Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
I'll even it up. I'll ping the super trolls!
How did you find out I was flying to Michigan tomorrow to get my cat?
Thanks. You’re a pal.
Thanks. You’re a pal.
Hold that thought "at this point". The proof is being withheld from discovery by the courts...at this point.
Ever watch Perry Mason?
I've brought up Perry Mason a time or two on these threads. Your girl Obama may need to dig him up for her defense after all this is said and done.
Uh huh, and the Constitution also requires that the POTUS be a Natural Born Citizen vs just Citizen for all other positions.....can you kindly explain what the difference is between a NBC vs Citizen?
Suppose we have a corrupt Congress....lol....what would stop them from certifying Putin or bin lyin's kid?
Oh yeah, The after-birther klaxon went off too. ;-)
I swear, you would condemn the patriot that stood in front of the tanks in Tinnemen Square.
Don’t you understand the reason for the tea party groups is that we are respectfully, through our election process trying to change government because we don’t believe in Socialism!
This is a pivotal point. People that want Socialism, this is their chance. Those of us against Socialism and for Capitalism, this is are Front. We need to vote the Socialist out of office on both sides of the aisle. Hence the Tea Party.
Back to LT. Larkin. You are wrong. Let me make it simple, it a boyscout gives an oath to do his best and the Scoutmaster says go cut that tree down, would he be guilty for refusing to cut it down?
So you believe that all of the tens of thousands of officers serving in the military who HAVEN'T followed Lakin's lead are without honor and guilty of Conduct Unbecoming?
In an effort to not look as stupid as you may be, noob, scroll down to see what’s being discussed.
I read through the Nuremburg document you cited, and frankly, if I’m a German soldier before the London Agreement is written up (1945), then I have no way to predict, other than my conscience, that I should disobey certain of my superior officer’s orders. The Nuremburg Opinion and Judgment you cite says as much, repeatedly. It is also evident from this there were no German statutes in force and applicable to those soldiers which might have prohibited any imaginable act of obedience to a superior officer, else appeal would have been made to them and the whole matter dispatched with ease.
Therefore the Nuremburg court had no choice but to build an inference of individual criminality for specific acts from a weakly cobbled together set of international traditions. The truth is, without that appeal to conscience upon which the international law was based, there would have been no sustainable assignment of criminality, and the parties who conducted the Nuremburg trial would not have been able to push past what was evidently a strong Ex Post Facto inhibition.
And if conscience can rise to the force of law, as the document you cite appears to argue, then one can never say that pure obedience to a superior officer’s orders is always the right course of action. One is obligated, under the international law to which you appealed, and under the dictates of conscience, to consider more than whether any given military order is facially legal, especially when one is an officer, and has thereby taken on an even greater responsibility for the exercise of individual judgment.
Jim Thompson may have approved what you have posted on your personal page. But you don’t have a clue.
“So a poll result determines a constitutional question? Really?”
Only when it agrees with me.
The rules to have the votes counted were not followed. Dick Cheney was required to ask for objections; he didn’t do it. The process to count the votes and certify the winner of the electoral vote was illegal.
AND even if it had been done legally, the 20th Amendment says that if a President-elect (presumably one certified as the electoral winner, since the electoral vote is the only vote the Constitution even recognizes)”fails to qualify” by Jan 20th, the VP elect is to “act as President until a President shall have qualified”.
So the issue before the entire US military right now is whether Obama is Constitutionally allowed to act as CINC, or whether Joe Biden is.
When you consider that no electoral winner has been legally certified (meeting the legal requirements), the answer should be neither. We don’t have a CINC.
You make my argument. He was ordered to go over with his men and kill/murder people.
Defend it or justify it, troll.
What did you do with my cat?
“And a Hawaii birth certificate for someone born in Kenya would show Kenya as the birth place.”
I think Okubo was quoted as saying that it *should* list the accurate birthplace.
But you need to know that though there was an index of foreign births in 1981, the HDOH claims there isn’t one any more. Where did those names go? What index are they included in right now?
Sir, what is the purpose of our Military?
And you don't have a lifespan here.....see ya!
Meet the kitties!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.