in the Obama's administration, and even more so in the Dem Congress, are a mixture of fascists (in the Mussolini style --- leaving property where it is but chaining and binding it by regulation, taxation, etc.) and Marxist (nationalize means of production, let the "people" own that property, only then will "social justice" will be achieved).

I quite agree with your assessment. The problem with the original article is that the author is sloppy in his definitions. One moment he is speaking of an old-fashioned 1950s Soviet style communist infiltration of the American government such as we saw in the person of and in the next breath he is talking about the kind of infiltration by people we used to describe as "fellow travelers" or "useful idiots."

My problem with the sloppy definition is I fear it is used as a cover for inadequate proof of real, conventionally defined communism yet the author wants to arouse the emotional reaction the invocation of such an image is sure to produce. This is not to say that the infiltration by such people, however defined, is not mortally dangerous to the Republic, it is. But it is not a J. Edgar Hoover defined communism that we used to know and understand, contrary to the sweeping assertion of the author who is too free with the use of the word "Commies."

I quite agree with your assertions about the culture, in fact, I have posted countless times on the baleful influence of The Frankfurt School on culture and, through the culture, on politics. I have observed that The Frankfurt School has so insidiously indoctrinated our culture that we do not even know that it's explicit purpose is to tear down the culture, even our epistemology, to pave the way for good, old-fashioned, J. Edgar Hoover style communism.

Thanks for your thoughtful post.


48 posted on 10/31/2010 3:58:00 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Thank you, too: I very much enjoyed reading your posts and look forward to future ones.


49 posted on 10/31/2010 4:15:30 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Re: Bad news #3: Impeaching Obama invalidates no laws, the laws still have to be repealed by bills past Biden.

• (n) derangement, a state of mental disturbance and disorientation

There's Obama's insurance, alrighty.

50 posted on 10/31/2010 9:36:14 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson